The AM Forum
April 28, 2024, 01:27:08 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: DF Help for Odd Signal on 3570 KHz  (Read 13442 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
AJ1G
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1289


« on: June 27, 2007, 02:55:29 PM »

For at least 2 weeks there has been a spurious signal on 3570 KHz that has been heard by several members of the Old Mil Radio CW net,  at least around New England.  Consisits of a continuous series of slow CW dits ......possibly someone's cat knocked a keyer paddle onto transmit for a rig left on somewhere?  At any rate its kind of annoying, we have had to move the OMRN on Sunday nights to get away from it.  Can someone do some RDFing on it?
Logged

Chris, AJ1G
Stonington, CT
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2007, 04:19:23 PM »

What kind of cat ?
Logged
KA8WTK
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 874



« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2007, 04:32:12 PM »

A dit-zy one.
Logged

Bill KA8WTK
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2122



« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2007, 05:03:33 PM »

I just took a listen and didn't hear anything on 3570, but the static crashes are horrendous right now. 

When is the military CW net?

I am reminded of the old movie I haven't seen in 35+ years I believe is called "On the Beach" where the crew of a U.S. submarine returns to the U.S. mainland after a nuclear war.  On the way back, the sub hears a random CW signal on the air.  I don't remeber if the the transmitter was at a Navy base or not, but they tracked down the transmitter and found a window shade pull loop on the neck of a Coke bottle which was lying on a straight key.  The window was cracked open and hence the random CW being sent.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
W1GFH
Guest
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2007, 06:22:59 PM »

"On The beach"; some of the best CW you'll hear in a movie. When the shore party discovers coke bottle/key, one of the actors grabs the hand key and sends a short message back to the sub. Copyable about 15 wpm, it had prosigns and everything. As I recall, he sends something like "COKE BOTTLE ON KEY. RETURNING SHIP NW. AR SK"
Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8169


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2007, 08:10:23 PM »

A dit-zy one.

Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
Mike/W8BAC
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1042



WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2007, 08:42:43 PM »

My kind of cat. FEARLESSLY defending his human from an arrogant and menacing turntable.
Logged
AJ1G
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1289


« Reply #7 on: June 27, 2007, 09:21:08 PM »

The Old Military Radio Net CW session is at 2100 eastern every Sunday night on 3570 (+/- kitten on the key!) through about 2200.  The AM net is at 0500 eastern every Saturday morning on 3885, through about 0700.
Logged

Chris, AJ1G
Stonington, CT
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8169


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 27, 2007, 09:50:09 PM »

This guy needs a church key:

Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #9 on: June 27, 2007, 10:22:37 PM »

And a lime and a straw.
Logged
WU2D
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1800


CW is just a narrower version of AM


« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2007, 08:13:53 AM »

Chris,

I check in to this net as well and it just sounds like dah dah dah dah dah dah not di di di di

I'm learning about HFDF at my new Job at DRS. They use some cool hardware to do HFDF pronounced  "HUFFDUFF".

You want HUFFDUFF my friend.

The coolest aid in HFDF is to employ iono-sounder MUF data to tell how far away the station you are DFing is. It is all done through trig. If you know what layer is reflecting you can tell how far away the station is on a single bounce on a given frequency.

Ionosounders are located worldwide and they are used for propagation study. Here is a station that gives ionosounder data http://digisonde.haystack.edu/latestFrames.htm

Mike WU2D





Logged

These are the good old days of AM
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2007, 08:59:22 AM »

For at least 2 weeks there has been a spurious signal on 3570 KHz that has been heard by several members of the Old Mil Radio CW net,  at least around New England.  Consisits of a continuous series of slow CW dits ......possibly someone's cat knocked a keyer paddle onto transmit for a rig left on somewhere?  At any rate its kind of annoying, we have had to move the OMRN on Sunday nights to get away from it.  Can someone do some RDFing on it?

Hi Chris, how is the Volvo's HF going, recovered from lighting strike?

As for your DF request, this is where several of the internet receiver sites can be helpful, I think Paul VJB published a list some time back.
You can select ones which will give you an idea of the geographic coverage of the signal in question.
Once you have a rough idea of coverage, you could ask local hams in those areas to track it down.

You could also informally request the OO team to get involved, Paul also posted the info for that, or contact me off board for specifics.

When does this occur, all the time, just during nets, evenings, etc.?
I'll listen out at my QTH if I know when to monitor.


73 Bruce W1UJR

Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2007, 10:50:28 AM »

HF DF on high angle of arrival signals is very hard to do.
Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #13 on: June 28, 2007, 11:06:39 AM »

HF DF on high angle of arrival signals is very hard to do.

Right on that one Steve.
At the freq Chris mentioned, I was thinking ground wave, if you can find internet stations close enough.
Think that would work.

Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #14 on: June 28, 2007, 11:11:45 AM »

Ground wave will work very well. But you would need to be within a few miles or so on 75 meters to receive groundwave. Using a bunch of Web receivers may allow you to narrow the signal down to a particular areas (maybe a few states or less). After that, somebody will probably need to go mobile. Try listening in the daytime, especially around noon. This time of the year, if a receiver can hear the signal at noon, it is probably fairly close.


I can take a listen with my directional antenna. But I will only be able to tell if the signal is coming from one of four quadrants on the compass.


HF DF on high angle of arrival signals is very hard to do.

Right on that one Steve.
At the freq Chris mentioned, I was thinking ground wave, if you can find internet stations close enough.
Think that would work.


Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2007, 11:37:37 AM »

Perhaps the deployment of EMP or HERF countermeasures would do the trick?  Roll Eyes
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2007, 11:52:06 AM »

I was thinking of building a HF lojac system with 4 6830s.
It would be cool to get the matching DF processor

Bruce. spark gap machine....a big one
Logged
WU2D
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1800


CW is just a narrower version of AM


« Reply #17 on: June 28, 2007, 12:44:44 PM »

Luft Der Zeppelin!

HF DF on high angle of arrival signals is very hard to do.

Thus the value when you can do it.

Mike WU2D
Logged

These are the good old days of AM
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #18 on: June 28, 2007, 01:10:43 PM »

The trig and geometry limitations are what make it hard. No one I know can do it with any significant accuracy, at least when compared to lower angle of arrival signals. A large baseline on the DF stations is very important.
Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #19 on: June 28, 2007, 01:28:52 PM »

Bruce. spark gap machine....a big one

Frank, what do you think about a Poulsen Arc transmitter?
Labeled as "1000" KW in photo.



Logged
WU2D
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1800


CW is just a narrower version of AM


« Reply #20 on: June 28, 2007, 02:49:17 PM »

The trig and geometry limitations are what make it hard. No one I know can do it with any significant accuracy, at least when compared to lower angle of arrival signals. A large baseline on the DF stations is very important.

Conventional amplitude based systems which use monopoles do not work because all of the antennas will see about the same incident signal. This rules out many systems such as Watson-Watt and most conventional ham systems such as psuedo doppler (as used by LoJacK by the way).

If you can accurately measure phase and amplitude, and have good antennas it becomes possible to DF even high vertical incidence signals. Theoretically a zero phase angle would mean it is directly overhead! Steve You are correct - not easy..

Mike WU2D
Logged

These are the good old days of AM
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #21 on: June 28, 2007, 04:03:33 PM »

Quote
If you can accurately measure phase and amplitude, and have good antennas it becomes possible to DF even high vertical incidence signals. Theoretically a zero phase angle would mean it is directly overhead! Steve You are correct - not easy..


And this is only for a single ray solution! Add in multiple rays (aoa's, phase, etc) and it gets even more tricky. That's why you get paid the big bucks!
Logged
WA1QHQ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 111



« Reply #22 on: June 28, 2007, 04:11:10 PM »

Chris,

I check in to this net as well and it just sounds like dah dah dah dah dah dah not di di di di

I'm learning about HFDF at my new Job at DRS. They use some cool hardware to do HFDF pronounced  "HUFFDUFF".

You want HUFFDUFF my friend.

The coolest aid in HFDF is to employ iono-sounder MUF data to tell how far away the station you are DFing is. It is all done through trig. If you know what layer is reflecting you can tell how far away the station is on a single bounce on a given frequency.

Ionosounders are located worldwide and they are used for propagation study. Here is a station that gives ionosounder data http://digisonde.haystack.edu/latestFrames.htm

Mike WU2D



Mike,

Haystack is 5 minutes from my QTH no wonder some of those sounders on HF are so loud.


Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #23 on: June 28, 2007, 04:15:12 PM »

Mark there is a lot of net data on chirp sounders. TCI makes a lot of that stuff.
Logged
WU2D
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1800


CW is just a narrower version of AM


« Reply #24 on: June 28, 2007, 10:40:24 PM »

Holy cow, this one brought Mark QHQ out of the woodwork!

Get out your loops men - we will triangulate!

Actually last week I switched from my inverted L which is pretty much a blob on 80M to my 3 element vertical array which is set up pointing west right now. Western stations are much louder on this. But I could not honestly say that the beeper was better or worse so I do not think it is west. 

Mike WU2D
Logged

These are the good old days of AM
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 18 queries.