The AM Forum
April 27, 2024, 07:05:17 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Headphone Woes - Need Help !!  (Read 17719 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« on: December 08, 2006, 01:38:45 AM »

This may sound stupid, but I am having a real problem finding a *good* pair of headphones !  The pair I'm using now is no longer made.

Oh, Good means it will reproduce everything my transmitter can transmit (audio wise), and that my ears can hear.  And, with a flat response.  I want to be able to hear sub sonic breath pops, door closing thuds, people walking in the other part of the house, far off thunder.  The mic goes down to single cycles per second...so does the transmitter... the ear goes down to at least 15... why can't the headphones?  Ok, it's weird - maybe an obsession, but hear me out  Tongue

Currently, I am using an old Yamaha RH3, Note: Not the RH3-C, which is pretty bad.  Ok, back to the good old RH3s.  The RH3 has a clean, fairly flat response down to 15Hz.... yes, 15Hz.

Ok, lots of phones *claim* response down to 16, 15, 10, 6 Hz..  Well, it's bull (you know what).  The published response of the RH3 is 20-20,000Hz.  The RH3 really does it -and better.  At 15Hz it's right in there - still clean, and plenty of output.

I've tried LOTS of headphones.  My latest test was a set of Sennheiser HD485 phones.  Look good on paper.  Open phones (the sealed/closed designs really roll off), good specs, headphone.com says the freq. response is good.  Nope.  Not a chance.  Big peak at around 60Hz... rolls off pretty fast below that.  At 15Hz there was much more 30Hz energy than 15Hz energy, indicating distortion.  The impedance had a big peak at around 80Hz, then starts to fall off.  By the way, the RH3s have a flat impedance curve down to 15Hz.  I can't measure anything lower than that - my sig generator only goes to 15 :-)

I've tried Sony phones, I've tried Koss, I've tried $500 Sennheisers.  So far, everything I've tried falls apart below about 30Hz.. Some get to 20, but I can't find anything (so far), that makes it cleanly and flatly down to 15 or below (except the RH3s).

I found the RH3s by going into a high end music store, and asking the fellow there if I could try all the headphones. I told him money was no object (this was not entirely true, but I wanted to be able to try ALL of the phones available).  So, armed with my radio shack condenser mic and a portable amplifier, I started testing headphones... tried them all... stopped at the RH3.  It was the only one that would reproduce all of that low stuff.  At $49.00 (at the time, 10 years ago), it was a good buy !

Any suggestions (short of "get a life")  Shocked  ??   I can't find any new old stock of the RH3 phones.  If they say it's the RH3, it's really the RH3C, and that one has hardly any low end at all !  So a replacement must be found..

Talk later and Regards,

Steve
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2006, 07:49:02 AM »

Go to the in-ear monitors with ambient noise attenuator cushioning which keeps the transducers in place.

The placement guarantees good coupling to your ear bones.

AND you can ignore calls to go do your chores, the baby crying, etc.

Logged
N8LGU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 198



« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2006, 08:10:24 AM »

    Many years ago (maybe '70), I had a pair of Koss Pro4AA's with the liquid filled ear cusions. I can't hear down to 15cps but could hear to 24cps and I really enjoyed them. A college roommate lifted them from me. Some decades later I saw the same Koss Pro4AA model for sale and tried them. You guessed it...JUNK. The current version has cheapo ear cusions and the drivers are not transparent and clean like they used to be. As for the bass, very muddy mid bass and no reall deep bass. I am in the process of building a folded horn loudspeaker for my NC 2-40D. No more headphones as I live in the country and it's only me and the cat.
Logged

"Rock Cave Dave"
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2006, 09:42:08 AM »

I've heard Japan has a tin ear ever since we nuked them and can't hear low end so that is why it all sounds like crap.
Logged
W1DAN
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 906



« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2006, 09:56:39 AM »

Hi Steve:

I like the AKG K240 headphones. The last pair I got was for $5.00 at the Framingham flea. Open ear.

Looks like they also make a closed ear headphones..the K271 ($299.00).

I have a pair of Stax electrostatics that have amazing clarity, but do not reproduce very loud levels. Supoer clean and you need a power amp to drive them as they need lotsa voltage.

73
Dan
W1DAN

Logged
Jim, W5JO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2508


« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2006, 10:14:05 AM »

Steve can you really hear below 30 Cy?  Down there I just feel it when the kidz in cars drive by.  Lots of pressure on the body.
Logged
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2006, 10:36:15 AM »

Steve can you really hear below 30 Cy?  Down there I just feel it when the kidz in cars drive by.  Lots of pressure on the body.

Hi Jim,

Yeah, just ran the test last night on the Sennheisers.  Swept them down to 15Hz... was hearing mostly 30Hz at that point.  Plugged in the RH3 phones - could once again hear the correct tone (15Hz).  Swept the RH3 back up to 60 - nice and smooth all the way.  It really is noticable when listning on the air, also !  I ran some tests on my 15 year old and my wife.  My wife could hear well, down to about 18Hz.  My son could year down to a bit above 20.  I can hear to 15.   Smiley

Regards,

Steve


Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
W1GFH
Guest
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2006, 12:52:20 PM »

You've probably tried these, but the Sony MDR-V6 is pretty much the standard for sound mixers and location recorders in the motion picture industry, and are quite popular with the radio industry as well. Nice and comfy to wear (esp. with velour Beyer pads) if your job requires the wearing of a headset for hours at a time. Although they are not "research laboratory quality", I find they fit the bill for general purpose headphones quite nicely.
Logged
W1RKW
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4412



« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2006, 03:46:41 PM »


Grado Reference Series.
Logged

Bob
W1RKW
Home of GORT.
W2INR
Radio Syracuse
Founding
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1174

Syracuse Radio W2INR


WWW
« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2006, 04:09:50 PM »

Headphone of choice at this point in time has been the Sony MDR7506 Stereo Headphones.


Standard Features

    * Cable Length: 9.8 ft
    * Driver Unit Size: 40
    * Frequency Response: 10-20,000 Hz
    * Impedance: 24 ohms
    * Magnet Type: Neodymium
    * Plug Type: Gold
    * Sensitivity: 104
    * Type: Dynamic, closed
    * Weight: 7.8


I have been using these headphones for years.  I have three in the studio right now. I find them extremely clean on the low side and have excellent high frequency reproduction.

I think you can get them  for around $100.00. 

They are very comfortable to wear as I always use headphones here while transmitting.
Logged

G - The INR


Amateur Weather Station KNYSYRAC64
Creator - owner - AMfone.net - 2001 - 2010
Founding Member - NEAR-Fest
SWLR-RNØ54
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2006, 05:52:51 PM »

Headphone of choice at this point in time has been the Sony MDR7506 Stereo Headphones.


Standard Features

    * Cable Length: 9.8 ft
    * Driver Unit Size: 40
    * Frequency Response: 10-20,000 Hz
    * Impedance: 24 ohms
    * Magnet Type: Neodymium
    * Plug Type: Gold
    * Sensitivity: 104
    * Type: Dynamic, closed
    * Weight: 7.8


I have been using these headphones for years.  I have three in the studio right now. I find them extremely clean on the low side and have excellent high frequency reproduction.

I think you can get them  for around $100.00. 

They are very comfortable to wear as I always use headphones here while transmitting.

Wow, I just tried a pair of those - JUST - within the past hour.  They are very good, but the low end is nothing like the RH3 (sorry  Embarrassed. )

What I did was to bring the RH3, and my audio oscillator equipped with a plug and asked if I could "try out" headphones in the store.  I got the floor manager - he was very interested !! So, we tried headphones...   I have a pair of Bose phones here on trial.  They were VERY good - MAYBE better than the RH3.  Next stop is Radio Shack - they have Koss phones there.

The quest is ON !!!  I will report back.

The Sonys were good, but the low end rolled off fairly steeply below about 35Hz.  I think this is very typical for closed headphones.  The Bose phones I got have a "port" - I guess they are called "semi-closed".  Very interesting - kind of like the old Koss PRO4-A, but better.  I owned some PRO4-A phones and they strapped in the bass below 30Hz.

Talk later !!!

Regards,

Steve
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
kc2ifr
Guest
« Reply #11 on: December 08, 2006, 06:11:37 PM »

keep me posted Steve as to your next recommended head set so I can use them with your mod monitor .
Thanks,
Billr 
Logged
KF1Z
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1796


Are FETs supposed to glow like that?


« Reply #12 on: December 08, 2006, 06:28:50 PM »

keep me posted Steve as to your next recommended heat set so I can use them with your mod monitor .
Thanks,
Billr 

Yes, and you STILL won't believe how good you sound in it, eh Bill?  Grin

Logged

W2JBL
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 676


« Reply #13 on: December 10, 2006, 09:05:49 PM »

watch what you get at Radio Shack that's made by Koss. it's a different line made just for the Shack, as i found out from Koss. i fell for this a couple years ago when i bought Koss Pro4AA's there. they sounded good enough, but the wiring between between the cans failed in a week. rewired them, and they have been Ok for two years. that is until recently the low frequency response just died below 100 HZ. they sound strangely distorted now too. never again! found a 25$ pair of Sony cans at the local Border's that are quite good. it's the Sony MDR-XD100. good sound on the cheap. by the way does anybody know why all these phones are ALL wierd impedences that don't match any know equipment? it's a huge pain iin the rear for me. 
Logged
WU2D
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1800


CW is just a narrower version of AM


« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2006, 09:10:00 PM »

Oh Steve!


* Steveheadphones.jpg (21.41 KB, 360x540 - viewed 571 times.)
Logged

These are the good old days of AM
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #15 on: December 12, 2006, 10:57:20 PM »

Ok - more on my tests !!

I have tried a number of headphones recently.  Probably 10 different types of all sizes, shapes and prices.  So far, nothing is working out...

The absolute best headphone I've used so far is the Bose Tri-Port OE (On Ear).  These little headphones are wonderous !! The best low end of any of them, so far. ... Incredible - flat down to lower than I can hear (15Hz).  Powerful and clean... nice smooth high end, too.

Unfortunately, the Tri-Port (or any sealed headphone) doesn't work very well in an application where one is speaking and listening.

When using any type of sealed headphone, I have noticed that there is an effect similar to putting your hands over your ears.  You can
hear yourself very well in the midrange when speaking.  It is very distracting (at least to me).  The effect causes a big mid-bass peak when listening to one's self in the phones while talking..  The open air phones don't do this...

So, I've modified my quest to open air phones only.  I tried another pair of Sennheisers today.  They were almost acceptable, but still not nearly as good as the RH3 Yamahas (no longer made - beware of the RH3C - it's not the same product!!).  So, I'm still looking (and listening).

I feel like the man with the lantern  Wink

Regards,

Steve
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
KB2WIG
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4484



« Reply #16 on: December 13, 2006, 10:19:37 AM »

"I have noticed that there is an effect similar to putting your hands over your ears.  You can
hear yourself very well in the midrange when speaking"

Have you tried mixing some of your transmitter audio  ( or an off-the-air sample) back into your cans?  maybee this'll help....   klc
Logged

What? Me worry?
Mike/W8BAC
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1042



WWW
« Reply #17 on: January 23, 2007, 07:55:52 PM »

So... Steve. What have you found? What is the best open ear headphone set so far? Did you replace the old Yamahas. I need a set as well so your input is important

Mike
Logged
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #18 on: January 23, 2007, 11:20:09 PM »

Mine are Yamaha YH-2.  I bought them about 25 years ago for about $50.  They are comfortable enough that I can wear them for hours almost without being aware that I have them on.  Some of the plastic is deteriorating, but they still work well.

The bass is not bad, but still nothing to write home about.  Otherwise they sound clean and transparent.  They are the only headphones I have ever owned that didn't feel like a clamp screwed down on my head over my ears.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
W1VD
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 401



« Reply #19 on: January 24, 2007, 08:55:21 AM »

Steve

http://www.gradolabs.com

Might be worth discussing your requirements with their engineering department - at least you may glean some worthwhile information. Think you hit the nail on the head in your original post - flat impedance extending down low.

Would like to hear your results.

Jay W1VD
Logged

'Tnx Fer the Dope OM'.
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #20 on: January 24, 2007, 09:28:18 AM »

Steve

http://www.gradolabs.com

Might be worth discussing your requirements with their engineering department - at least you may glean some worthwhile information. Think you hit the nail on the head in your original post - flat impedance extending down low.

Would like to hear your results.

Jay W1VD

Hi Jay, good suggestion !

Here is my letter to Grado - I'll let you know !
Hi !

I, and a number of my colleagues are in need of headphones with an extended low frequency response (at least to 15hZ) and that we can wear while speaking into a microphone - so they MUST be of an open design to prevent the "hands over your ears" echo/resonance effect one gets while taking.

What I am about to say may sound strange, but I have a perfectly good pair of headphones that meets the requirements, however they are no longer available.  These are $49.00 headphones from Yamaha, the RH3 (****NOT THE RH3-C, which is a different product ****).  I need a replacement for these relatively inexpensive headphones, and I have found NOTHING that works.  A number of my colleagues are in the same boat.

The problem is a lack of DEEP low end response, and also a mid-bass peak which seems to be present is all the (open back) phones I've tried.

The application is in-studio, listening to one's self while talking.  The equipment in use has exceptional frequency response - flat from 10 to 20kHz, and we need to be able to hear all of it.  The purpose is not to remove the extreme low end, but to be able to hear it.  The microphones have response to the single digits.  Things like people waking across a floor, far away helicopters, trucks going past the building (very low frequency) and breath / speaking artifacts need to be able to be heard correctly.

I have tried at least 10 different headphones, in all price ranges and styles from all the top manufacturers.  I have only tried one Grado, and the response of that particular set was not remarkable below 30hZ.  Unfortunately, I do not remember the model number.  It was at a music store in Nashua, NH.

My in-store testing consists of an audio oscillator / amplifier.  I sweep down to 10hZ - listening for peaks in the response or roll off.  Of course, I bring the  "reference" headphones (the RH3s) with me to show what I'm looking for.

Oh, I *HAVE* found some **closed** headphones that would work just fine.  The Bose TriPort OE is very good to 10hZ, and the highs are superb.  Unfortunately, this is a closed design and therefore unusable.

Someone recommended I write to you folks, as you are experts and may have a solution / suggestion.  I would think I could replace $49.00 headphones with something as good or better :-)

Let me know what you think or any of your products would be suitable.

Talk later and Regards,

Steve


 
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
W1JS
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 225



« Reply #21 on: January 24, 2007, 10:28:49 AM »

Steve,

Quote
My wife could hear well, down to about 18Hz.  My son could year down to a bit above 20.  I can hear to 15.

I guess you truly must be a baby "boomer"...

Logged

73 de
W1JS
Jack
No. Weare NH
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5055


« Reply #22 on: January 24, 2007, 10:58:09 AM »

I heard that a 30 cycle note can make you lose control of your bowels and vaaavooom (true or false?)
Fred
Down hill we go on this thread. I'm like the SSBer who sets up a QSO 3 kc from an AM QSO.......hi
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #23 on: January 24, 2007, 05:49:59 PM »

What exactly is the difference between open and closed headphones?

I am aware of 3 types.

(1) The old fashioned "head clamps", where the hard bakelite earpieces press down on both ears.  Wearing those things for more than a few minutes is pure torture.

(2)  The type with ear pads that surround the ear, so that the pressure is on the skull bones, but not the ears.  They are usually padded with foam or other soft material.  The pads form an air seal around the ears to cut out outside noise.  My Yamaha phones are of this variety.

(3)  The type like what comes with a Walkman or other partable audio device.  The ear pieces clamp directly on the ear, but the phones are very lightweight and the pressure not great enough to cause discomfort.  The ear pieces are made of something like foam rubber that is porous enough to allow air to flow freely.  The phones make no seal with the ear, so it is like listening with a small speaker near, but not pressed against the ear, and outside noises are clearly audible.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
Mike/W8BAC
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1042



WWW
« Reply #24 on: January 24, 2007, 07:33:39 PM »

Don, the open ear/air type cans have holes through the ear cups to allow sound and air from the room in. In some cases the manufactures call it ventilation for long periods of use. Others call them sound ports for studio awareness.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 18 queries.