flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
 Offline
Posts: 3977
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2012, 07:53:10 PM » |
|
Not a clip lead in sight.........
Too much order there for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
W3RSW
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 2107
Rick & "Roosevelt"
|
|
« Reply #26 on: April 22, 2012, 11:21:25 AM » |
|
Ich bin ein Beerlinear...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
RICK *W3RSW*
|
|
|
KM1H
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 3489
|
|
« Reply #27 on: April 22, 2012, 11:56:07 AM » |
|
Hmmm, my German ancestors must have been polluted with French blood; I find that level of neatness very disturbing  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Opcom
Radio NRK - KD5OEI, Dallas, TX
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4460
PG-10-22028 (RADAR Endorsement Sold Separately).
|
|
« Reply #28 on: April 22, 2012, 01:15:52 PM » |
|
That square 90 degree meter is where the big $ is.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
what?
|
|
|
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 3666
|
|
« Reply #29 on: April 23, 2012, 02:44:48 PM » |
|
The good thing about this rig is that it does not require a computer to run. Such devices like that are 90s designs and holdovers from Linux fans.
I like the looks but some colors are way out of hand. If Dr. Rohde worked on it, I bet it performs wonderfuly. $17K to some is like the rest of us walking over and buying a soda from a machine. Some of the R-S radios top 50,000. This might be a bargain.
C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 1694
|
|
« Reply #30 on: April 23, 2012, 07:51:52 PM » |
|
The PT8000A is a no-holes barred state-of-the-art dream transceiver design.
Attached is a pdf of the block diagram from 5 years ago.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
73 de Tom WA3KLR AMI # 77 Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
|
|
|
Opcom
Radio NRK - KD5OEI, Dallas, TX
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4460
PG-10-22028 (RADAR Endorsement Sold Separately).
|
|
« Reply #31 on: April 23, 2012, 08:02:44 PM » |
|
Not knocking it. Just can't make full use of its specs in this somewhat noisy place.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
what?
|
|
|
KM1H
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 3489
|
|
« Reply #32 on: April 23, 2012, 09:01:44 PM » |
|
Thats the 2 receivers and it has 2M but no 6M. Was ist mit dem?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11157
|
|
« Reply #33 on: April 23, 2012, 09:33:24 PM » |
|
I'd like to see how Rob Sherwood rates it. I prefer the DSP a little closer to the antenna myself. It does have a cool preselector design.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
W1VD
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 395
|
|
« Reply #34 on: April 23, 2012, 10:04:56 PM » |
|
The 2 kHz IMD test may not go so well ...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Tnx Fer the Dope OM'.
|
|
|
vincent
Member
Offline
Posts: 136
|
|
« Reply #35 on: April 24, 2012, 06:12:57 AM » |
|
This was a state of the art transceiver from the mid sixties:  |
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" - Leonardo da Vinci
|
|
|
K6JEK
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 950
RF in the shack
|
|
« Reply #36 on: April 24, 2012, 10:30:38 AM » |
|
This was a state of the art transceiver from the mid sixties: That's a new one for me. Were any of these things actually built? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11157
|
|
« Reply #37 on: April 24, 2012, 10:42:26 AM » |
|
I'd like to have that preselector ahead of my HPSDR
Anything with a synthesizer driving a mixer is going to be an issue with 2kHz IMD. Dual conversion is even harder. Typical analog RX is doing good if you hit 80dB. Heck the synthesizer in the Racal 6830 has sidebands down only 90 dB at 2 kHz on a good day. Shoot that through a mixer and it gets worse.
I bet this is a very cool rig but the design is not current. just like the FTDX5000 which copies mil rigs of the '80s with a 40.455 kHz first IF and 455 kHz second IF. hanging a DSP on the end.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
W2VW
Contributing
Member
 Online
Posts: 2846
|
|
« Reply #38 on: April 24, 2012, 10:55:04 AM » |
|
This was a state of the art transceiver from the mid sixties: Is that Les Babcock? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11157
|
|
« Reply #39 on: April 24, 2012, 11:06:19 AM » |
|
no Stinky Babcock
Hey Dave I had one of my SS amps on 75 this past weekend
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
W2VW
Contributing
Member
Online
Posts: 2846
|
|
« Reply #41 on: April 24, 2012, 11:37:18 AM » |
|
no Stinky Babcock
Hey Dave I had one of my SS amps on 75 this past weekend
The cat? Great! I used one of my SS amps to heat the shack the other day. 51v 4a 0 sig plus server switcher wastes just enough to take the edge off. Have you updated the parameters with the group? Irb would be proud. Not smug. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Steve - K4HX
Guest
|
|
« Reply #42 on: April 25, 2012, 09:54:15 AM » |
|
I prefer to have my IMD much wider than 2 kHz.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11157
|
|
« Reply #43 on: April 25, 2012, 11:16:20 AM » |
|
Heros not bad but I would like to see a higher Q. 2 of them in series with a bit of gain in the middle would be very cool. Above 15 MHz pretty wide. Maybe it doesn't matter who knows.
The design is similar to the smug front end.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KL7OF
Member
Offline
Posts: 1521
|
|
« Reply #44 on: April 25, 2012, 11:42:28 AM » |
|
This was a state of the art transceiver from the mid sixties: "The B-500 plate modulator is an accessory" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I'm just a hack artist......and you should never listen to anything I say
|
|
|
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 3666
|
|
« Reply #45 on: April 26, 2012, 12:06:18 AM » |
|
I was looking into a solution to kill off noise and stop BCB interferance. That looked neat. Pricey yes. C Heros not bad but I would like to see a higher Q. 2 of them in series with a bit of gain in the middle would be very cool. Above 15 MHz pretty wide. Maybe it doesn't matter who knows.
The design is similar to the smug front end.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
