THis is an R390. Not an R390A.
Good to see you know the difference. That puts you ahead of many.
Todd, I would rather the rig run like it was supposed to. Its just preference. I will do it if my tube is bad. I have to work tomorrow but I will devote some more time to this thing and report back
And that's just it - you'll be running it the same either way. The ballast concept was only added to deal with the 'what ifs' of overseas duty. But as I said, it's nice to stuff a resistor in there and be able to swap it back to the 3TF7 in a few minutes without hassle if the mood hits you. Otherwise it perks away just fine, a hair more stable, and you won't be having to haul it out of the cabinet in a year or so for another $35 band aid as Johnny sez. Think of the 3TF7s you'll be helping to conserve!!
And the R-390As were often used in RTTY circuits where frequency stability was critical.
Ohyestheywere. As with their predecessors. In fact, ASA had a field mod which added those nifty neat-o verniers to the BFO knob for more accurate retuning. Really slows down the BFO tuning rate a lot. They carried it forward when the A models hit the scene, but most of the ones I've come across were on R-390s.
The nomenclature escapes me at the moment, but they had a specific RATT/RTTY set up that utilized a pair of autotune R-391s with a matching antenna/preselector tuning unit, power supply, and diversity unit. FRR-33 or something like that, Johnny probably knows. A rack full of dials spinning away whenever you changed frequency.