The AM Forum
April 25, 2024, 11:12:45 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 [4]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: AM Transmitter Rally Final Proposal based on all input - PLEASE COMMENT!  (Read 53191 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
KF1Z
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1796


Are FETs supposed to glow like that?


« Reply #75 on: January 09, 2010, 03:39:21 PM »

On final comment, then I say no more about this, or any other topic.

I looked back through some old threads...
I found all the answers I need.


Still curious about the QRP  limit for the rally though.....
It was a real question, after all.

bye

Logged

k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #76 on: January 09, 2010, 08:08:52 PM »

Don,

I'm curious -  I assume you're using I squared R to figure power with the current meters and openwire line?  How do you come up with an accurate "R" to use for the calculation?

Or do you also measure voltage across the line with a floating scope probe and use E X I ?

Into calibrated dummy load, use Ohm's law: IČR.  With the open wire tuned feeders, adjust for maximum deflection while making sure the tubes stay safely within CCS ratings.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #77 on: January 09, 2010, 08:27:16 PM »

Five watts DC input to the final amplifier. There, it's settled.


On final comment, then I say no more about this, or any other topic.

I looked back through some old threads...
I found all the answers I need.


Still curious about the QRP  limit for the rally though.....
It was a real question, after all.

bye


Logged
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2845



WWW
« Reply #78 on: January 09, 2010, 10:06:32 PM »

Rob,

good sig last night into WV.

Don, rig is fixed. needed 3 mica caps changed and new finals.
Hey Derb, tnx but you worked the w. coast -- you da man!
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #79 on: January 09, 2010, 11:13:17 PM »


Still curious about the QRP  limit for the rally though.....
It was a real question, after all.

Hmmmmmmmm..... QRP limit for the rally?  No limits here  Wink   CRANK UP THE WICK  Grin
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #80 on: January 09, 2010, 11:17:22 PM »

Flea market is the folowing weekend right?
Logged
N3DRB The Derb
Guest
« Reply #81 on: January 10, 2010, 01:16:44 AM »

Rob,

my station is still pretty JS IMO but it's a lot less JS than it was. Even with setbacks the long term trendline is on the upside for sure. Time for some good 180 proof white lightning homebrew transmitter making.  Cool

working Cal on 75 AM is more exciting to me than working ZedL on 75 slopbucket which I did when I was toyin around with DX for a year in the mid 80's. more sense of accomplishment.

I wish ARRL would issue AM endorsements for WAS, WAC, etc.
Logged
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #82 on: January 10, 2010, 08:08:52 AM »

Flea market is the folowing weekend right?
Right !
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8166


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #83 on: January 10, 2010, 02:17:41 PM »


I wish ARRL would issue AM endorsements for WAS, WAC, etc.

There is for WAS. See
http://www.arrl.org/awards/was/wasapp.pdf
This has been in existence for about the last 7 or 8 years.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #84 on: January 11, 2010, 07:43:35 AM »

Hey Brian (W5HRO) - that's a class E modulation graphic  Wink  Here's another one from the same group.  I didn't think that one was out there anymore.  Use it in good health  Grin

Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2845



WWW
« Reply #85 on: January 11, 2010, 08:38:39 AM »

Hey Brian (W5HRO) - that's a class E modulation graphic  Wink 

That modulation was so extreme that I first mistakenly thought it was slopbucket Huh  and i thought "What's Brian doin'?" 

Derb, maybe with the new/old low band L tuna I'll have a shot at the clip lead award Cheesy
No doubt working west coast on AM requires optimizing on several fronts, makes working DX with slopbucket seem like shooting fish in a barrel.


Rob
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
K1JJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8893


"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz


« Reply #86 on: January 11, 2010, 12:07:21 PM »

I'm curious - WITHOUT a reference picture of the unmodulated AM carrier, (or carrier lines drawn in) there is no way to know if that modulated waveform picture shows modulation of 100%, 200%. 300% or 400%, etc., positive peaks, correct?  Or is there a way by reverse detective work?

BTW, the pic above shows the classic "shark fins"  waveform we often talk about associated with a transmitter that will cleanly pass extreme lows effectively.   I find this polarity is only possible using a rig that will do this.

T
Logged

Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth  +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed.  Easily done in DSP.

Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."

There's nothing like an old dog.
Bill, KD0HG
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2563

304-TH - Workin' it


« Reply #87 on: January 11, 2010, 02:03:04 PM »

Tom, the unmodulated carrier is shown in both of Steve's pictures...It is 2 divisions 'tall'..

100% mod is 4 divisions tall, as it should be, or 2x voltage, 200% is 6 divisions, or 3x the carrier.
Logged
N3DRB The Derb
Guest
« Reply #88 on: January 11, 2010, 02:12:24 PM »

Quote
There is for WAS.

wow. who got enlightened I wonder? I'll have to go out for that. When the sunspots return it will be not that hard.

condx have to be about perfect for a "average 100 watt" am station to work coast to coast on 75. my report was a 3X5 and I gave him a 4X5 - no doubt having a antenna made for such things would help a lot.
Logged
KF1Z
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1796


Are FETs supposed to glow like that?


« Reply #89 on: January 11, 2010, 02:17:12 PM »

Tom, the unmodulated carrier is shown in both of Steve's pictures...It is 2 divisions 'tall'..

100% mod is 4 divisions tall, as it should be, or 2x voltage, 200% is 6 divisions, or 3x the carrier.

I think it was more of a general question, relating more to W5HRO's avatar, than to Steve's pictures.



Logged

K1JJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8893


"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz


« Reply #90 on: January 11, 2010, 02:50:30 PM »

Tom, the unmodulated carrier is shown in both of Steve's pictures...It is 2 divisions 'tall'..

100% mod is 4 divisions tall, as it should be, or 2x voltage, 200% is 6 divisions, or 3x the carrier.


Yep, that's right, Bill.

But what I'm axing is if there was no "2 divisions tall" reference of an unmodulated carrier, are there clues in that 200% modulated waveform that it's more than 100% modulated?  IE, does the height of 200% modulation appear different than a 100% modulated waveform in shape, form, etc.   I always thought not, but wanted some other opinions.

I'm looking for someone to say, "No, you can't estimate  the % of modulation when using a negative peak limiter with over 100%  positive peaks without an unmodulated  reference carrier to look at. There are no telltale signs."  (Or are there?)

T
Logged

Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth  +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed.  Easily done in DSP.

Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."

There's nothing like an old dog.
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8166


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #91 on: January 11, 2010, 04:43:38 PM »

Quote
There is for WAS.

wow. who got enlightened I wonder? I'll have to go out for that. When the sunspots return it will be not that hard.

condx have to be about perfect for a "average 100 watt" am station to work coast to coast on 75. my report was a 3X5 and I gave him a 4X5 - no doubt having a antenna made for such things would help a lot.

Back in the early days of the new 21st century (early months of 2003) , WA3VJB, K3MSB, and myself danced with several Directors and ARRL staff on this issue.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
N3DRB The Derb
Guest
« Reply #92 on: January 11, 2010, 05:21:59 PM »

Thank you for your efforts.  Cheesy Anything that de-marginalizes AM activity from the wider spectrum is a good thing. I'll start going out for the award soon as I get some new QSL cards made.
Logged
Bill, KD0HG
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2563

304-TH - Workin' it


« Reply #93 on: January 11, 2010, 06:13:14 PM »

All I can say is an AM signal modulated 200% positive is going to sound awful on an envelope, or diode detector, but OK on a synchronous or product detector.

Once you go past 125% positive peaks, it looks great on a peak-reading wattmeter, but it ain't very good sounding AM. It's DSB with a bit of carrier.

Yeah, technology allows you to do 200% positive peaks, but you don't want to if the listeners are using traditional AM detectors.

We don't need to sound like SSB contesters, IMO.

FWIW, a few AM stations going to 200%-400% positive modulation is one reason why the FCC made the law 1.5KW PEP output, screwing all of us. Sorry, 10 KW PEP of DSB didn't cut it.
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #94 on: January 11, 2010, 07:27:36 PM »

Bill,
You have been strapping the past few days.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 [4]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.065 seconds with 18 queries.