The AM Forum
April 27, 2024, 04:30:57 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: In Defense of West Coast Sound  (Read 22717 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
K6JEK
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1189


RF in the shack


« on: December 04, 2007, 05:12:07 PM »

In another thread, someone implied that maybe what you're hearing out West is terrible but we're pretty good back here in the East. And that you are. I've listened to many of you.

But gosh, we aren't so bad either. The unofficial King of West Coast Sound is Mike Dorrough, known to all of us as No Money for his call KO6NM. He has gently coaxed us to what I now think of as pretty respectable audio. The standard bearers of West Coast sound are first and foremost Mike himself but also many tall ship stations who have tried to sound as good as everyone does when they use Mike's station.  Since Mike isn't here to defend himself, I'll define WCS as simply natural. None of the knobs are turned to eleven. There is imperceptible compression and no over emphasis anywhere. If there is a difference between East Coast Sound and West Coast Sound I'd say it's in the low end. We roll it off more than you guys in the east. We like the highs. We just do. That's the way we are.

Here are some stations you might be able to hear back east that are representative of West Coast Sound. Listen for them on 75 and judge for yourself:  Mike, KO6NM, Brian, NI6Q, Dave WJ6W, Joe, N6DVD, Joe, W1GFH if he'd ever get on the air,  Ron, W6OM, George WA6HCX, and even my station, K6JEK, if someone else with a better voice is in front of the microphone.   If you still don't like it, then,  well shucks.
Logged
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2007, 05:18:22 PM »

I don't think there's a grievance here. One person put forth an opinion and may have expected everyone to nod.

Among the responses, I don't see anything that maligns any category of people, by geography, type of transmitter or operating style.

No one defended individuals with technical shortcomings in their signal, and it's clearly a matter of opinion what flavor of audio satisfies a given person.

I remember some years ago there was a guy, John Staples, W6BM, who does not participate in any of these discussions these days, but was writing for Electric Radio about broadcast transmitters and improved audio for amateur transmitters.

In some of his writings, he presented a technically sustainable case for methods to lower distortion and to bring out a more natural sound, coming away from "space shuttle audio" that some amateur transmitters imparted.

But in the same article(s), he expressed a sentiment that I took as apologetic, or defensive about such methods, hewing to the discredited "spectrum conservation' line that was used as a weapon to promote SSB when the mode was struggling for acceptance.

He got quite belligerent in correspondence with me, a sort of how-dare-I-question-him thing that puzzles me to this day.

So, there are people out there, like him, who are of two minds -- they grasp and endorse the idea of improved audio, but then make excuses or find themselves unable for some philosophical reason to pursue it.

I mean, I don't particularly care if someone prefers pinched and narrow audio, but don't also preach to me that I should adopt that approach or endorse it as being "better" as an automatic assumption.
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2007, 05:37:18 PM »

WEST Coast KW as the west coast was known for its strappers and a better handbook
Logged
Bill, KD0HG
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2563

304-TH - Workin' it


« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2007, 05:41:37 PM »


So, there are people out there, like him, who are of two minds -- they grasp and endorse the idea of improved audio, but then make excuses or find themselves unable for some philosophical reason to pursue it.

I mean, I don't particularly care if someone prefers pinched and narrow audio, but don't also preach to me that I should adopt that approach or endorse it as being "better" as an automatic assumption.

Distortion: When what come out is not a replica of what goes in.

Audio processing is the science/art of deliberately distorting audio to achieve a desired effect.
There is no such thing as distortionless radio.

Like making chili, not everyone agrees on the 'best' recipe and not everyone is equally skilled as a cook. The idea is to try different things and learn. There is NO cookbook setting of the knobs that is correct! If one existed, then every radio station on the dial would sound equally good, which we know isn't the case.
 I will say that when Mike KO6NM says someone's audio sounds pretty good, it's something to be framed on the wall.
Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2007, 07:10:18 PM »

Both are largely myths. No one sounds or type of audio is used by enough stations on either coast to make such generalizations.

I've worked quite a few of the stations you listed Jon, and I liked the audio from all of them. I do recall WJ6W having more low end than others, but that could just be his voice.

The only real west coast sound I ever heard was the Bakersfield Sound.
Logged
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4619



« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2007, 08:01:58 PM »

No need to defend anything, Jon.   The beauty of ham radio (and indeed AM) is that you can pursue whatever aspect of it that piques your interest - audio, homebrewing, solid state, tubes, antenners, whatever.  The only bad thing is overmudulated and splattering signals, that cause trouble for others on the band.  So long as anyone isn't diminishing my fun, what can I possibly say against it?
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2007, 08:10:15 PM »

West Coast sound?

The Beach Boys
CCR
Jefferson Airplane
Grateful Dead

East Coast Sound

Hendrix
Blues Project
The Band
Dylan


etc...

...what was the question?

 Grin Grin

                WBear2GCR
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2007, 08:29:49 PM »

The Bakersfield Sound predates all those.
Logged
AF9J
Guest
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2007, 08:35:37 PM »

Gee, what about the Seattle Sound?  Surely it has some worth. Wink

Ellen - AF9J
Logged
K6JEK
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1189


RF in the shack


« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2007, 08:44:33 PM »

West Coast sound?

The Beach Boys
CCR
Jefferson Airplane
Grateful Dead

East Coast Sound

Hendrix
Blues Project
The Band
Dylan


etc...

...what was the question?

 Grin Grin

                WBear2GCR
Hendrix?   There's a museum in Seattle that has another name but might as well be called the Jimi Hendrix Memorial. He was a Seattle kid who had to go to England to get any respect. 

We should be careful here. We could start a thread that goes on and on naming rock bands.   I will tell one little story though. My wife of a zillion years was waiting at the butcher counter at the local Whole Paycheck when she overheard the young guys working the counter talking about how in awe they were of Hendrix. When it was her turn she said simply, I saw him in '69 at the Berkeley Community Theater. They were awestruck. They were talking to someone who actually saw Hendrix.   

And to think I never did see him. Saw the (long list) though.
Logged
AF9J
Guest
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2007, 08:53:19 PM »

Hendrix?   There's a museum in Seattle that has another name but might as well be called the Jimi Hendrix Memorial. He was a Seattle kid who had to go to England to get any respect. 


The museum is called the Experience Music Project Museum (based upon the name of James Marshall Hendrix' group - The Jimi Hendrix Experience).

73,
Ellen - AF9J
Who also likes that other Seattle music (from the early 90s) 
Logged
Bill, KD0HG
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2563

304-TH - Workin' it


« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2007, 09:16:54 PM »

I saw Hendrix live in Chicago a long, long, time ago.

The thing I remember most (LOL!!!) was the backsides of his wall of Marshall tube amps. He'd start wailing and those tubes would be strobing red along with the tunes.

Near the end, he poured lighter fluid on his guitar and torched it. I should have took the carcass home with me, Id be retired now thanks to Ebay.

Damn good show.
Logged
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2007, 09:30:16 PM »

The Bakersfield Sound predates all those.



I had to look it up.
VERY cool history.

Logged
AF9J
Guest
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2007, 09:33:16 PM »

I saw Hendrix live in Chicago a long, long, time ago.

The thing I remember most (LOL!!!) was the backsides of his wall of Marshall tube amps. He'd start wailing and those tubes would be strobing red along with the tunes.

Near the end, he poured lighter fluid on his guitar and torched it. I should have took the carcass home with me, Id be retired now thanks to Ebay.

Damn good show.

You got that right Bill.  I think in the past year or two, one of his axes went for over $300K.  The reason - Hendrix guitars are rare on the ground, because he usually smashed them and/or torched them.  Zappa owned one of his Strats (given to him after Jimi torched it in Miami in 1969).  The Hard Rock Cafe owns his prized left handed Flying V.  Billy Gibbons of ZZ Top owns a pink Strat that Jimi gave him in 1967 or 68, when Billy's psychedelic band the Moving Sidewalks, was opening for Jimi's US tour (Jimi told Billy that the color pink wasn't conducive to burning or smashing, so he didn't want the guitar).  There are maybe 3 or 4 known other Hendrix guitars.  That's it.

73,
Ellen - AF9J
Logged
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2007, 09:40:30 PM »

Electric Ladyland... NYC.  fwiw.

                _-_-WBear2GCR
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2007, 10:07:32 PM »

In another thread, someone implied that maybe what you're hearing out West is terrible but we're pretty good back here in the East. And that you are. I've listened to many of you.
[snip]


Hi Jon,

Back in the early '70s, there was a cluster of AMers (including myself) who were running what was, at the time, very high fidelity audio.  The low end was pronounced as compared to most of the stations on the air, and the audio was clean.  At that time, it was rather an anomaly as compared to most stations on the air.  These stations were constantly being compared to WBZ and other broadcasters.  The term "Just like a broadcast station" was often heard.  This was because the good sounding stations really stood out.

Because of the clustering of these stations on the East coast - and in New England, in particular, combined with the high power (a full KW back then) , the "sound" was dubbed the East Coast Sound.  I clearly remember some of the W8 and W9 stations calling my audio the East Coast Audio.

What is really interesting - I have many high fidelity recordings of the stations from back in that time.  We sure sound better today, although at the time what we had was the best available.  Now, it's amazing how many stations sound good today.  We take it for granted now, but back then, most people had communications quality audio, and only the technically astute sounded good.

Now-> Fast forward 35 years, and the so-called East Coast Sound is really a United States Sound.  We just sound good, and it's all over the country - East, West, South, and North.  You don't often hear people comparing our sound to broadcast stations, because so many people sound so good, it's not unusual.  Now, it's the opposite.  If someone sounds bad, THAT'S what is pointed out.  Interesting shift , for sure!!!

Regards,

Steve
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
W1GFH
Guest
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2007, 11:38:47 PM »

Jon, mea culpa for not being on the air for eons due to work issues, antenna issues, travel issues, you name it. Having spent significant time on both coasts, I must comment on the subject.

I think it is time to admit that the trophy goes to the the East Coast for popularizing the 75 meter "broadcast quality audio trend" simply by virtue of having so many AM stations experimenting with it in the early 70s and 80s; a trend which grew exponentially and shows no signs of abating. Call it the "E Coast Sound" if you wish, but it's a confusing term since high quality AM audio has spread to every part of the country.

But I have to add, there *are* separate East Coast and West Coast "sounds", and it has nothing to do with audio. It has everything do with content and operating styles.

East Coast AM (especially in the AM window around New England) can often sound like a raucous CB channel, lots of sex, drugs, and rock and roll; fast break-in, hooting, burping, and spurious comments inserted by 3rd parties during transmissions using the "zero beat the other fellows carrier" method. And "personalities" galore! (It goes without saying that the AM stylings of WA1HLR had a lot to do with this evolution). East Coast AM is sometimes rude and crude but always fun.

By contrast, the West Coast is a blast from the past; strict rotations in roundtables, calmly-delivered buzzardly musings on technical subjects sprinkled with "hi hi fine business old man" manners.

One night while tuned to 3870 I was witness to a roundtable of four "tall ship" AM stations whose entire QSO consisted of exchanging compliments with each other! They extemporized for at least a half hour each on how wonderful the AM hobby is and how nice it was to gather on the air together with such good friends. And they were quite sincere.

No swearing. The word "ass" is never used, and I have never heard the f-bomb. Or even the word "damn", come to think of it. The FCC regs of the Newton Minow era are still in effect in this time warp.  And if you listen hard enough, you can almost picture the ops wearing bow ties.

There are a dozen or so tall ships, but also a fair representation of "D 104 audio" and 100 watt carriers. Ops with "telephone audio" will sometimes be told "your audio sounds restricted" but most often they are given a "good communications quality audio" report with no sneer attached. It's a fairly liberal (original meaning, not political meaning) attitude that accepts every kind of signal into the QSO.

I ascribe this open-arms-policy to the "frontier" atmosphere of the West Coast AM window. Surrounded by savages, we hardy few band together, lest we (the AM minority) be run off our reservation.

Anyway, this is how it was when I was on the air A LOT, and the current state of affairs may be different.

Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #17 on: December 05, 2007, 06:42:30 AM »

The hi-fi sounds on the east coast started well before the early 70's.

Bill, W3DUQ is still on the air with hi-fi audio. Listen for him on 3733 kHz.


QSL from 1957, TNX to Ken, W2DTC.


* 1957-1021-w3duq-qsl.jpg (68.34 KB, 800x514 - viewed 404 times.)
Logged
WD8BIL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4410


« Reply #18 on: December 05, 2007, 07:44:55 AM »

Quote
Gee, what about the Seattle Sound?  Surely it has some worth.

Wow ... coast to coast on the AM Forum.

But here in flyover country we have the Chicago Blues !!!

Yup...... "Sweet Home Chicago" !!!
Logged
N3DRB The Derb
Guest
« Reply #19 on: December 05, 2007, 07:57:17 AM »

their gonna put me in the movies;
their gonna make a big star out of me;
They'll make a movie bout a man whose sad and lonely;
and all I gotta do, is act naturally.

RIP Buck.  Cry




Oh yeah - how about everyone runs their station the way they like? I'm not telling the digital folks their too narrow, or the SSTV guys they all should be in color.

unless its satire or for funnies, everyone just mind your own business and do what you wanna do. I come back on and I hear the EXACT same rap i heard 5 yrs ago, even though the fone band been vastly expanded and entire band sections are like ghost towns.  It's like nothing ever happened.  Tongue Roll Eyes

Logged
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #20 on: December 05, 2007, 08:04:46 AM »

Wow, noticing the QSL card is from 50 years ago, and "Uncle Willie" was only 17 ...

The hi-fi sounds on the east coast started well before the early 70's.
Bill, W3DUQ is still on the air with hi-fi audio. Listen for him on 3733 kHz.
QSL from 1957, TNX to Ken, W2DTC.


Logged
Todd, KA1KAQ
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4312


AMbassador


« Reply #21 on: December 05, 2007, 11:43:32 AM »

I had the distinct pleasure of working Mike Dorrough and several other left-coasters last February, late at night on the edge of the AM ghetto (3870). They had wonderfully clean, full audio and we carried on for the better part of two hours. My main intent was to make the contact and get out of the way, not interfere with their roundtable. But they insisted I stick around, and we had a wonderful exchange.

Joe has highlighted some of the differences in operating styles and perhaps that's the extent of it. There are pros and cons associated with both. What it all comes down to is love and enjoyment of the mode, the equipment, the techniques associated with AM. What's to defend?  And why?  Smiley

Who also likes that other Seattle music (from the early 90s) 

Never cared for the Grunge/stoner Seattle sound. Liked the Shoegaze/Britpop sound of the time a lot more. The Catherine Wheel, Blur, The Verve, etc. Rob Dickinson's vocals are more listenable to me than Kurt Kobain's, purely personal preference. Nirvana enjoy far more commercial success than the Catherine Wheel, though.


Logged

known as The Voice of Vermont in a previous life
K6JEK
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1189


RF in the shack


« Reply #22 on: December 05, 2007, 12:14:09 PM »

Three, three, three threads in one. I'll try to keep my comments brief. First you see that D104 in Joe, W1GFH's post? That's a ruse. I've never heard him using a D104. He probably had to borrow it. Second Bakersfield sound. Every time I drive through Bakersfield -- once or twice a year I make a point of playing some Buck Owens. It's the least I can do to show a little respect. There's an IN-N-OUT burger there too -- good place to stop. Third, flaming guitars. Like everyone else my age, I was in a rock band. We're not talking talent here, just enthusiasm. Well the rhythm guitarist in the band went to a Who concert and caught the Tune-o-matic bridge that flew off Pete Townshend's guitar. He gave it to me. It was a prized possession. It had provenance. But I lent it a friend of mine to try on his Gibson SG and he sold the guitar with the bridge on it. I'm still mad at him thirty years later.  Finally, East Coast Sound. I think Steve's right. The East Coast guys led the way towards better audio so maybe we should just use the term to mean good audio. Wait, that's four, isn't it?
Logged
W1GFH
Guest
« Reply #23 on: December 05, 2007, 12:52:58 PM »

Jon, you got hold of Pete Townsends guitar bridge - then LENT IT OUT? What a dam fool kid thing to do. What's next? Are you going to give away your Woodstock ticket stubs? Throw out the Viking Ranger that Bob Heil pronounced The Best Sounding In America (or something equally lofty)? Speaking of Bakersfield Sound, don't forget the "Boston Sound" (or "Bosstown  Sound") with bands like Ultimate Spinach, J Geils, Orpheus, Beacon Street Union, etc. that never quite got off the ground in 1968.
Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #24 on: December 05, 2007, 08:55:41 PM »

Quote
East Coast AM (especially in the AM window around New England) can often sound like a raucous CB channel, lots of sex, drugs, and rock and roll; fast break-in, hooting, burping, and spurious comments inserted by 3rd parties during transmissions using the "zero beat the other fellows carrier" method. And "personalities" galore! (It goes without saying that the AM stylings of WA1HLR had a lot to do with this evolution). East Coast AM is sometimes rude and crude but always fun.

I agree, in general, with Joe's observations. But, I would estimate the above statement applies to only about 10% of the east coast QSOs. Most are fairly straight up, courteous and friendly. More than a few are roundtables replete with old buzzard transmissions. When some of the east coast crew does let their hair down, it can be raucous. But the notice it gets seems out of proportion with the number of times it actually occurs.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.