The AM Forum
May 04, 2024, 12:18:29 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 5052 vs 6061 aluminum for chassis  (Read 7054 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
pwfallon
Guest
« on: November 02, 2006, 07:04:39 PM »

Hi All,

I am in the process of getting the aluminum stock required to build an enclosure / chassis for my 4x1 project. Both 5052 and 6061 aluminum is available in the thickness (.062") that I need. Is one of these preferred in terms of ease of forming, etc or does it not make a rat's butt difference in the context of what I am going to use it for.??..

PW Fallon
Logged
WA2AAE
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 17


« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2006, 07:14:21 PM »

If you go to the McMaster-Carr website, www.mcmaster.com, and go to catalog page 3416, it describes the characteristics of the different aluminum alloys. It shows that 5052 is better for forming and working.

73, Harv
Logged

Harvey
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8079


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2006, 08:06:50 PM »

I always found 5052 much better and easier for making chassis pieces, brackets, and material that needs forming.

For data:
5052:
http://www.metalsuppliersonline.com/research/property/metals/472.asp

6061:
http://www.suppliersonline.com/propertypages/6061.asp
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
K1JJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8886


"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz


« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2006, 08:36:01 PM »

 Grin
Logged

Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth  +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed.  Easily done in DSP.

Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."

There's nothing like an old dog.
W2JBL
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 676


« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2006, 09:13:04 PM »

Hi Joe! at Derecktor's and Minneford's we built ocean racer hulls with 6061T6. M16/M4 carbine lower receivers are 6061T6 too- it's tough stuff! 5052 is a much better choice if you are going to work the metal, bends won't crystalize etc. and welds better if you are a novice at Heliarc. your Greenlee chassis punches will deal with it better as well.
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2006, 08:26:42 AM »

T6 will crack if you bend it. You would have to use angle aluminum on th ecorners.
T6 is better suited for antenna elements. fc
Logged
k3zrf
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 603


WWW
« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2006, 07:04:53 PM »

I used a lot of 6061 for front panels...easily dichromated (anodized) for best appearance.

Softer grades were best suited for forming.
Logged

dave/zrf
A closed mouth gathers no foot
K1KFI
Guest
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2006, 10:59:30 PM »

Wow,


You can afford to buy aluminum? My sources are crusty old buzzards who have chosen to spend their golden years on rice boxes and the town metals dump..I went to Home Despot to get some lincane for my 1600 volt power supply the other day and it was 26 bucks for a 3x3 foot sheet.....No Way! But yes, softer is better for working. Oh, to have a metal shop with a hydraulic cutter and bending jigs and such!

I've been recycling since I pulled my first short wave receiver out of a trash pile one night while walking the dog as a 10 year old...I guess Cousin Brucie and WABC weren't cutting it on my 6 transistor radio. The warm audio on that first superhet did tho....

Regards,

Cliff

 Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.062 seconds with 18 queries.