wa1knx
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 451
|
|
« on: August 13, 2006, 08:26:42 PM » |
|
I remember reading about license renewal in here quite a while ago, has anyone don't it recently? I remember the thread was that it was a pain. However I ran into a ham who said its real quick now, fcc on the internet has gotten better.
Anyone done it like recently? Mines up this winter!
|
|
|
Logged
|
am forever!
|
|
|
KB2WIG
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4484
|
|
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2006, 09:11:18 PM » |
|
I did it last Aug.... no problem..... klc
|
|
|
Logged
|
What? Me worry?
|
|
|
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member
Offline
Posts: 10057
|
|
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2006, 12:29:10 AM » |
|
I did mine a few months ago, for June 2006 expiration. The FCC website has become much more user friendly. It took me two tries to get the FCC ID number which is the most difficult step; the actual renewal procedure took me only a few minutes, and the licence came in the mail a few days later.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Don, K4KYV AMI#5 Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM... Never got off AM in the first place.- - - This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout. http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
|
|
|
John Holotko
Member
Offline
Posts: 2132
|
|
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2006, 02:54:21 AM » |
|
I remember reading about license renewal in here quite a while ago, has anyone don't it recently? I remember the thread was that it was a pain. However I ran into a ham who said its real quick now, fcc on the internet has gotten better.
Anyone done it like recently? Mines up this winter!
I did it back when the FCC was just setting up their license renewal system on line and it went smooth and I had the new license in a matter of a week or two. If anything it's gotten even easier these days. No longer any need to use third party renewal services. Just go to the FCC site, apply for a FRN number in advance and when renewal time comes just use the ULS system and you're done.
|
|
|
Logged
|
N2IZE<br /><br />Because infinity comes in different sizes.
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2006, 02:48:50 PM » |
|
Dean, Very easy but I think you can't renew too early. It won't let you into the system until you fall into the renewal window. fc
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
k3zrf
Member
Offline
Posts: 604
|
|
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2006, 04:06:52 PM » |
|
Dean, Don't sweat it....just run WFSW.....radio free south west!
|
|
|
Logged
|
dave/zrf A closed mouth gathers no foot
|
|
|
W1RKW
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4413
|
|
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2006, 04:15:48 PM » |
|
Dean, Very easy but I think you can't renew too early. It won't let you into the system until you fall into the renewal window. fc
Dean, Frank is right. I tried to renew early one time and ULS system responded back saying I was too early and had to renew within 30 (or possibly 60 days) of expiration. B
|
|
|
Logged
|
Bob W1RKW Home of GORT.
|
|
|
W1UK
Member
Offline
Posts: 32
|
|
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2006, 04:28:01 PM » |
|
The renewal window is 90 days. If you try before then it will not accept it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KB2WIG
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4484
|
|
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2006, 09:37:41 PM » |
|
thars a few web sites that will do it for a few bucks........ klc
|
|
|
Logged
|
What? Me worry?
|
|
|
The Slab Bacon
Member
Offline
Posts: 3934
|
|
« Reply #10 on: August 15, 2006, 09:22:13 AM » |
|
thars a few web sites that will do it for a few bucks........ klc
In the true spirit of ham cheapdom, why pay someone else to do something that is free. I renewed on line a few years ago and it was quick and easy. The only problem was the oddbal piece of software that you had to download to navigate the FCC's website. It was kinda wierd, with my slow dialup it took about an hour to download the software, and it dosent tell you what it is doing when it was downloading, so you think your compooter is locked up! Once I finally got the software downloaded the rest of the renewal process took about 5 minutes, and it was free!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"No is not an answer and failure is not an option!"
|
|
|
KB2WIG
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4484
|
|
« Reply #11 on: August 15, 2006, 10:06:28 AM » |
|
thars a few web sites that will do it for a few bucks........ klc
In the true spirit of ham cheapdom, why pay someone else to do something that is free. Can you say " dipole in a bag " ? The FCC site is painless, and dont need no down loadin.... klc
|
|
|
Logged
|
What? Me worry?
|
|
|
The Slab Bacon
Member
Offline
Posts: 3934
|
|
« Reply #12 on: August 15, 2006, 10:25:49 AM » |
|
Well, they must have changed it fairly recently. You used to have to download some kind of a viewer to navigate their site. ( I know because I had to do it) If you dont have to anymore that only makes it easier and better. "whats not to like"
|
|
|
Logged
|
"No is not an answer and failure is not an option!"
|
|
|
wa1knx
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 451
|
|
« Reply #13 on: August 15, 2006, 03:41:41 PM » |
|
hey tx all, I'm due in december, so I'll have to wait a bit more, 90days is the soonist I guess. I'd like to get it done and out of the way before the dreaded xmas holiday. oh is it still fee free?
Deano
|
|
|
Logged
|
am forever!
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #14 on: August 15, 2006, 04:21:56 PM » |
|
Yup still free for us guys with real calls. Holiwood calls you have to pay.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
W1JS
Member
Offline
Posts: 225
|
|
« Reply #15 on: August 15, 2006, 04:31:27 PM » |
|
oh is it still fee free? Frank answered it well... Yup still free for us guys with real calls. Holiwood calls you have to pay. Just a reminder that us guys who got in on the bandwagon in '96 for a "vanity call" when they opened up are all coming up for renewal in November. Vanity call renewals are $21.90. It costs to be vain...
|
|
|
Logged
|
73 de W1JS Jack No. Weare NH
|
|
|
w1guh
Guest
|
|
« Reply #16 on: August 16, 2006, 09:44:21 AM » |
|
And don't forget the new question on form 605. You can get it at: http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form605/605main.pdf"4) The applicant/licensee certifies that neither the applicant/licensee nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. § 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. This certification does not apply to applications filed in services exempted under Section 1.2002(c) of the rules, 47 CFR § 1.2002(c). See Section 1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR § 1.2002(b), for the definition of “party to the application” as used in this certification."
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #17 on: August 16, 2006, 12:07:40 PM » |
|
Wow, next we will have to pea in a cup to renew. I can see it now Riley holding court as a steady stream of hams file into the bathroom with blue water to give a sample.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
w1guh
Guest
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 16, 2006, 12:22:14 PM » |
|
I looked up the law in question and it's not applicable to the Amateur Service. It's about receiving governmental awards for establishing commercial applications, or something like that. And since we're now sharing the application with other services...welll.....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
John Holotko
Member
Offline
Posts: 2132
|
|
« Reply #19 on: August 16, 2006, 01:22:59 PM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
N2IZE<br /><br />Because infinity comes in different sizes.
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 16, 2006, 08:52:53 PM » |
|
Frank, They did change the fcc site a while back. I remember it was a pain the first time I tested the waters asking for a copy of my license. When it was time to renew it had been changed and a lot easier.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|