Supreme Court Rules Against US Heritage

[W1UJR]

First the property ruling and now this. http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.commandments.ap/index.html

Slowly, every slowly, our rights and heritage are being taken from us.
First our property rights and then civil liberties, next our sovereignty.

What's next, voting to join the European Union?
One World Government?
I pledge Allegiance to Koffi Annan?
We already have "Thought Crimes" aka "Hate Crimes", how much further need we go?



"A split Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, ruling that two exhibits in Kentucky cross the line between separation of church and state because they promote a religious message.

The decision was the first of two seeking to mediate the bitter culture war over religion's place in public life. In it, the court declined to prohibit all displays in court buildings or on government property.

Justices left legal wiggle room, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history."

[/url]

[WA1GFZ]

So the question is will we run out of money or rights first.

since the people of iraq are so important to the clown.

[GEORGE/W2AMR]

First the property ruling and now this. http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.commandments.ap/index.html

Slowly, every slowly, our rights and heritage are being taken from us.
First our property rights and then civil liberties, next our sovereignty.

What's next, voting to join the European Union?
One World Government?
I pledge Allegiance to Koffi Annan?
We already have "Thought Crimes" aka "Hate Crimes", how much further need we go?



"A split Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, ruling that two exhibits in Kentucky cross the line between separation of church and state because they promote a religious message.

The decision was the first of two seeking to mediate the bitter culture war over religion's place in public life. In it, the court declined to prohibit all displays in court buildings or on government property.

Justices left legal wiggle room, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history."

[/url]

Could someone explain something to me? After the Inquirer was eliminate , whenever I posted something like this in the QSO section it was deleted. Has there been a change of policy? Or perhaps a case selective censorship?

[WA1GFZ]

George it is because you don't vote right.

You should be able to tell how you didn't vote right by the performance
of the guy you should have voted for. (just kidding!)

[GEORGE/W2AMR]

George it is because you don't vote right.

)

You're right. I only vote left.

[WA1GFZ]

I'm not right this time...I've made that mistake a couple times though.
I usually pick the one who stinks the least.

[nq5t]

"A split Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, ruling that two exhibits in Kentucky cross the line between separation of church and state because they promote a religious message.... "

And rightly so -- the "promote a religious message" part is the operative part.  Nothing wrong with the commandments as heritage, everything wrong with the other.  That message can be promoted in all sorts of places.  But the government has no business doing it -- Right, Left, doesn't matter.

Too much of that promotion currently going on in THIS government as it is ...

I did have to smile today when I read that the new Attorney General can make a proper distinction between "breast" and "porn" and has finally removed those stupid "drapes" from the statues ..  :lol:

Grant/NQ5T

[WA1GFZ]

Good thing our A.G. can tell the difference. I wouldn't want to see women walking around under tents. That would be no fun on the beach.

[Ott]

First the property ruling and now this. http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.commandments.ap/index.html

Slowly, every slowly, our rights and heritage are being taken from us.
First our property rights and then civil liberties, next our sovereignty.

What's next, voting to join the European Union?
One World Government?
I pledge Allegiance to Koffi Annan?
We already have "Thought Crimes" aka "Hate Crimes", how much further need we go?



"A split Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, ruling that two exhibits in Kentucky cross the line between separation of church and state because they promote a religious message.

The decision was the first of two seeking to mediate the bitter culture war over religion's place in public life. In it, the court declined to prohibit all displays in court buildings or on government property.

Justices left legal wiggle room, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history."

"Polluting Plants Get Court Backing"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/24/tech/main704059.shtml

Yo Bruce... why are you surprised... your getting exactly what you asked for in 2000 and again in 2004... enjoy!

[Jack-KA3ZLR-]

What's Next,

 We better start bushing up on our Asian Dialect, there is a great influx of Asian Investment  in this country. It's Scary.

[GEORGE/W2AMR]

First the property ruling and now this. http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.commandments.ap/index.html

Slowly, every slowly, our rights and heritage are being taken from us.
First our property rights and then civil liberties, next our sovereignty.

What's next, voting to join the European Union?
One World Government?
I pledge Allegiance to Koffi Annan?
We already have "Thought Crimes" aka "Hate Crimes", how much further need we go?



"A split Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, ruling that two exhibits in Kentucky cross the line between separation of church and state because they promote a religious message.

The decision was the first of two seeking to mediate the bitter culture war over religion's place in public life. In it, the court declined to prohibit all displays in court buildings or on government property.

Justices left legal wiggle room, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history."

"Polluting Plants Get Court Backing"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/24/tech/main704059.shtml

Yo Bruce... why are you surprised... your getting exactly what you asked for in 2000 and again in 2004... enjoy!

Must be the fault of them damn liberal Judges again Ott.

Four of the last six elections resulted in Republican presidents, and seven of the Supreme Court's nine current members were appointed by Republican presidents

[Jack-KA3ZLR-]

First the property ruling and now this. http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.commandments.ap/index.html

Slowly, every slowly, our rights and heritage are being taken from us.
First our property rights and then civil liberties, next our sovereignty.

What's next, voting to join the European Union?
One World Government?
I pledge Allegiance to Koffi Annan?
We already have "Thought Crimes" aka "Hate Crimes", how much further need we go?



"A split Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, ruling that two exhibits in Kentucky cross the line between separation of church and state because they promote a religious message.

The decision was the first of two seeking to mediate the bitter culture war over religion's place in public life. In it, the court declined to prohibit all displays in court buildings or on government property.

Justices left legal wiggle room, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history."

[/url]

But where's the part that guarantees my Power Of Choice, Hmm, me thinks they think I don't need that.

[WA1GFZ]

The belt way boob will set us straight tonight.

[Ott]

First the property ruling and now this. http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.commandments.ap/index.html

Slowly, every slowly, our rights and heritage are being taken from us.
First our property rights and then civil liberties, next our sovereignty.

What's next, voting to join the European Union?
One World Government?
I pledge Allegiance to Koffi Annan?
We already have "Thought Crimes" aka "Hate Crimes", how much further need we go?



"A split Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, ruling that two exhibits in Kentucky cross the line between separation of church and state because they promote a religious message.

The decision was the first of two seeking to mediate the bitter culture war over religion's place in public life. In it, the court declined to prohibit all displays in court buildings or on government property.

Justices left legal wiggle room, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history."

"Polluting Plants Get Court Backing"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/24/tech/main704059.shtml

Yo Bruce... why are you surprised... your getting exactly what you asked for in 2000 and again in 2004... enjoy!

Must be the fault of them damn liberal Judges again Ott.

Four of the last six elections resulted in Republican presidents, and seven of the Supreme Court's nine current members were appointed by Republican presidents

Nah George... the problem is one of an obscured deity... the Jesuslanders believed they were getting the god of Lincoln along with the party of Lincoln but... since they didn't bother to get it in writing, they got the god of business instead and are now railing at the Faustian choice they made... appréciez....

[GEORGE/W2AMR]

First the property ruling and now this. http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.commandments.ap/index.html

Slowly, every slowly, our rights and heritage are being taken from us.
First our property rights and then civil liberties, next our sovereignty.

What's next, voting to join the European Union?
One World Government?
I pledge Allegiance to Koffi Annan?
We already have "Thought Crimes" aka "Hate Crimes", how much further need we go?



"A split Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, ruling that two exhibits in Kentucky cross the line between separation of church and state because they promote a religious message.

The decision was the first of two seeking to mediate the bitter culture war over religion's place in public life. In it, the court declined to prohibit all displays in court buildings or on government property.

Justices left legal wiggle room, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history."

"Polluting Plants Get Court Backing"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/24/tech/main704059.shtml

Yo Bruce... why are you surprised... your getting exactly what you asked for in 2000 and again in 2004... enjoy!

Must be the fault of them damn liberal Judges again Ott.

Four of the last six elections resulted in Republican presidents, and seven of the Supreme Court's nine current members were appointed by Republican presidents

Nah George... the problem is one of an obscured deity... the Jesuslanders believed they were getting the god of Lincoln along with the party of Lincoln but... since they didn't bother to get it in writing, they got the god of business instead and are now railing at the Faustian choice they made... appréciez....

Can I git an Amen brother Ott?

[Ott]

First the property ruling and now this. http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/27/scotus.commandments.ap/index.html

Slowly, every slowly, our rights and heritage are being taken from us.
First our property rights and then civil liberties, next our sovereignty.

What's next, voting to join the European Union?
One World Government?
I pledge Allegiance to Koffi Annan?
We already have "Thought Crimes" aka "Hate Crimes", how much further need we go?



"A split Supreme Court struck down Ten Commandments displays in courthouses Monday, ruling that two exhibits in Kentucky cross the line between separation of church and state because they promote a religious message.

The decision was the first of two seeking to mediate the bitter culture war over religion's place in public life. In it, the court declined to prohibit all displays in court buildings or on government property.

Justices left legal wiggle room, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history."

"Polluting Plants Get Court Backing"

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/24/tech/main704059.shtml

Yo Bruce... why are you surprised... your getting exactly what you asked for in 2000 and again in 2004... enjoy!

Must be the fault of them damn liberal Judges again Ott.

Four of the last six elections resulted in Republican presidents, and seven of the Supreme Court's nine current members were appointed by Republican presidents

Nah George... the problem is one of an obscured deity... the Jesuslanders believed they were getting the god of Lincoln along with the party of Lincoln but... since they didn't bother to get it in writing, they got the god of business instead and are now railing at the Faustian choice they made... appréciez....

Can I git an Amen brother Ott?

It gets better George... read in some far right publication that any conservative who expires during the Boosh presidency is going to Ferengi Hell... see there is a God...