The AM Forum
May 08, 2024, 10:45:10 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: FCC Issues $21,000 NAL to K1MAN  (Read 60282 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WB3JOK
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 635



« Reply #25 on: June 14, 2005, 07:40:44 PM »

Quote from: WV Hoopie
Wanta bet a soda Glen drags it out in court? Could be a while before the Fat Lady sings the last note.

No bet, I am sure he will contest it. Just to be a pain in the butt. And fanatics with causes never admit they're wrong about anything, regardless of how overwhelming the evidence. It'd be devastating to his self-esteem...

Another couple of bets for you to place - do you think his license will be renewed in October?  And will he then stop broadcasting and QRMing or will it continue until they haul him off in cuffs? :evil:
Logged
WV Hoopie
Guest
« Reply #26 on: June 14, 2005, 10:44:11 PM »

Quote from: WB3JOK
Quote from: WV Hoopie
Wanta bet a soda Glen drags it out in court? Could be a while before the Fat Lady sings the last note.

No bet, I am sure he will contest it. Just to be a pain in the butt. And fanatics with causes never admit they're wrong about anything, regardless of how overwhelming the evidence. It'd be devastating to his self-esteem...

Another couple of bets for you to place - do you think his license will be renewed in October?  And will he then stop broadcasting and QRMing or will it continue until they haul him off in cuffs? :evil:


Well, hope the license doesn't get renewed and his imitation of W1AW comes to an end. So many violators, so little time.

Bacon has the correct question, why the selective enforcement? The resources have been in place for years. Doesn't take long to zero in on a transmission if the desire or order is given. Shouldn't take years to build a case.
Logged
KA1ZGC
Guest
« Reply #27 on: June 14, 2005, 10:56:49 PM »

Quote from: w3bv

In the future, rather than jump to conclusions about Commission actions (or inaction), you might want to contact them first, toll-free, at  1-888-225-5322. They will be happy to answer your questions or direct you to those who can.


I'll ask again:

Did you call them?
Logged
Ott
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 176



« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2005, 01:03:43 AM »

Well its now on the ARRL web site so it must be "true"...



http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/06/14/100/?nc=1
Logged
Jack-KA3ZLR-
Guest
« Reply #29 on: June 15, 2005, 06:41:43 AM »

Ya Know I had my days where i'd bitch about this and turn the rigs off in disgust.

Anymore it's like watching the Piety throttle Brutus.


Better things to do, plenty of time to do them. Cheesy
Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #30 on: June 15, 2005, 06:46:24 AM »

Here you go....


Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of

Glenn A. Baxter
RR 1  Box 776
Belgrade Lakes, ME 04918

Licensee of Amateur Radio Station K1MAN
   
File No. EB-04-BS-111
NAL/Acct. No. 200532260001
FRN 0013164975

NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE

      Released:  June 7, 2005

By the District Director, Boston Office, Northeastern Region, Enforcement Bureau:

I.   INTRODUCTION

1.   In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture (“NAL”), pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), we find Glenn A. Baxter, licensee of Amateur Radio Station K1MAN, apparently liable for a monetary forfeiture in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000).  We conclude that Mr. Baxter apparently willfully and repeatedly interfered with ongoing communications of other stations in violation of Section 97.101(d) of the Commission’s Rules (the “Rules”) .  We further conclude that Mr. Baxter apparently willfully and repeatedly transmitted communications in which he had a pecuniary interest in violation of Section 97.113(a)(3) of the Rules. We find that Mr. Baxter apparently willfully and repeatedly failed to file requested information pursuant to an Enforcement Bureau (“Bureau”) directive.  We further find that Mr. Baxter apparently willfully engaged in broadcasting in violation of 97.113(b) of the Rules  and apparently willfully failed to exercise control of his station in violation of Section 97.105(a) of the Rules.  


II.   BACKGROUND

2.   Mr. Baxter has a license to operate an amateur radio station, call sign K1MAN.  Mr. Baxter also is executive director of the American Amateur Radio Association (“AARA”), which has a website at www.K1MAN.com.  Mr. Baxter uses his amateur station to advertise his website, which offers items for sale, including an annual newsletter published by “Glenn Baxter, K1MAN” for forty-five (45) dollars per year.  The website also provides a schedule of K1MAN radio transmissions.

3.   In response to numerous complaints of deliberate interference caused by transmissions from Mr. Baxter’s Amateur station K1MAN to ongoing radio communications of other stations, including stations participating in the Salvation Army Team Emergency Radio Net, the Bureau issued a Warning Notice to Mr. Baxter on September 15, 2004.  The Bureau requested information from Mr. Baxter with regard to the method of station control and what action, if any, was being taken in response to the complaints of interference.   The Warning Notice also reminded Mr. Baxter that the Bureau previously warned him in a letter dated April 14, 2004 that enforcement action would be taken if he failed to correct the deliberate interference being caused by his station.   The April 14, 2004 letter also cautioned Mr. Baxter that if he continued to use the station for pecuniary interest by advertising his website he could be subject to further enforcement action.  

4.   By letter dated October 14, 2004, Mr. Baxter responded to the September 15, 2004 Warning Notice stating “[n]o corrective actions are necessary at K1MAN” and “[n]o changes are needed with regard to station control which is in full compliance with all FCC rules.”  Mr. Baxter’s letter further stated that “K1MAN is in full compliance with all FCC rules, state laws, and federal laws.  I encourage you to take ‘enforcement actions’ and look forward to seeing you in court (s).”   Mr. Baxter’s response did not provide the required information requested regarding station control.

5.   The Bureau issued a second Warning Notice to Mr. Baxter on October 29, 2004.  The Warning Notice explained that Mr. Baxter’s response to the September 15, 2004, Warning Notice was insufficient and explained Mr. Baxter’s obligations as a licensee to furnish the information requested by the Bureau.  The Bureau provided Mr. Baxter an additional twenty days to provide the specific information requested.  The Warning Notice also indicated that the Bureau had received two additional complaints of deliberate interference caused by Mr. Baxter’s station.  The Bureau requested information from Mr. Baxter regarding the identity of the control operator and method of station control for station K1MAN on the dates and times specified in the recently-received interference complaints.  

6.   Mr. Baxter responded by letter dated November 2, 2004, stating that “[m]y letter to you dated 14 October 2004 in response to your letter to me dated 15 September 2004 provided all the information required by FCC rules and by federal law.”   Mr. Baxter did not provide any information regarding the identity of the control operator or the method of station control.

7.   On November 25, 2004, Commission personnel monitored Mr. Baxter’s Amateur station on 14.275 MHz between 9:21 a.m. and 2:12 p.m. EST.  During that time, Mr. Baxter’s station transmitted numerous on-the-air references to his web page at www.K1MAN.com.  On November 27, 2004, Mr. Baxter’s Amateur station K1MAN began transmitting on top of ongoing communications at 5:54 p.m. EST on 3.890 MHz, disrupting the communications by the other licensees.

8.   On November 30, 2004, agents from the FCC’s Boston Office conducted an inspection of Mr. Baxter’s Amateur station K1MAN.  The method of station control appeared to be a telephone line connected to an interface board, which was connected to the transmitter.  Mr. Baxter claimed that he monitored the station from a mobile receiver when not at the transmitter and that he could control the transmitter through a land-line or cellular phone.  During the inspection, Mr. Baxter demonstrated that he could control the transmitter.

9.   On December 1, 2004, on the frequencies 3.975 MHz and 14.275 MHz, Mr. Baxter’s station K1MAN transmitted a pre-recorded program lasting nearly seventy minutes, which consisted of an interview by Mr. Baxter with Mr. Jeff Owens.  During the broadcast, Mr. Baxter explained that Baxter Associates was a firm that engaged in “management consulting, executive search and executive career management.”  The program consisted of a lengthy broadcast of the telephone interview with Mr. Owens.  Mr. Baxter explained the fees involved, how Mr. Owens could invest in franchises of Baxter Associates, and how Mr. Baxter planned to market the franchises of Baxter Associates.  Nothing in the program related to Amateur radio and no station call sign was given until the conclusion of the seventy-minute program.

10.   On December 8, 2004, FCC agents found that Baxter’s station K1MAN commenced transmitting at 7:10 p.m. EST on top of existing radio communications on 3.890 MHz.  On December 19, 2004, from 5:44 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. EST, on frequency 3.975 MHz, Mr. Baxter’s Amateur station K1MAN broadcast  transmissions of an apparently defective pre-recorded audio tape, which resulted in the repeated transmission of a nine-word phrase, and segments thereof, without any intervention of a control operator and without the identification of the station’s call sign.  Mr. Baxter’s Amateur station went off the air abruptly at 6:30 p.m. EST in mid-sentence.

11.   On March 30, 2005, monitoring personnel observed station K1MAN advertising the www.K1MAN.com web site at approximately 7:19, 7:28, 7:33 and 8:05 P.M. EST on 3.890 MHz.  On March 31, 2005, at 7:28 P.M. EST, monitoring personnel observed transmissions from station K1MAN begin on top of existing communications on 3.890 MHz.


III.   DISCUSSION

12.   Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the Commission there under, shall be liable for a forfeiture penalty.  The term "willful" as used in Section 503(b) of the Act has been interpreted to mean simply that the acts or omissions are committed knowingly.   The term “repeated” means the commission or omission of such act more than once or for more than one day.  

13.   Section 97.101(d) of the Rules states that “[n]o amateur operator shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communication or signal.”   On November 27, 2004, December 8, 2004, and March 31, 2005, Baxter’s Amateur station K1MAN commenced transmitting on top of existing communications on 3.890 MHz in apparent willful and repeated violation of 97.101(d) of the Commission’s rules.

14.   Section 97.113(a)(3) of the Rules prohibits an Amateur station from transmitting any communications in which the station licensee or control operator has a pecuniary interest.  On November 25, 2004 and March 30, 2005, Mr. Baxter’s station repeatedly transmitted references to his website, which offers various products for sale, including a monthly newsletter published by Glenn Baxter and offered for sale for forty-five dollars per year.  In addition, on December 1, 2004, Station K1MAN transmitted a seventy-minute interview with a person who was considering whether to retain Baxter Associates, an employment-search firm owned by Mr. Baxter.  During the transmission, Mr. Baxter discussed fees, investments, and franchising opportunities.  We find that Mr. Baxter apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 97.113(a)(3) of the Rules on each of these occasions by transmitting communications regarding matters in which he has a pecuniary interest.

15.   Section 308(b) of the Act provides that the Commission “during the term of any (such) licenses, may require from …a licensee further written statements of fact to enable it to determine whether such original application should be granted or denied or such license revoked . . . .”   Although Mr. Baxter replied in part to the Bureau’s demand for information in the Warning Notices dated September 15, 2004 and October 29, 2004, Mr. Baxter failed to provide information regarding how the station is controlled and the identity of the control operator.  Mr. Baxter’s statements that “[n]o corrective actions are necessary” and “[n]o changes are needed with regard to station control” are insufficient.  We therefore conclude that Glenn A. Baxter apparently willfully and repeatedly failed to comply with a Bureau directive to file information regarding control of Station K1MAN.  

16.   Section 97.113(b) of the Rules prohibits, with limited exceptions not applicable here, an Amateur station from engaging in any form of broadcasting or transmitting one-way transmissions. Section 97.3(a)(10) of the Rules defines broadcasting as “transmissions intended for reception by the general public.”    We find that the pre-recorded seventy-minute interview with a person interested in retaining Baxter Associates, during which there was no station identification, constitutes a “broadcast” and an impermissible one-way transmission.  Therefore, Mr. Baxter apparently willfully violated Section 97.113(b) of the Rules.

17.   Section 97.105(a) of the Rules provides that the control operator must ensure the proper operation of the station.   On December 19, 2004, station K1MAN repeated the same pre-recorded phrase, and segments thereof, for 45 minutes on 3.975 MHz after which the transmissions ended abruptly in mid-sentence without the station identification required by Section 97.119(a) of the Rules.   The continuous transmissions of the same pre-recorded phrase and segments thereof, and the abrupt ending of those transmissions in mid-sentence without identification, suggests that Mr. Baxter did not exercise control of his station.  We conclude that Mr. Baxter apparently willfully violated Section 97.105(a) of the Rules.

18.   Pursuant to The Commission’s Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), and Section 1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount is $7,000 for willful or malicious interference, $3,000 for failure to file required information, and $3,000 for violation of transmitter control.    There are no base forfeiture amounts for violations of the rules prohibiting broadcasting or pecuniary interest in Part 97 of the Commission’s rules.  We conclude, however, that violations of the Part 97 rules prohibiting broadcasting and the transmission of any communication in which the operator has a pecuniary interest are similar to violations of the Commission’s requirements pertaining to broadcasting of lotteries and contests, which carry a base forfeiture amount of $4,000 for each such violation.   In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must also take into account the statutory factors set forth in Section 503(b)(2)(D) of the Act, which include the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violations, and with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, and history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require.   Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80, and the statutory factors, a $21,000 forfeiture is warranted.


IV.   ORDERING CLAUSES

19.   Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,  and Section 1.80 of the Commission’s Rules,  Glenn A. Baxter, is hereby NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE in the amount of twenty-one thousand dollars ($21,000) for willfully and repeatedly failing to furnish information requested by the Bureau, willful and repeated violation of Section 97.101(d) of the Rules, willful violation of Section 97.105(a) of the Rules, willful and repeated violation of Section 97.113(a)(3) of the Rules, and willful violation of Section 97.113(b) of the Rules.

20.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission’s Rules, within thirty (30) days of the release of this NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY, Mr. Baxter SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.

21.   Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission.  The payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above.  Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-8340.  Payment by overnight mail may be sent to Mellon Bank /LB 358340, 500 Ross Street, Room 1540670, Pittsburgh, PA 15251.   Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 043000261, receiving bank Mellon Bank, and account number 911-6106.

22.   The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Northeast Region, Boston Office, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7448 within thirty (30) days from the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption.  

23.   The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting practices ("GAAP"); or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner’s current financial status.  Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted.  

24.   Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.

25.   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this NAL shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Glenn A. Baxter, at his address of record.

   FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION



Dennis V. Loria
District Director
Boston Office
Northeastern Region
Enforcement Bureau
Logged
w3bv
Guest
« Reply #31 on: June 15, 2005, 07:52:04 AM »

Actually, I used email.
Logged
Fred k2dx
Guest
« Reply #32 on: June 15, 2005, 08:13:45 AM »

Quote from: WV Hoopie
Quote from: WB3JOK
Quote from: WV Hoopie
Wanta bet a soda Glen drags it out in court? Could be a while before the Fat Lady sings the last note.

No bet, I am sure he will contest it. Just to be a pain in the butt. And fanatics with causes never admit they're wrong about anything, regardless of how overwhelming the evidence. It'd be devastating to his self-esteem...

Another couple of bets for you to place - do you think his license will be renewed in October?  And will he then stop broadcasting and QRMing or will it continue until they haul him off in cuffs? :evil:


Well, hope the license doesn't get renewed and his imitation of W1AW comes to an end. So many violators, so little time.

Bacon has the correct question, why the selective enforcement? The resources have been in place for years. Doesn't take long to zero in on a transmission if the desire or order is given. Shouldn't take years to build a case.


Who gives a rat's behind if it's selective or not....it addresses the problem(finally) with some heavyweight, attention getting ammunition.

As far as shouldn't take so long, did you do anything to help the FCC ?

It's ironic now that Riley has at long last acted there are those who still complain. Sounds to me like a bumper sticker I once saw: 'Born to Bitch'.

Let's just hope this prevents a certain license in Maine from being renewed this fall.......maybe send Riley a note showing appreciation and support? It would be more useful than complaining.
Logged
Art
Guest
« Reply #33 on: June 15, 2005, 08:25:05 AM »

:oops:

Fred is right. Let's do that. Our discussions on the board here are often designed to troll a little or get in someones shorts. I can't tell you how much fun it is to rag on George, Pete, Bruce, and even Thom on ocasion  Cool . However, this is a good thing. Drop Riley a happy gram. We (even Bacon) do support him and this is a good thing.

All the best,
Art
Logged
KA1ZGC
Guest
« Reply #34 on: June 15, 2005, 10:40:27 AM »

Quote from: w3bv
Actually, I used email.


Then you did the right thing, but you could have simply said that two days ago and saved both of us a lot of typing.

When I asked "are you sure", I got no response from anyone. An entire day went by before the story was confirmed, during which the thread went silent.

That certainly didn't give me the impression that anyone had confirmed it.

I didn't post the information, it's not my responsibility to confirm it. Pointing out that there was no corroborating evidence at that point was not a personal attack on you, though you seem to think it was. You could have simply responded "yes, I confirmed this with Riley" rather than declaring war on me.

I never said the NAL was a hoax, I said that without confirmation, and considering the source (that means Glenn, not you), it might have been. Go back and read the post again if you don't beleive me.

My "Newsweek" reference was a point of what happens when people act on uncorroborated information (riots, suicide, little things like thiat). That's hardly a "personal bias". Again, you could have simply replied "yes, I confirmed this with Riley", but you went into hyper-defensive war mode, adding to the impression that you didn't.

The concept of "let's not leap to conclusions" is not leaping to a conclusion.

I'm sorry if you feel you've been attacked, because you haven't, but don't let that stop you from attacking me some more.

--Thom
Killer Agony One Zipper Got Caught
Logged
w3bv
Guest
« Reply #35 on: June 15, 2005, 11:51:57 AM »

No harm, no foul. I didn't feel attacked.

I was simply pointing out that you were rushing to judgment. Inasmuch as I was not following the thread in the day or so after your initial post, I was not available to respond to the erroneous conclusion apparently deduced from your brief research.
Logged
KA1ZGC
Guest
« Reply #36 on: June 15, 2005, 12:25:07 PM »

Quote from: w3bv
No harm, no foul. I didn't feel attacked; I simply wanted to point out that you were rushing to judgement.


Well, I should have left it with the first post and not gone off on the Newsweek old-buzzard. That clearly didn't come across the way it was intended. I'm good like that. Sorry for any misunderstanding.

Now we can focus on the next chapter in the K1MAN story.

--Thom
Kerolene Apparatus One Zooming Golf Cart
Logged
w3bv
Guest
« Reply #37 on: June 15, 2005, 12:27:49 PM »

Again, no harm done. I didn't take it personally and hope you didn't (don't) take it personally either.
Logged
KA1ZGC
Guest
« Reply #38 on: June 15, 2005, 12:36:32 PM »

Quote from: w3bv
Again, no harm done. I didn't take it personally and hope you didn't (don't) take it personally either.


In this crowd?  Cool
Logged
w3bv
Guest
« Reply #39 on: June 15, 2005, 01:28:24 PM »

Can only speak for myself...
Logged
Sam KS2AM
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 708



WWW
« Reply #40 on: June 15, 2005, 02:04:17 PM »

http://www.no2k1man.com/

... this website is apparently a work in progress.


Sam  /  KS2AM
Logged

--- Post No Bills ---
KA1ZGC
Guest
« Reply #41 on: June 15, 2005, 02:31:05 PM »

Quote from: Sam KS2AM
http://www.no2k1man.com/

... this website is apparently a work in progress.


Sam  /  KS2AM


Hey, cool! Check out the audio section!

And, hey, what miscreant's head is that the back of in the right-hand side of the photo? Look familiar?

--Thom
Killer Appetizer One Zesty Green Cannabis
Logged
Glenn K2KL
Guest
« Reply #42 on: June 15, 2005, 04:05:57 PM »

The "get off my frequency.." audio clip is most interesting! What a Dick head!!  :evil:  :evil:


Quote from: KA1ZGC
Quote from: Sam KS2AM
http://www.no2k1man.com/

... this website is apparently a work in progress.


Sam  /  KS2AM


Hey, cool! Check out the audio section!

And, hey, what miscreant's head is that the back of in the right-hand side of the photo? Look familiar?

--Thom
Killer Appetizer One Zesty Green Cannabis
Logged
W1RKW
Contributing
Member
*
Online Online

Posts: 4405



« Reply #43 on: June 15, 2005, 04:57:14 PM »

Some additional info.

see EFFORT UNDERWAY TO DENY K1MAN’s LICENSE RENEWAL

http://www.w5yi.org/ama_news_article.php?id=50
Logged

Bob
W1RKW
Home of GORT.
Tim WA1HnyLR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 159


WWW
« Reply #44 on: June 15, 2005, 08:17:45 PM »

This is a call to all of those who wish to help me produce a series of 1/2 hour series of Real Amateur Shows for WBCQ. The Rise and Fall Of Glenn Baxter. I know that Glenn has pissed off many people . Trying to get objectivity will be difficult . I need YOUR inpoot. You can Email me . Timtron@ hotmail . com. If you can put together a thoughtfully produced audio production you can send it to Tim Smith,PO box 3123, Skowhegan,Maine 04976. Thanx much. TimWA1HnyLR
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #45 on: June 15, 2005, 09:23:07 PM »

Tim,
Why not invite baxter to do the show as a goof we all can enjoy.
phone patch from jail irb style.
Logged
kc2ifr
Guest
« Reply #46 on: June 16, 2005, 01:04:18 PM »

Check this out............
K1MAN EDITORIAL - ED050616 -

WHERE IS THE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY?

You read what the FCC says about K1MAN.   You read about what other
hams say about K1MAN.   Where do you read about what K1MAN says?
ARRL?   No!   QST?   No!   CQ?  No!   World Radio!   No!   K1TP?  No!
QRZ?   No!   What is wrong with this picture, you ignorant hypocrites?
No wonder the Arabs hate our guts so much.   No wonder Amateur Radio
is going down the tubes, led by ARRL.

I love both America and Amateur Radio, however.   K1MAN will be on for
many many years to come, and the true scum of our precious hobby and
service will be thoroughly exposed in the upcoming court proceedings.
K1MAN has been on the air with IARN information bulletins since 1987,
and the FCC is as powerless to stop them as K1MAN is powerless to
stamp out amateur radio ignorance.   Fear not fellow Radio Amateurs.
You have the constitutional right to be stupid!   Only in America!

Join the American Amateur Radio Association today!   See www.K1MAN.com

K1MAN SAYS:

FCC ISSUES A $21, 000 NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY AGAINST K1MAN

In a  "NAL" released 7 June 2005, the FCC has opened a pandora's box, according
to Glenn Baxter, Manager of IARN, the International Amateur Radio Network, and
AARA, the American Amateur Radio Association.   Mr. Baxter was recognized by
the State of Maine legislature on March 13, 1991 and named as a Vermont
Academy Distinguished Alumnus on October 1, 1993 for international amateur
radio communications work with his IARN.   Mr. Baxter says that this whole
charade is being driven by petty ham jealousy and the blatent incompetence of
ARRL in failing over the years to come even close to the work of IARN in emergency
communications work.    Baxter welcomes these court actions since he has been
trying to "face off" with the Commission for over 15 years.   "Many heads are finally
going to roll," acording to Baxter.   K1MAN's response is printed below together with the full text of the NAL.


In the matter of
Glenn A. Baxter, P.E.
Registered Professional Engineer

Licensee of Amateur Radio Station K1MAN

File. No. EB-04-BS-111
NAL/Acct. No. 200532260001
FRN 0013164975

Reply dated 12 June 2005

Respondent Glenn A. Baxter, K1MAN, denies any apparent liability for
forfeiture in the amount of $21,000 or any other violations of FCC
rules, state law, or federal law.

Respondent has received three identical "NALs" in years past, and his
vigorus attempts to appeal same to the full Commission have been
repeatedly  "deep sixed" and thus blocking respondent's rights to and
desired access to the Washington D.C. Court of Appeals in the pursuit
of due process of law as guaranteed by the United States Constitution.

The alleged daily intentional interference by K1MAN over the last
eighteen years to other amateur radio communications by K1MAN's
scheduled W1AW styled one way information bulletins is a criminal
violation of Sections 333 and 501 of the 1934 Communications Act.
The American Radio Relay League's intentional deletion of these
previously printed Sections from their "FCC Rule Book" is also a
criminal violation of the Act as well as John B. Johnston and William
Riley Hollingsworth's actions and inactions that have encouraged
and/or condoned intentional amateur radio interference to K1MAN
information bulletins over the years.  (1)

United States Constitution:

Article Five:

     "No person shall be held to answer for a capital or
      otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or
      indictment of a Grand Jury....nor be deprived of
      life, liberty, or property, withourt due process of
      law; nor shall private property be taken for public
      use without just compensation."

Article Six:

     "In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy
      the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial
      jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall
      have been committed..........; to be confronted by the
      witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for
      obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the
      assistance of counsel in his defense."

Respondent hereby requests the Commission to supply all documentation
regarding the alleged apparent liability and criminal violations
for respondent to use in preparation for the again demanded trial like
hearing before the full Commission and for the other court actions.

Respondent will be calling witnesses, introducing affivavits, and
further demonstrating many ACTUAL criminal violations of Sections 333
and 501 of the 1934 Communications Act by numerous persons complained
about by your respondent and others in Felony Complaint Affidavits
filed with the U.S. Attorney including the two FCC officials
mentioned above.






(signed)
Glenn A. Baxter, P.E., K1MAN
Registered Professional Engineer
Logged
Ed KB1HVS
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 962


« Reply #47 on: June 16, 2005, 03:00:18 PM »

I have a warm fuzzy feeling about this Cheesy
Logged

KB1HVS. Your Hi Value Station
Art
Guest
« Reply #48 on: June 16, 2005, 03:02:33 PM »

yep, did you ever notice that the less there is in a bottle the more noise it makes when what's in it comes out . . . .

what if, just what if, the FCC tells Glen Baxter to pound sand and he can't have no stinking court date . . . they can, they have, and I think they will.
then he can petition the government to sue the FCC in federal court. ...- .-

-ap
Logged
W1DAN
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 904



« Reply #49 on: June 16, 2005, 04:16:19 PM »

Hi All:

To quote part of his reply:

"and the true scum of our precious hobby and
service will be thoroughly exposed in the upcoming court proceedings."

I think they will.

My guess is they will just not renew his license and leave him hanging and complaning.

Being a president of a local radio club, I had to remove someone in a simelar manner last month..this guy was threatening lawsuits and saying we must have 100% town members and do emergency service using FRS.

I always wanted to have a spoof of K1MAN's broadcast as "W0MAN", and take his audio from off the air recordings (or create new audio) making fun of him.

If I lost my job, won the lottery and had time, I could put on a much more professional bulletin service without all the BS, and do it without pissing off people.

Tim, lemme know how I can help.

73,
Dan
W1DAN
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.071 seconds with 18 queries.