The AM Forum
April 25, 2024, 08:29:20 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Negative Feedback  (Read 6649 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
wy3d
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 9


« on: May 30, 2005, 04:04:24 PM »

I have a Knight T-150A transmitter and the design uses a 470K feedback resistor from the 6DE7 modulator tube back to the cathode of the second half of the 12AX7 mic amp.  I have nticed in most designs there is a capacitor in series with the resistor used for negative feedback.  What is the purpose of the capacitor other than to block the DC? The resistor alone seems to be working OK.
Frank  WY3D
Logged
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4619



« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2005, 07:19:21 PM »

To shape the audio response.  Example:  If you have a low value capacitance, say 500 pF in series with the FB resistor, the negative FB will be weighted towards the high frequency end due to the capacitive reactance.  Therefore, the gain of the amp at high frequencies will be less.
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
K2FW
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 69


WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2005, 08:44:25 PM »

Quote from: w3jn
To shape the audio response.  Example:  If you have a low value capacitance, say 500 pF in series with the FB resistor, the negative FB will be weighted towards the high frequency end due to the capacitive reactance.  Therefore, the gain of the amp at high frequencies will be less.

So, in other words, a smaller cap such as a 300pf in the feedback loop will in effect give the modulator a bit more low end response?
Logged
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4619



« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2005, 10:55:03 PM »

No.  It will cut the high freq response.  Remember the more NFB the lower the gain, and when you have MORE HF NFB you have less gain at HF.  THe lower freq gain isn't affected (although with a straight R/C circuit it's gonna fall off at a linear rate)

73 John
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
K2FW
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 69


WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2005, 05:35:11 PM »

Quote from: w3jn
No.  It will cut the high freq response.  Remember the more NFB the lower the gain, and when you have MORE HF NFB you have less gain at HF.  THe lower freq gain isn't affected (although with a straight R/C circuit it's gonna fall off at a linear rate)

73 John

Ok John, in afterthought I guess I should have worded my response a little better. I really meant to say, that in using a smaller cap in the feed-back loop,would in effect appear to give the modulator more low end by limiting the high end response. Thanks so much John for your input into this discussion.  It's very interesting to say the least!
Logged
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4619



« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2005, 07:17:09 PM »

Perhaps... it's not gonna boost low ends any.  As you know, a straight resistor (negligible reactance at audio) will broaden the frequency response as well as decrease harmonic distortion.  If you shunt the FB loop to ground with a cap, it will tend to effectively boost HF (essentially cut LF) as the HF aren't in the FB loop anymore, and your THD will increase.  

Of course if you choose your FB loop components improperly and get a pole somewhere in the bandwidth of the amp you'll end up with oscillation!
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
wavebourn
Guest
« Reply #6 on: June 02, 2005, 09:10:08 PM »

I hope it helps:

http://wavebourn.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=29
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.073 seconds with 18 queries.