The AM Forum
April 29, 2024, 01:37:21 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: EZNEC People: Question  (Read 11962 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 421


« on: November 07, 2020, 12:16:49 PM »

Would someone to be kind enough to simulate this antenna, with some variations:

1) As depicted on 40 and 20

2) On 40 and 20, but with the vertical parts extended to 22 feet, and the horizontal parts shortened in accord.

3) Based on a 65 foot 40 meter dipole, run a simulation with the vertical elements 14 feet long, and the horizontal elements 18.5 feet, on 20, 15, and 10 meters.

Thanks!!

http://n4trb.com/AmateurRadio/RCA_Ham_Tips/issues/rcahamtips1203.pdf
Logged
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 421


« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2020, 01:51:48 PM »

......In each case, bottom horizontal wire 8 feet above ground. 

A detail I forgot to mention.

Thanks!
Logged
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2652


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2020, 08:22:20 PM »

http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?topic=32911.0

I have often wanted to build this antenna, but only had towers and masts to hold it up.

I have a few trees now, may check it out again.


--Shane
KD6VXI
Logged
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 421


« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2020, 08:52:06 PM »

In the situation I mentioned at 3), the antenna would be much smaller.  Good for local on 40, but strong end fire performance on 20......someone simulate the other two bands.

This antenna would be much smaller than the original, and might be a good bet for some.

Use a zepp feeder and a 1:1 current balun.........or a zepp with OWL and a tuna.

:-)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2020, 10:34:06 AM »

Would someone to be kind enough to simulate this antenna, with some variations:

1) As depicted on 40 and 20

2) On 40 and 20, but with the vertical parts extended to 22 feet, and the horizontal parts shortened in accord.

3) Based on a 65 foot 40 meter dipole, run a simulation with the vertical elements 14 feet long, and the horizontal elements 18.5 feet, on 20, 15, and 10 meters.

Thanks!!

http://n4trb.com/AmateurRadio/RCA_Ham_Tips/issues/rcahamtips1203.pdf
Feed point impedance vs frequency for 40 Meters, bottom wire @20 feet, Vswr circle: 10:1, graph S21.
Bottom wire @ 8 feet,  Feed point Impedance @ 7.2 Mhz: 411+j3551


* image20J.jpg (135.85 KB, 715x715 - viewed 259 times.)
Logged
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 421


« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2020, 02:34:00 PM »

Thanks!

Is that for 1, 2, or 3?

Do you have EZNEC plots as well?

Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2020, 06:39:55 PM »

Thanks!

Is that for 1, 2, or 3?

Do you have EZNEC plots as well?


Here's  1


* Plot3D.JPG (457.86 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 205 times.)

* Elevation Plot.JPG (258.97 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 216 times.)

* Azimuth Plot.JPG (296.4 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 221 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2020, 06:46:14 PM »

Thanks!

Is that for 1, 2, or 3?

Do you have EZNEC plots as well?


Here's 1


* Swr.JPG (348.17 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 209 times.)

* 3D 20M Plot.JPG (355.83 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 206 times.)

* Azimuth 20M Plot.JPG (293.78 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 210 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2020, 06:48:03 PM »

Thanks!

Is that for 1, 2, or 3?

Do you have EZNEC plots as well?


Here's 1


* Elevation 20M Plot.JPG (260.72 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 207 times.)

* SWR 20M.JPG (372.93 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 209 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2020, 07:24:07 PM »

Matt for condition 2, is each vertical part 11 or 22 feet long?
Logged
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 421


« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2020, 02:15:48 PM »

Joe:

For condition 2, the vertical parts are 22 feet, with the two horizontal parts shortened proportionally.  In other words, each horizontal member is shortened by 10 feet.  I want to see what happens to the pattern on 40, 20, and 15.

Thanks!!!!
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2020, 11:56:22 PM »

Joe:

For condition 2, the vertical parts are 22 feet, with the two horizontal parts shortened proportionally.  In other words, each horizontal member is shortened by 10 feet.  I want to see what happens to the pattern on 40, 20, and 15.

Thanks!!!!
Matt, Condition 2


* EPSON133.JPG (451.24 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 206 times.)

* EPSON134.JPG (262.55 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 203 times.)

* EPSON135.JPG (297.15 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 194 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2020, 12:00:23 AM »

Joe:

For condition 2, the vertical parts are 22 feet, with the two horizontal parts shortened proportionally.  In other words, each horizontal member is shortened by 10 feet.  I want to see what happens to the pattern on 40, 20, and 15.

Thanks!!!!
Matt, Condition 2


* EPSON136.JPG (357.26 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 189 times.)

* EPSON137.JPG (386.9 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 204 times.)

* EPSON138.JPG (264.86 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 204 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #13 on: November 29, 2020, 12:01:48 AM »

Thanks!

Is that for 1, 2, or 3?

Do you have EZNEC plots as well?


Matt, condition 2


* EPSON139.JPG (300.07 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 201 times.)

* EPSON140.JPG (388.53 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 196 times.)

* EPSON141.JPG (351.33 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 186 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #14 on: November 29, 2020, 12:02:47 AM »

Thanks!

Is that for 1, 2, or 3?

Do you have EZNEC plots as well?


Matt, condition 2


* EPSON142.JPG (257.9 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 191 times.)

* EPSON143.JPG (267.82 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 177 times.)

* EPSON144.JPG (419.61 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 181 times.)
Logged
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 421


« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2020, 12:31:41 PM »

I like it on 40 and 20 meters.  Not so much on 15 meters.

How about 16 foot vertical elements?

Thanks!
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #16 on: November 29, 2020, 09:39:30 PM »

I like it on 40 and 20 meters.  Not so much on 15 meters.

How about 16 foot vertical elements?

Thanks!
Matt for 40M and 20M with 16 foot vertical legs:  The radiation patterns looks identical to the 12 foot vertical element model. Only minor gain changes, 40M max gain 1.09 dbi, 20M max gain 6.13 dbi.  For 15M it is different as shown.     


* EPSON141.JPG (351.33 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 189 times.)

* EPSON142.JPG (257.9 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 191 times.)

* EPSON143.JPG (267.82 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 188 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #17 on: November 29, 2020, 09:40:35 PM »

I like it on 40 and 20 meters.  Not so much on 15 meters.

How about 16 foot vertical elements?

Thanks!
VSWR/ Z for 16 foot vertical elements


* EPSON144.JPG (419.61 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 196 times.)
Logged
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 421


« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2020, 12:09:19 PM »

Joe:

Did you put the 15 meter plots for 22 foot legs up instead of the one for 16 foot legs?

I QSL the other information.  As far as I am concerned, 40 and 20 are the two bands of interest.

Based on all of this, folks on the board can make informed decisions on building one.

Of course, you can make a half sized version, and get good end fire on 20 meters.  I would make the vertical legs about 9 feet for that one.

Thanks!
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #19 on: November 30, 2020, 04:31:38 PM »

Joe:

Did you put the 15 meter plots for 22 foot legs up instead of the one for 16 foot legs?

I QSL the other information.  As far as I am concerned, 40 and 20 are the two bands of interest.

Based on all of this, folks on the board can make informed decisions on building one.

Of course, you can make a half sized version, and get good end fire on 20 meters.  I would make the vertical legs about 9 feet for that one.

Thanks!
Sorry Matt  I did up loaded the wrong files. Here are the correct files


* EPSON145.JPG (378.68 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 197 times.)

* EPSON146.JPG (267.06 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 186 times.)

* EPSON147.JPG (274.19 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 193 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #20 on: November 30, 2020, 04:32:42 PM »

Joe:

Did you put the 15 meter plots for 22 foot legs up instead of the one for 16 foot legs?

I QSL the other information.  As far as I am concerned, 40 and 20 are the two bands of interest.

Based on all of this, folks on the board can make informed decisions on building one.

Of course, you can make a half sized version, and get good end fire on 20 meters.  I would make the vertical legs about 9 feet for that one.

Thanks!
Sorry Matt  I did up loaded the wrong files. Here are the correct files


* EPSON148.JPG (430.75 KB, 1688x2188 - viewed 195 times.)
Logged
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 421


« Reply #21 on: December 01, 2020, 04:16:44 PM »

Many thanks again Joe!  I just remembered that 15 meters was not one of the bands for the beast anyway.

With a zepp feeder and a balanced tuna, it would be a great antenna for the money and size.

Speaking of 15 meters.........

Make a 32 x 12 version of it.  Cloud burn on 60 meters, but good end fire on 30 meters, and broad side on 15 meters.  Narrow band digital and CW people might like that one.

:-)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #22 on: December 03, 2020, 09:56:55 PM »

Many thanks again Joe!  I just remembered that 15 meters was not one of the bands for the beast anyway.

With a zepp feeder and a balanced tuna, it would be a great antenna for the money and size.

Speaking of 15 meters.........

Make a 32 x 12 version of it.  Cloud burn on 60 meters, but good end fire on 30 meters, and broad side on 15 meters.  Narrow band digital and CW people might like that one.

:-)

Matt what antenna configuration are you going to use and for which bands?  What  length and type of open wire transmission line?   
Logged
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 421


« Reply #23 on: December 04, 2020, 03:15:15 PM »

Very good Joe!

I am probably going to put up the antenna based on the 80 meter dipole.  So, 16 or 18 feet vertical portions for good end fire on 40 meters.  Broadside on 20 meters should be decent.  10 meters not a priority as I would use a small, dedicated antenna for that band.

Feed: It will be high Z on both 40 and 20.  So, zepp feeder with short at 1/4 or 3/4 wave point.  Tap in above short with 1:1 current balun and coax. Alternatively, tap in end to side with 600 OWL and a tuner.  Zepp feeder will be made out of #14 THHN, with bare wire on the bottom part to facilitate short and tap.

Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 157


« Reply #24 on: December 05, 2020, 01:25:46 AM »

Very good Joe!

I am probably going to put up the antenna based on the 80 meter dipole.  So, 16 or 18 feet vertical portions for good end fire on 40 meters.  Broadside on 20 meters should be decent.  10 meters not a priority as I would use a small, dedicated antenna for that band.

Feed: It will be high Z on both 40 and 20.  So, zepp feeder with short at 1/4 or 3/4 wave point.  Tap in above short with 1:1 current balun and coax. Alternatively, tap in end to side with 600 OWL and a tuner.  Zepp feeder will be made out of #14 THHN, with bare wire on the bottom part to facilitate short and tap.


"Zepp feeder with short at 1/4 or 3/4 wave point"  Do you mean a shorted length of 600 ohm transmission line at either point Matt?  I'm interested in your matching scheme. Can you give me more detail. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.069 seconds with 18 queries.