The AM Forum
May 23, 2024, 08:49:16 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Coax leakage?  (Read 2266 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
KC2TAU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 277


« on: August 26, 2015, 10:24:53 PM »


I have a roller cart that has most of my equipment on it and I'd like to make it easy to disconnect the multiple coax cables running to it without having to disconnect each coax cable at the source on the cart. With that in mind I've decided to build a simple junction box that consisting of little more than a Hammond case with three holes drilled in it to accept 3 Amphenol UG-363/U bulkhead coax connectors. Essentially they'll thread through the holes and be secured on each side with nuts. The coax cables coming from the various pieces of equipment on the cart will connect on one side where the coax cables coming from my various antennas will connect on the other end.

One of my antennas is a PA0RDT active whip antenna. Given how it uses various transistors that are most likely sensitive to RF I was wondering about RF leakage at this junction box. The bulkhead connectors will probably be spaced at about an inch apart from each other. Maximum power through the junction box would be about 100-120W carrier.

I'm not well versed on where and how much leakage occurs in coax assembles but would this setup be a concern to the RF sensitive active antenna?
Logged
W7TFO
WTF-OVER in 7 land Dennis
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2469


IN A TRIODE NO ONE CAN HEAR YOUR SCREEN


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 27, 2015, 12:04:09 AM »

If things are matched (none or little VSWR), there will be negligible leakage from the bulkhead connectors.

The leakage, if any, will come from coax with just braid shield.  Coax with foil under braid will perform better in that arena.

It will also depend on the power levels involved.

73DG
 
Logged

Just pacing the Farady cage...
KA0HCP
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1185



« Reply #2 on: August 27, 2015, 12:19:39 PM »

Be sure to mop up any electron spills so no one is injured in falls! 

p.s. Light colored clothing may be stained.   Wink
Logged

New callsign KA0HCP, ex-KB4QAA.  Relocated to Kansas in April 2019.
WD5JKO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1996


WD5JKO


« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2015, 01:25:56 PM »


  If I were worried about "coax leakage", then I'd do two things:

1.) use double shielded coax, such as RG-223, or RG-400 for the little stuff, or RG-214 for the big stuff.

2.) use a controlled impedance connection that screws on, such as a TNC, or type N. The BNC is OK, but can leak if tugged from a side angle.

For sure, the SO-239/SO-238 and UG-363/U are out the window in any RF tight application. They have an impedance bump, and connection leakage is hard to keep low. The slightest loosening can have a profound effect on "coax leakage".

Jim
Wd5JKO
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.032 seconds with 17 queries.