The AM Forum
April 27, 2024, 05:17:53 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: DX100B HIGH SWR ON AM  (Read 12487 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ve6pg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1114



« on: January 26, 2014, 04:57:26 PM »

..tune up the dx100b in cw, switch to phone and swr is through the roof..plate current is good, grid current etc in cw...it acts weird on AM only...sometimes the rig is werking fb, on AM, THEN swr jumps up during a transmission....ideas?

..sk..
Logged

...Yes, my name is Tim Smith...sk..
kb3ouk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1640

The Voice of Fulton County


« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2014, 05:26:35 PM »

What is between the transmitter and the antenna and where in that lineup are you measuring SWR? Sounds like something is overheating, had a similiar problem once, turned out to be the SWR meter itself was heating up and shorting out.
Logged

Clarke's Second Law: The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is by venturing a little past them into the impossible
N2DTS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2307


« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2014, 06:09:48 PM »

You are putting out a lot of power off frequency, or something is changing in the antenna/tuner/feedline during AM.
Logged
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5055


« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2014, 08:00:55 PM »

might be something going wild in the modulator to generate a lot of different frequencies in the output.
Can you monitor the RF output of the DX100 with a receiver to listen for any strange sounds when PTT is pressed and AM mode?
Does the DX100 monitor anything in the modulator circuit? Grid current of the modulator tubes?
Something is making a very different RF output in the final to make the SWR increase.
Fred
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
ve6pg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1114



« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2014, 08:45:17 PM »

all appears ok, freq counter shows no odd transmit freq, etc...swr bridge has been changed, no difference...not been inside the rig as yet...
Logged

...Yes, my name is Tim Smith...sk..
KA8WTK
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 874



« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2014, 08:59:12 PM »

Does it do it into a dummy load?
Logged

Bill KA8WTK
Steve - K4HX
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2727



« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2014, 09:14:50 PM »

Tuned up on a harmonic.
Logged
kb2vxa
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 162


I modulate, therefore AM


« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2014, 09:34:37 PM »

He says no odd frequency shows up on a counter. What about the antenna? I once knew a tri-band beam with a trap problem, sometimes it resonated on 10M, sometimes on 11M. Is there a resonant circuit up there? Do you use a tuner? We need more info, a transmitter change from CW to AM affecting SWR sounds mighty weird. Could be since you only apply RF briefly during tune up on CW the problem is far less likely to show up then.
Logged

73 de Warren KB2VXA
Station powered by atomic energy, operator powered by natural gas.
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5055


« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2014, 08:34:57 AM »

He says no odd frequency shows up on a counter. What about the antenna? I once knew a tri-band beam with a trap problem, sometimes it resonated on 10M, sometimes on 11M. Is there a resonant circuit up there? Do you use a tuner? We need more info, a transmitter change from CW to AM affecting SWR sounds mighty weird. Could be since you only apply RF briefly during tune up on CW the problem is far less likely to show up then.
I had the same thing on a 4CX1500B final. Tuned up perfectly and no signs of weirdness on the meters.
Something made me tune the RX for the second harmonic and there it was.
Freq counter is useless. A spectrum analyzer or an SDR will show it pretty fast.
Fred
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
WD5JKO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1997


WD5JKO


« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2014, 08:59:21 AM »


On CW or tune up there is 100 watts +/-. On a modulation peak the peak power goes up 4X or so. An arc or flashover somewhere in the tuner / transmission line / antenna will cause the SWR to spike during an audio peak. I have an SO-238 coupling outside, and I have lost three of these in the last few years. They get wet inside, and then I blow them up. The reflected power hits the ceiling during the arc.

Jim
Wd5JKO
Logged
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5055


« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2014, 11:53:20 AM »


On CW or tune up there is 100 watts +/-. On a modulation peak the peak power goes up 4X or so. An arc or flashover somewhere in the tuner / transmission line / antenna will cause the SWR to spike during an audio peak. I have an SO-238 coupling outside, and I have lost three of these in the last few years. They get wet inside, and then I blow them up. The reflected power hits the ceiling during the arc.

Jim
Wd5JKO

Good observation of the OP and how he described the problem. Modulation causes spike in SWR.
Forget the second harmonic
Fred
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
k7pp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 63


« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2014, 11:58:31 AM »

Are you using a peak reading wattmeter?  VSWR may appear to rise on audio peaks

I did a quick video to illustrate what I'm asking but, perhaps you are taking about VSWR rising without
any change in peak forward power?Huh?

Here's a link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHkXQ56RojM
Logged
WD5JKO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1997


WD5JKO


« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2014, 12:31:16 PM »


nice video....as you said though, the VSWR was constant at 1.5;1....This is normal. With the wattmeter on the higher sensitivity scale, the VSWR was also constant, but off the chart.

Back to my original post, if modulation causes VSWR to spike (like 1.5:1 to > 10:1), then something is either arcing (after the swr/wattmeter), OR (I am adding this now) the RF final is going into a modulation induced parasitic.

Jim
Wd5JKO
Logged
AB2EZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1722


"Season's Greetings" looks okay to me...


« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2014, 01:07:50 PM »

I agree that a significant change in the transmitter's output frequency, or the introduction of a much larger percentage of harmonic power, would cause the VSWR on the coaxial cable connected to the output port to jump up. For example, having most of the total output power of the transmitter switch from the fundamental to the 2nd harmonic of the nominal carrier frequency.

However, what is puzzling is that this transmitter has a pi network at its output... which should present a low impedance to any component of the plate current flowing through the output tubes whose frequency is the 2nd harmonic or a higher harmonic of the frequency that the pi network is tuned to (and also to high frequency parasitic components of the output tubes' plate current).* In fact, a class C plate current waveform contains lots of 2nd and higher harmonics... and the pi network's low impedance at harmonic frequencies prevents significant harmonic voltage from appearing across the output port of the transmitter.

*The component of the plate current at the resonant frequency of the pi network produces a voltage across the load impedance (the impedance of the loading capacitor in parallel with the output load) that is approximately: the amplitude of that component of the plate current x the load impedance at that frequency x the Q of pi network. The component of the plate current at the 2nd harmonic of the resonant frequency of the pi network produces a voltage across load impedance that is only: the amplitude of that component of the plate current x the load impedance at that frequency x 1/3.

Therefore, if the pi network is functioning properly, I would think that the forward (from the transmitter toward the antenna) output power of the transmitter would decrease dramatically (in addition to the VSWR on the coaxial cable connected to the output port going up) under most scenarios that are associated with such things as a significant increase in harmonic content in the output tubes' plate current or a parasitic oscillation of the plate current.

I suspect that something is arcing or opening on the antenna side of the SWR meter.
Examples: A) Switching to AM causes a marginal (high resistance) connection on the antenna side of the SWR meter to heat up... and, after a few thermal time constants, the connection opens up. B) An arc forms across the feedline to the antenna on an AM positive modulation peak; and the arc is sustained once it forms... until the carrier is dropped for at least a few milliseconds. C) A conducting path forms within a trap in a multiband antenna due to the breakdown of an insulator.

Stu  
Logged

Stewart ("Stu") Personick. Pictured: (from The New Yorker) "Season's Greetings" looks OK to me. Let's run it by the legal department
ve6pg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1114



« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2014, 04:38:00 PM »

..appears something in the driver stage...less drive and retuning the driver lessens the issue...still there...5763 or 12by7, or clamp adjustment...no time to get inside as yet..
..sk..
Logged

...Yes, my name is Tim Smith...sk..
WD5JKO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1997


WD5JKO


« Reply #15 on: January 29, 2014, 08:57:46 PM »

Keep in mind that reduced drive means reduced peak power on AM. Reduced peak power could keep the arc from happening, hence stable SWR.

Going off on a tangent...see me Gonset story below.

There was never a mention of which band this is happening. On my Gonset G-76 with the Knight V44 VFO, I multiply 12X to get to 15 meters. That VFO always runs on Top Band. If I detune my driver stage, (15m now) I can see harmonic or wrong multiplication factor content on the scope. With a slow sweep, I get horizontal lines just within the carrier horizontal edges. Playing with the drive tuning, I can make this worse, or better. Neutralization comes into play hera as well, since if perfectly neutralized, the grid current peak in TUNE is correct in TRANSMIT. If the neutralization is off, then I have to peak the drive tuning in TRANSMIT at reduced drive setting in order to peak out the modulation to fullest value, then increase the drive to specifications.

Jim
Wd5JKO
Logged
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5055


« Reply #16 on: January 29, 2014, 09:01:21 PM »


Keep in mind that reduced drive means reduced peak power on AM. Reduced peak power could keep the arc from happening, hence stable SWR.

Going off on a tangent...see me Gonset story below.

There was never a mention of which band this is happening. On my Gonset G-76 with the Knight V44 VFO, I multiply 12X to get to 15 meters. That VFO always runs on Top Band. If I detune my driver stage, (15m now) I can see harmonic or wrong multiplication factor content on the scope. With a slow sweep, I get horizontal lines just within the carrier horizontal edges. Playing with the drive tuning, I can make this worse, or better. Neutralization comes into play hera as well, since if perfectly neutralized, the grid current peak in LOAD is correct in TRANSMIT. If the neutralization is off, then I have to peak the drive tuning in TRANSMIT at reduced drive setting in order to peak out the modulation to fullest value, then increase the drive to specifications.

Jim
Wd5JKO

Also over-driving the 6146 finals can be worse.
3 ma is the max Huh?
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
N2DTS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2307


« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2014, 09:45:30 PM »

What is the antenna?

One fond memory of my dx-100 was zorching traps in various antenna's with it.

Logged
VE3AJM
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 378



« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2014, 01:09:03 AM »

Tims antenna is a 780 ft loop fed with OWL. Its happening on 80m. Don't think he has a dummy load.

I'm guessing that you're having an issue with an intermittent/bad connection at the antenna feed point. You've had this issue at least once before this winter as I recall, with all the high winds, ice storms and the snow with an antenna of that size, and with issues supporting it adequately. Things did seem to clear up when you tied the OWL feeders together, and fed the antenna as a long wire.

Looks like you may finally have to do some troubleshooting with that DX-100 Tim. You do have a few parts/non-working DX-100s there, so you have plenty of spare parts if needed. Smiley

Al VE3AJM
Logged
W7NGA
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 127


« Reply #19 on: January 30, 2014, 07:43:00 AM »

This is a classic problem of course, but nothing can be ascertained until you load directly into your dummy load and assess performance with a resistive load rated beyond your peak power.

daniel
Logged
N2DTS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2307


« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2014, 01:58:43 PM »

Well, that is the problem, the antenna is too short...
780 feet, might as well use a hand held antenna.


Tims antenna is a 780 ft loop fed with OWL. Its happening on 80m. Don't think he has a dummy load.

I'm guessing that you're having an issue with an intermittent/bad connection at the antenna feed point. You've had this issue at least once before this winter as I recall, with all the high winds, ice storms and the snow with an antenna of that size, and with issues supporting it adequately. Things did seem to clear up when you tied the OWL feeders together, and fed the antenna as a long wire.

Looks like you may finally have to do some troubleshooting with that DX-100 Tim. You do have a few parts/non-working DX-100s there, so you have plenty of spare parts if needed. Smiley

Al VE3AJM
Logged
ve6pg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1114



« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2014, 05:12:02 PM »

there never was any arcing..into the dummy load it does the same thing...tunes up fine in cw, but in am it has a high swr...the rig has not been hot switched, etc...

..sk..
Logged

...Yes, my name is Tim Smith...sk..
ve6pg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1114



« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2014, 07:12:00 PM »

..should add, this happens even without any audio...mic not connected, and gain turned down...
..sk..
Logged

...Yes, my name is Tim Smith...sk..
AB2EZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1722


"Season's Greetings" looks okay to me...


« Reply #23 on: January 30, 2014, 07:37:26 PM »

It is very strange that the VSWR reading with a 50 ohm dummy load attached to the antenna-side connector of the SWR/power meter would be anything except 1:1.

If the SWR/power meter is working properly, if the link between the meter's antenna-side connector and the dummy load (which could be a single coaxial jumper cable, or multiple coaxial jumper cables, in series, interconnected by barrels) is, in fact, a 50 ohm impedance link; and if the dummy load is, in fact, a 50 ohm dummy load.... then the meter should register an SWR of 1:1 when the transmitter produces output power, regardless of the details of what is happening on the transmitter side of the meter.

I am assuming that there is nothing between the meter and the dummy load that is frequency selective (e.g. no antenna tuner between the meter and the dummy load).

Have you checked to see if the cable between the SWR/power meter and the dummy load has a loose shield at either connector, or a tendency to form a short circuit at one of the connectors? Is the center conductor making good contact to the connector center pin at each end, and is the connector center pin making good contact to the socket at each end?

Separately, with the dummy load attached, does the VSWR reading jump up if you tune up on CW, and then run the transmitter on CW, key down, for 2 minutes?

Stu

Logged

Stewart ("Stu") Personick. Pictured: (from The New Yorker) "Season's Greetings" looks OK to me. Let's run it by the legal department
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5055


« Reply #24 on: January 30, 2014, 08:44:43 PM »

I agree with Stu.....A dummy load is a poor indicator to show reflected power.
You need a frequency sensitive load like an antenna known to be good. An MFJ259 is a good start to get an idea what's going on with your antenna.
Got it a little clearer now. Switch to AM and NO MODULATION.
Try this........pull the modulator tubes ( TX off ,,, the tubes are cold) and see what happens when you TX in the AM mode. Go through the scenario of CW first and then AM mode with the mod tubes pulled out of their sockets. TX off and allowed to cool down OR you will burn your fingers
Fred
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.049 seconds with 18 queries.