GEORGE/W2AMR
Guest
|
|
« on: December 14, 2011, 06:17:51 AM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WQ9E
Member
Offline
Posts: 3285
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2011, 06:47:59 AM » |
|
George,
It looks very good.
A Star Roamer was the very first kit I built when I was 11. I later built an external BFO for it from a Popular Electronics article. A few years ago I paired it up with a Knight T-60 just so I could make one contact with the Star Roamer.
The T-60 is now paired with a Knight R-195 and I acquired a Star Roamer II (solid state) which looks nice but I don't think it works as well as the original.
I thought that there was another tube type Knight kit receiver of the Star Roamer era (post R-100A) that was a bit more sophisticated but I haven't come across any information on one so it could be a case of faulty memory.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Rodger WQ9E
|
|
|
WA3VJB
Guest
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2011, 07:37:34 AM » |
|
VGood, George.
This is the sort of receiver a kid would get for Christmas. I was just thinking about getting a Shady O'Rack DX-120 about forty years ago, and exchanging it for the DX-150A soon after, using some of my grass-cutting money from the previous summer.
There was some magic listening to the international BC stations back then. I still have a mess of pennants, stickers and old programme schedules, after becoming a "member" from sending -x- number of verified reception reports.
Now I presume a broadcaster can just use a remote monitoring service or computer modeling to determine how they are potentially being heard anywhere they are trying to put in a signal.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bill, KD0HG
Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 2544
304-TH - Workin' it
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2011, 09:20:28 AM » |
|
A Star Roamer was the first kit I ever built when I was a kid. Yes, it was a Christmas gift. Went over to Allied Radio at 100 N. Western Avenue to pick it up with my dad. Whotta ham department they had!
I doubt that today manufacturers would sell any kit connected to the AC power lines.
Bill, WPE9GPI
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WB2EMS
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 633
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2011, 09:41:58 AM » |
|
Man I'm jealous. I spent *years* drooling over that receiver in the Allied catalogs. Never got one, but my first receiver later was a used Knight Kit R-100 which I did a lot of SWLing with and used as my first shack receiver. It wasn't as pretty, but it probably worked a bit better having a few more stages in it and a real BFO. Fun stuff. Made radio accessible to us as kids.
|
|
|
Logged
|
73 de Kevin, WB2EMS
|
|
|
Tim WA1HnyLR
Member
Offline
Posts: 159
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2011, 10:17:24 AM » |
|
I have had two Star Roamers in my time so far. The first one I put double tuned IF cans in it to improve the selectivity. Unfortunately it came with the expense of gain . I lost it in the fire of '92. I came across another one that was made in Japan. Probably a so called Factory assembled model. I De-Hnyellphyied the audio. and put a full wave bridge rectifier in the power supply. I put a muting circuit into it. I teamed it up with a modified T-60. It makes a great piss weaker station. De Tim WA1HnyLR
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
W3GMS
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 3042
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2011, 01:03:47 PM » |
|
The Star Roamer was the competitor to the Heathkit GR-64. Both were from the same vintage and I believe they both sold for around 39 dollars. I had the GR-64 but always thought the Star Roamer looked cooler! Knight had some good styling folks. I now have both the GR-64 and the Star Roamer. It would be interesting to see how they compare in performance. Joe, W3GMS
|
|
|
Logged
|
Simplicity is the Elegance of Design---W3GMS
|
|
|
AL7FS
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 39
|
|
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2011, 01:14:09 PM » |
|
I had not thought of the Star Roamer in some time. Yep, I must join the "me, too" crowd. I built one of these in about 1964 or 1965. I don't think mine ever worked well. I had no Elmer, no test equipment, no training and was 16 years old. In spite of that, I fondly remember building the kit and beginning to learn how to solder. Jim, AL7FS http://www.AL7FS.us/Anchorage, AK
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KE2EE
Member
Offline
Posts: 11
|
|
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2011, 06:53:58 PM » |
|
My best friend who lived across the street got one for Christmas. We were in the 8th grade at the time. After building it, it didn't light up. He brought it over and I found two cold solders. What a thrill when that thing came to life ! Later I got a National NC-77x, similar but with no LW band. Did anyone ever copy anything on that LW band ?
Mike
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bill, KD0HG
Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 2544
304-TH - Workin' it
|
|
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2011, 07:38:13 PM » |
|
Did anyone ever copy anything on that LW band ?
Mike
It was awful. Just a bunch of BCB images.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WQ9E
Member
Offline
Posts: 3285
|
|
« Reply #10 on: December 14, 2011, 08:42:40 PM » |
|
Did anyone ever copy anything on that LW band ?
Mike
It was awful. Just a bunch of BCB images. I remember a couple of airport beacons. There weren't many BCB stations on the Mississippi gulf coast to cause images and the nearest powerhouse station would have been WWL in NOLA 70 miles away. I remember the internal BFO did not work well on mine and I found it easier to copy using the quieting of background noise on 40 meters instead of using the BFO. My next kit building experience was a Science Fair Globe Patrol 3 transistor regen (detector plus 2 stages of audio). It would out perform the Star Roamer above 7 Mhz. I remember listening to Radio Netherlands quite a lot on the little regen. Two years ago I found a Globe Patrol that was still new in box and Santa Claus brought that to our daughter for Christmas. She built it with a lot of assistance (she was 6) and it works pretty well but it is sitting on a Hallicrafters SX-42 in her room and although it can out perform a Star Roamer it doesn't outperform a restored and aligned SX-42.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Rodger WQ9E
|
|
|
GEORGE/W2AMR
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2011, 05:45:49 AM » |
|
VGood, George.
This is the sort of receiver a kid would get for Christmas. This kid got it for Christmas last August.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim W8DRZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 26
|
|
« Reply #12 on: December 22, 2011, 01:37:04 AM » |
|
I always wanted a Star Roamer. At age 12, in 1963 I saved up enough lawn mowing money to buy a Knight-Kit Span Master. I still have it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jim - W8DRZ ----------------- WLRO, WOBL, WBNO, WHFD, WJW
|
|
|
N4LTA
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 1070
|
|
« Reply #13 on: December 22, 2011, 09:14:09 AM » |
|
I bought one cheap on Ebay a couple of years ago. Some knucklehead had drilled a 1/2" hole in the front panel under the s meter where the Knight emblem is. I bought it because I always wante don as a kid.
I need to find a way to cover that hole up?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WQ9E
Member
Offline
Posts: 3285
|
|
« Reply #14 on: December 22, 2011, 09:42:10 AM » |
|
I bought one cheap on Ebay a couple of years ago. Some knucklehead had drilled a 1/2" hole in the front panel under the s meter where the Knight emblem is. I bought it because I always wante don as a kid.
I need to find a way to cover that hole up?
Probably the grandson of the guy who drilled a hole through the National emblem on my NC-100X. Perhaps it is time for a pilot lamp for you Star Roamer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Rodger WQ9E
|
|
|
WU2D
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 1797
CW is just a narrower version of AM
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2011, 05:52:04 PM » |
|
Top Receivers
1. Knight Star Roamer 2. Heath HR10B 3. Collins HF2050 4. Drake MSR-2 5. TEN TEC RX340 6. Racal 6790 7. WJ-8888 8. Collins HF8054 9. Rohde & Schwarz EK-07 10. Eddystone 1830/1
|
|
|
Logged
|
These are the good old days of AM
|
|
|
Steve - K4HX
Guest
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2011, 06:54:38 PM » |
|
You forgot the S-20R, the finest receiver ever made.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Todd, KA1KAQ
Administrator
Member
Offline
Posts: 4244
AMbassador
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 23, 2011, 12:12:59 AM » |
|
Well suited for feeding an outside speaker, I've heard. The Sky Buddy just didn't measure up.
Look around, George. You can probably find a decent replacement panel from a donor unit. Or just stick a plug in it. Those panels weren't terribly thick as I recall, so making a permanent repair would be a challenge.
|
|
|
Logged
|
known as The Voice of Vermont in a previous life
|
|
|
WU2D
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 1797
CW is just a narrower version of AM
|
|
« Reply #18 on: December 23, 2011, 10:44:42 PM » |
|
That Star Roamer will be a fun rig to use on shortwave. It would benefit from a Q multiplier. The Sky Buddy that I did up for my friend Frank WA1VNR, was sounding good and it had fairly good audio but it really pepped up after I made a Q multiplier for it seen on the left in the silver box. Frank says it makes all the difference in the world with the radio. It is simply a peaking type with a single 6J5.
Mike WU2D
|
|
|
Logged
|
These are the good old days of AM
|
|
|
John K5PRO
Member
Offline
Posts: 1026
|
|
« Reply #19 on: December 24, 2011, 03:17:57 AM » |
|
That was my first kit too, around 1968. Wonder where it went.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
N4LTA
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 1070
|
|
« Reply #20 on: December 24, 2011, 10:39:56 AM » |
|
If anyone knows of a junker with a complete front panel - Let me know.
Pat N4LTA
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|