The AM Forum
May 22, 2024, 02:02:36 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: K4HX recorded today on 40 meters  (Read 9594 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WB4AIO
WB4AIO
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 242


Better fidelity means better communication.


WWW
« on: October 16, 2011, 04:27:14 PM »

I can't transmit from my present location -- my antenna is in a noisy location and is hidden on a fence only three feet off the ground -- but K4HX had such a big signal on 40 meters this afternoon that I was able to record him in my modified Racal 6790's full 20 kHz bandwidth:

http://liberty.3950.net/K4HX_20111016_0330pm_7295kHz_20kHzBW.mp3

Excellent sound, with an intense high end reminiscent of K3ZRF.

73,

Kevin, WB4AIO.
Logged

WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2011, 09:01:57 PM »

Any sync detect on that, Kevin ?

If not, the reception at this selectivity is all the more impressive with this kind of s/n ratio during certain moments.

Logged
WB4AIO
WB4AIO
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 242


Better fidelity means better communication.


WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2011, 09:37:58 PM »

It's the standard Racal pseudo-sync detector (some call it a synchrodyne) in which the received signal is heavily limited and then applied to the carrier input of a product detector. It's inferior to a real sync detector. Although it does stay linear with large positive peaks, and it can't ever lose sync, it is no help during deep selective fades compared to a diode, and it causes noticeably more distortion than a diode detector if presented with in excess of 100% negative modulation (actual carrier cutoff).

All the credit goes to Steve for, on peaks at least, providing a full-quieting carrier!

Kevin, WB4AIO.
Logged

KX5JT
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1948


John-O-Phonic


« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2011, 11:52:28 PM »

Where Freq?  7.160 or 7.290ish?



edit:  Nevermind.. I see the header says 7290 Smiley


" KALIEDOSCOPE FOUR HALF-TRACK XYLOPHONE! "  Cool  Beautiful Steve!

Logged

AMI#1684
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5047


« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2011, 06:46:32 AM »

WOW Steve must have something BIG there.........and it doesn't sound like a Flex.....200% pos?Huh I like the room sound....like the old SW broadcast of yesteryear...

Fred
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
WD8BIL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4400


« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2011, 10:18:02 AM »

Great sound Steve, as always!

I remember a few years ago putting a 40M element on the antenna at the cabin. Turned on the radio and there you were calling CQ on 7290. Another S9+20 siganiganal!

Great job.
Logged
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4611



« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2011, 01:03:27 PM »

What's amazing to me is the lack of any buzzies, static, TV horizontal, etc.
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
Steve - K4HX
Guest
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2011, 01:06:39 PM »

Thanks for the high quality recording. It's always instructive to hear how your own signal is received another location.

After Todd and I signed, we went and sat on the outside deck for a while and enjoyed the FB WX.
Logged
WB4AIO
WB4AIO
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 242


Better fidelity means better communication.


WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 18, 2011, 01:27:48 PM »

What's amazing to me is the lack of any buzzies, static, TV horizontal, etc.

It amazed me too -- especially considering how close the antenna is to a whole row of houses with twenty-five zillion digital devices running at the same time. Raw signal strength is the answer to everything, except maybe love and hunger.

73,


Kevin, WB4AIO.
Logged

WB4AIO
WB4AIO
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 242


Better fidelity means better communication.


WWW
« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2011, 01:29:20 PM »

Thanks for the high quality recording. It's always instructive to hear how your own signal is received another location.

After Todd and I signed, we went and sat on the outside deck for a while and enjoyed the FB WX.



You're welcome. Your signal looked good on the scope too -- makes me think you are using an effective peak limiter.


Kevin, WB4AIO.
Logged

K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2814



WWW
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2011, 01:47:40 PM »

Raw signal strength is the answer to everything...

This is basically the only weapon we have left in the arsenal against consumer garbage appliance RFI.
That and special receiving methods involving antennas with deep nulls, and phase shifting/nulling networks.

On-going, having a strapping signal is one of the top ways to stay in the game.  Under top condx and the right time of day etc. 50 w. can still work but averaged out over time, QRO wins.   

I'm seeing this with bc stations in the mw band.  It's getting to the point where the minimum is 5 KW for a listener friendly signal; depends on the tx site, dial spot etc. but even 50 KW stations can get RFI induced signal degredation in their primary coverage areas now.. 

Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
Todd, KA1KAQ
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4244


AMbassador


« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2011, 02:45:22 PM »

After Todd and I signed, we went and sat on the outside deck for a while and enjoyed the FB WX.

Yes we did! A cold 807, some salsa and chips, and a blue sky, 70-something-and-sunny day that couldn't be beat. Not a bad way to end the Six Days of NEAR-Fest.  Grin

It was pretty amazing how much activity there was on the higher bands Sunday. 10, 15, 20 meters all had plenty of good signals. Even heard a few AM signals on 10.

TNX for posting the recording, Kevin. The fellow who responded to Steve's CQ was returning to the bands after a long hiatus by the sounds. We also talked with Russ, 'FAU on 40 a bit before that.
Logged

known as The Voice of Vermont in a previous life
Steve - K4HX
Guest
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2011, 02:57:51 PM »

Good call. Using a CRL PMC 300.


Quote

Your signal looked good on the scope too -- makes me think you are using an effective peak limiter.

Logged
W2PFY
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13290



« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2011, 05:15:19 PM »

What is your transmitter Steve? Nice sounding rig!
Logged

The secrecy of my job prevents me from knowing what I am doing.
Ralph W3GL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 748



« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2011, 06:07:57 PM »



Terry,

Stupid question... Go back and listen to the audio clip AGAIN!

Logged

73,  Ralph  W3GL 

"Just because the microphone in front of you amplifies your voice around the world is no reason to think we have any more wisdom than we had when our voices could reach from one end of the bar to the other"     Ed Morrow
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2814



WWW
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2011, 09:56:09 PM »

Steve, how do you like the PMC-300?  I've wondered how it compares to the later models.  They show up from time to time on eBay.
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
Steve - K4HX
Guest
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2011, 10:04:27 PM »

Yep, nothing like a strapping signal. The recording below is one of the best SNRs I've heard in a long time, maybe ever. It's Tim - W3TIM on 160 meters in the early evening a few years ago. He is so strong there is almost no noticeable band noise during most of the recording.



What's amazing to me is the lack of any buzzies, static, TV horizontal, etc.

It amazed me too -- especially considering how close the antenna is to a whole row of houses with twenty-five zillion digital devices running at the same time. Raw signal strength is the answer to everything, except maybe love and hunger.

73,


Kevin, WB4AIO.

* w3tim18dec080315z1885.mp3 (1263.5 KB - downloaded 189 times.)
Logged
Steve - K4HX
Guest
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2011, 10:05:17 PM »

I've been using it for something like 14 years. I guess I like it.


Steve, how do you like the PMC-300?  I've wondered how it compares to the later models.  They show up from time to time on eBay.
Logged
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654



« Reply #18 on: October 20, 2011, 01:20:38 AM »

You feeding to that 1kD Front, back or Center Steve?

C
Logged
Steve - K4HX
Guest
« Reply #19 on: October 20, 2011, 12:10:50 PM »

I’m feeding the audio directly to the balanced modulator via a jack on the back.
Logged
W2PFY
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13290



« Reply #20 on: October 20, 2011, 12:11:36 PM »



Terry,

Stupid question... Go back and listen to the audio clip AGAIN!



You know Ralph, I went back and listened to the clip again and indeed did get the type of transmitter that he was using. I think it would have been much easier if you would have just reminded me that it was a certain type transmitter rather than to command me to go listen again! I get really offended when anyone uses the word "stupid" when it is in reference to me!

But I still think  your a great guy Ralph Grin Grin Grin
Logged

The secrecy of my job prevents me from knowing what I am doing.
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654



« Reply #21 on: October 20, 2011, 02:48:40 PM »

I’m feeding the audio directly to the balanced modulator via a jack on the back.

THanks. I ran some tests with my 1Kd a few years back. Once you do that, Its a damn nice AM rig.  Sounded good man!

C
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.046 seconds with 17 queries.