The AM Forum
April 27, 2024, 08:38:00 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: HR 81 New Amateur Radio Bill Introduced in Congress  (Read 12601 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8315



WWW
« on: January 11, 2011, 11:22:48 PM »

this showed up in my inbox. It would not hurt to write the powers that be and ask them to pass it. It sems to be a way to reduce the annoyances of land use rules and HOA impediments.

> > HR 81 can be found on the web in PDF format at,
> > http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr81ih/pdf/BILLS-112hr81ih.pdf.

[ARLI] Fw: ARLB003 New Amateur Radio Bill Introduced in Congress

To all Amateur Radio Operators:

Okay, this bill has been submitted once again.  This makes the fourth or
fifth time this particular Bill, or a similar version of it, has been
introduced into the House and/or the Senate.  What do we have to do to get
this Bill out of committee and acted upon?

C'mon, fellow hams, get off of your duffs and get cracking on this one!  Ten
years and going is FAR TOO LONG  to be working on a ham radio bill that
should have passed a LONG time ago!  LET'S GO!!  NO EXCUSES THIS TIME!!

I want to see every single member of the club to write a letter to your
Congressman and ask them to support and co-sponsor this Bill.  The more
letters we write, the more Congress will know we are serious and want
something done.  The reason this Bill, or versions of it, died in committee
so many times is because Amateur Radio Operators did NOT CARE ENOUGH about
their hobby to write a simple letter to Congress to get this bill passed.  I
have written a letter to my Congressman each time this Bill was
reintroduced, but I am only one person.  It will take thousands of "one
person's" to get the ball rolling and get HR 81 passed.  Or would you prefer
that our precious frequencies be taken over by commercial operators?

I am challenging each and every one of you to write to your Congressmen and
Congresswomen, and your Senators if and when a Senate version is introduced,
and get this thing moving.  I am already thinking about what I will write to
my Congressman.  Get that fire lit!!

HR 81 has already been referred to a committee.  If we do nothing, it will
end up just like all the bills before it... it will die in committee.  If we
all write our letters, Congress will see that we mean business and that we
care about saving our spectrum, and they will act to get the Bill passed.

Let's not allow what happened last time to happen again.  In the 111th
Congress, a bill was introduced into the House as HR 2160 and referred to a
committee.  The bill died in committee because not enough hams wrote letters
to their Congressmen asking them to sign on as co-sponsors and get the bill
acted upon.  A similar Senate Bill, S 1755, was introduced into the Senate
during the same session, but that bill made it all the way through the
Senate, only to be sideswiped by the House because again, not enough hams
cared enough to write to their Representatives asking them to co-sponsor the
Senate bill.  S 1755 also died in a House committee at the end of the
session.

Every time this Bill was reintroduced, I urged all of my fellow Amateur
Radio Operators to write to Congress to get the bill passed.  I yelled, I
shouted until I was blue in the face, I pleaded... but each time, my urgings
fell upon deaf ears because very few hams actually cared about the issue and
couldn't be bothered to write a letter or even make a phone call.  Let's not
make that mistake a fifth time.

The ball is in your hands, there's one second left on the clock, and you've
got one chance to win the game.  Are you going to take that desperation
shot?  Or will you just hold the ball and let the clock run out once again?
It's your choice; it's up to you.


So the question now is... when are you going to write your letter?


73,

Paul Gray, NŲJAA



----- Original Message -----
From: "ARRL Web site"
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:26 AM
Subject: ARLB003 New Amateur Radio Bill Introduced in Congress


> > SB QST @ ARL $ARLB003
> > ARLB003 New Amateur Radio Bill Introduced in Congress
> >
> > ZCZC AG03
> > QST de W1AW
> > ARRL Bulletin 3  ARLB003
> > From ARRL Headquarters
> > Newington CT  January 11, 2011
> > To all radio amateurs
> >
> > SB QST ARL ARLB003
> > ARLB003 New Amateur Radio Bill Introduced in Congress
> >
> > The Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Enhancement Act, which
> > died at the end of the 111th Congress, has been reintroduced in the
> > 112th Congress as HR 81. The sponsor is Representative Sheila
> > Jackson Lee (D-TX-18). The new bill -- which was introduced on
> > January 5 -- has been referred to the House Committee on Energy and
> > Commerce.
> >
> > Rep Jackson Lee first introduced the bill -- HR 2160 -- in the 111th
> > Congress in April 2009. It gained an additional 41 co-sponsors but
> > did not progress out of the committee of jurisdiction. A similar
> > bill introduced in the Senate -- S 1755 -- made it all the way
> > through that body in December 2009, but likewise was not taken up by
> > the House.
> >
> > The objective of the bill -- which is supported by the ARRL -- is
> > for the Secretary of Homeland Security to study the uses and
> > capabilities of Amateur Radio communications in emergencies and
> > disaster relief and to identify and make recommendations regarding
> > impediments to Amateur Radio communications, such as the effects of
> > private land use regulations on residential antenna installations.
> >
> > "We are hopeful that this early start will lead to success in the
> > new Congress," commented ARRL Chief Executive Officer David Sumner,
> > K1ZZ.
> >
> > HR 81 can be found on the web in PDF format at,
> > http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr81ih/pdf/BILLS-112hr81ih.pdf.
> > NNNN
> > /EX
> >
Logged

Radio Candelstein - Flagship Station of the NRK Radio Network.
KL7OF
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2316



« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2011, 01:45:02 AM »

That Homeland security study makes me worry that somehow in the political way of things that this bill could morph into more restrictions under the guise of HOMELAND SECURITY...I'd hate to have homeland security  making ham radio decisions...I'm not saying this is a bad bill ..Is there any part of this that could be turned against us at some point? I read it and nothing seems obvoius ...I'd like some other opinions.
Logged
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2011, 05:32:06 PM »

I agree that there is risk if we were to surrender what now is a self-determined assessment of our emergency preparedness status and capability.

Outsiders, be it a federal agency or private industry, would have less expertise than participants in evaluating the potential strengths and weaknesses of a hobbyist, non-commercial communications system.

As such, we are the best representatives to continue marketing our infrastructure as part of broader emergency preparedness.

I urge active, concerned licensees to oppose this legislation, or at least decline to promote it.
Logged
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8315



WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2011, 07:57:06 PM »

huh? I didn't see anything in there except things like 'voluntary' and, in general, the goal of a study to see about removing impediments to antenna structures  and the like. The bill seems to merely commission a study to result in reccommendations and comments invited by the HLS from the public including hams and the ARRL. Where did you see things that are negative or did I not understand something hidden between the lines? Is this seen as a threat to AM in any way? I can't see that in there. I thought this was good. Please explain so I understand why it is bad.

From some experience I can state that ham radio has played an important part in several disasters I have worked as a communications NCO  in the Texas State Guard. It's important and to discourage it from being included in HLS duty makes no sense to me.
I've 'used' hams to get traffic to and from civillian agencies and civillian agencies have 'used' me to get traffic to and from the authorities.
One example was relaying a message from FEMA to the governor of LA. It went from FEMA to MARS to a cellphone to us to a ham on a fishing boat in the gulf (we patched the cellphone to an HF set) to a marine radiotelephone to a local radio station who broadcast the message OTA. We set up that circuit and I was right there at the time. The message was an order for the governor to use his sat phone and call the prez.
Logged

Radio Candelstein - Flagship Station of the NRK Radio Network.
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2011, 08:22:24 PM »

I would like to see the FeeCee forced to give amateur radio the same protection against deed and HOA restrictions that they have willingly given to TV and satellite reception.

What I have the most misgivings about in this Bill is that the tone of the proposal seems to emphasise above all else the emcomm aspect of amateur radio.  I have observed a similar tone in releases from ARRL in recent times.  Could this lead the way to unnecessary restrictions to other aspects of amateur radio... like undesirable mode and/or bandwidth regulation, allegedly in the interest of making AR more "efficient" for emergency use? Eventual mandatory conversion to "digital" modes?

I would encourage that any letter to congress-critters clearly include these concerns, in addition to valid concerns over the ongoing proliferation of restrictions and prohibitions against erecting outdoor antennas on one's own property. 

At first glance, I wouldn't recommend blindly promoting rubber-stamp approval to the present language in the Bill.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
WB2G
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 99


« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2011, 08:26:04 PM »

Another government study,WOW they do such a good job of it.Just some more bureaucratic waste and management stupidity that will somehow translate into a loss of our freedom and rights to govern our own hobby.Read Sec.3.b.1.B carefully,do you really want to further the initiatives(whatever they may be )of the Department of Homeland Security.It may only be a crack in the door ,but it is there.Be careful what you wish for. Joe WB2G.
Logged

"I am a mortal enemy to arbitrary government and unlimited power."Benjamin Franklin
KL7OF
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2316



« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2011, 09:37:34 PM »

"Be careful what you wish for"   Thank you joe...."I agree that there is a risk if we were to surrender what is now a self determined assessment of our emergency self prepardness status and capability"....Well said Paul...
  These government agencies just love to control ....We don't need any more control...The more agencies that get involved with ham radio....the bigger the danger of more control...They dangle a carrot of less restrictions and in the end they wind up with rules we don't need or want....Anything that relates to HOMELAND SECURITY in the current political terrorist protection mentality is subject to governmental rulings that do not require any input or vote from the public...Think about it.......
Logged
Steve - K4HX
Guest
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2011, 11:02:00 PM »

Quote
Where did you see things that are negative or did I not understand something hidden between the lines?

Subject: ARLB003 New Amateur Radio Bill Introduced in Congress



Congress is involved. Does it get any more negative than that?
Logged
W3DBB
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 57


« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2011, 10:45:31 AM »

.
Logged

Doug

beautiful downtown Strodes Mills, Pennsylvania
Bill, KD0HG
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2563

304-TH - Workin' it


« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2011, 01:08:17 AM »

Figure on Congress not intervening in private contracts between buyer and seller. Mortgage lenders and mortgage insurers have a lot of clout. There are not enough voters who are radio amateurs concerned about this matter to make a difference in a Congressional election.

Oh, yes there is, considering that many congressional elections are decided by a small number of votes.The thing is...IF one moves into a covenant-controlled community, you have agreed to their rules. Don't like it? Move to the sticks or an older neighborhood without covenants. It's that simple.
Logged
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2011, 01:51:47 AM »

.The thing is...IF one moves into a covenant-controlled community, you have agreed to their rules. Don't like it? Move to the sticks or an older neighborhood without covenants. It's that simple.

The problem is that in many cases there is no real choice. All new developments tend to have restrictions, by default. It is likely a case of putting up with the restrictions in order to live within reasonable commuting distance to work, or living in the sticks where there are no restrictions, but spending 2-3 hours a day stuck in traffic.

The FeeCee already has intervened in private contracts between buyer and seller, regarding TV and satellite receiving antennas, but for some unexplained reason, they refuse to extend the same protection to amateur radio antennas.  If they have the authority to rule in the former, why would they not have the authority to rule in the latter?
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2845



WWW
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2011, 01:56:16 PM »

Because ham antennas are considered BIG and tv dishes small.  and the chips fall according to where the politics and money are.  HOA developments:  Lots of voters.  Home builders:  Lots of $$$$  Hams:  not much of either.   

Question:  Why did the FCC basically ignore the ARRL's facts and a court order regarding the Manassas VA BPL case?   Who has the MONEY.  Never fails.
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8169


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2011, 02:04:23 PM »

There are probably not to many non-hams that consider this antenna farm a thing of beauty:

Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 18 queries.