The AM Forum
April 29, 2024, 06:23:09 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Adding RF Negative feedback to a complete exciter / linear system?  (Read 19408 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4619



« Reply #25 on: January 12, 2011, 10:35:12 AM »

That is, if you can figure out the TAPR web page, and figure out which modules are available anymore, and decipher what modules you actually need to make a working radio.  Oops - that ONE module you need is now no longer available  Tongue
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #26 on: January 12, 2011, 12:22:33 PM »

TAPR is not in the HPSDR business. They do production runs when there is enough demand to make it worth doing. They try to unload all the stock as soon as possible to get their money back. Coming late requires one to wait for the next production run. A guy in germany has been dupilcating the open source hardware.  We waited 2 years for mercury to happen so join the club. I have found quality very good and everyone very helpful. There is some real software talent behind this stuff. TAPR doesn't release anything until it is right. The only design issue I have found was the temperature of the a/D on mercury. I glued a heat sink to the top of the chip and some copperflashing to the board below the A/D to sink off some heat. but I'm anal about this kind of stuff. I've had 1 relay fail but TAPR sent me a new one in a couple days.
Logged
K1JJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8893


"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz


« Reply #27 on: January 12, 2011, 12:51:19 PM »

That is, if you can figure out the TAPR web page, and figure out which modules are available anymore, and decipher what modules you actually need to make a working radio.  Oops - that ONE module you need is now no longer available  Tongue

Yep, I got the same impression at first, Johnny.  Axe Frank - I was getting frustrated thinking I may get stuck if they folded... Shocked  

But all of the boards are available to build a rig once you dig thru it. Gerd in Germany has the Penelope exciter in stock as well as Mercury receiver boards. ( with a 2 week wait)

Gerd Loch [gerd.loch@loch-leiterplatten.de]

They are planning a Hermes transceiver board which may be the reason for stopping production, I dunno.  Everything else needed is available now from TAPR. You would also need one Atlas back plane, (socket frame)  a Metis communications board,  one ref clock if you planned on two Mercurys for diversity, a Pandora enclosure box and power supplies.   Everything to build a transceiver is there except for adding a linear.  They have a 16w linear available and also a new "PennyLane" exciter with built-in 16w output coming out in a couple months I hear.

The no longer available boards mean a new one is coming out. I guess that's better than buying old technology and getting stuck cuz they need to blow thru their old inventory.

Price-wise, compared to other offerings, they are a bargain. We just need to axe lots of questions and read the details. The marketing and presentation of the site is poor, I must say.  The alternative is to pay top dollar to the Flexes of the whirl.. Wink

T
Logged

Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth  +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed.  Easily done in DSP.

Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."

There's nothing like an old dog.
KM1H
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3519



« Reply #28 on: January 12, 2011, 02:00:48 PM »

Collins S Line and Kenwood hybrids are all NFB with reportedly IMD in the -40's and not having to baby the finals at QRP.

You could also bypass the 1000D heat and IMD generators and take that 100mw into a distributed amp with output filters and wind up with a 500KHz to 150MHz capable amp.
Logged
W1VD
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 401



« Reply #29 on: January 12, 2011, 10:07:06 PM »

Have measured several Collins 32S-3 transmitters at -40 dB 3rd IMD after NFB adjustment. Assume most hybrid rigs with clean predrivers could do the same.
Logged

'Tnx Fer the Dope OM'.
K1JJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8893


"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz


« Reply #30 on: January 12, 2011, 10:38:21 PM »

Today I was sent IMD spec charts from a German who tested Penelope, the HPSDR exciter. It's only 500mW, but the specs show OVER -70db IP3 numbers, depending on power and freq. Incredible.  He also showed me a 500 mW to 150w SS CCI amplifier combo that ran class A  amplifying Penny.  It was showing well over -50db 3rd on the charts.

Help me - I'm falling into the SDR darkside abyss! (Theres no escape)

T
Logged

Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth  +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed.  Easily done in DSP.

Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."

There's nothing like an old dog.
Steve - K4HX
Guest
« Reply #31 on: January 12, 2011, 10:39:26 PM »

As Carl noted, I think some of the Kenwoods (TS-820/830) were in this range for IMD too. Seems like we've taken a big step backwards. Most recent transceivers are in the low 30s! Add in synth noise and it's a good thing there are less hams on the are these days.


Have measured several Collins 32S-3 transmitters at -40 dB 3rd IMD after NFB adjustment. Assume most hybrid rigs with clean predrivers could do the same.
Logged
K1JJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8893


"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz


« Reply #32 on: January 12, 2011, 10:47:44 PM »

Quote
Most recent transceivers are in the low 30s! Add in synth noise and it's a good thing there are less hams on the are these days.

Yeah, and add in a big QRO amplifier and the effective whiner QRM IMD drops down into the abominable low -20's... Shocked
Logged

Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth  +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed.  Easily done in DSP.

Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."

There's nothing like an old dog.
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #33 on: January 13, 2011, 10:05:03 AM »

We don't need no stinking synthesizers or DDS crap generators.
It is a disease. But Tom now your going to need a good Tempest computer.
Good thing the antennas are out in the field.
Logged
K1JJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8893


"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz


« Reply #34 on: January 13, 2011, 10:50:24 AM »

We don't need no stinking synthesizers or DDS crap generators.
It is a disease. But Tom now your going to need a good Tempest computer.
Good thing the antennas are out in the field.


A Tempest computer?  Is that like a Lemans computer - or is a GTO computer better?   

I'm stuck with a 5 year old, 2-core 2.5ghz machine that better lick it and like it.

T
Logged

Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth  +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed.  Easily done in DSP.

Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."

There's nothing like an old dog.
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #35 on: January 13, 2011, 10:58:09 AM »

A Tempest is the sleeper machine. Same frame as a GTO and looks like a family car.....
Logged
K1JJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8893


"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz


« Reply #36 on: January 13, 2011, 11:28:35 AM »

http://www.cryptek.com/products/emanation_security_products/tempest_desktop_computers/emcon_tempest_level_2_pc

I see they DO exist. Are these the disco duck high-end dreamboats of the SDR guys?  Why are they only Duo-core?   Chuck tells me he bought a quad-core for his Flex 5K.    I don't wanna be left in the disco-dust here... Grin

T
Logged

Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth  +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed.  Easily done in DSP.

Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."

There's nothing like an old dog.
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #37 on: January 13, 2011, 01:27:58 PM »

RF getting into the computer can be an issue. That was my only point.
Tempest machines had extra shielding, they didn't radiate so spys couldn't hear your bits.
I lock my machine up every once in a while. I thought I had it licked but it is back with the 3 KAZ feedlines coming into the shack. Time for a bead job and a better cable layout. Now they JS dangle from the window.
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #38 on: January 13, 2011, 01:30:39 PM »

Tom, I'm running a Dell precision 650 dual dual core 2.4 GHz. I picked it up at the Pratt surplus store for under $200. I'm usually running under 10% horse power. I bet the new Ethrnet interface will be even better.
Logged
KM1H
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3519



« Reply #39 on: January 13, 2011, 01:59:09 PM »

Back in days of old when hams were bold I had Tempest clearance at Sanders and then picked up at Wang. Amazing what the bad guys could hear across the street from a guarded secure building back then. The spook outfit gave a demo at Sanders and at Wang and also tested everything they bought from us on site.

Steve, a TS-830, which is what I uses to test amps and drive a HB xvtr for those 6M conversions will do -42dB with just a standard tune for max power tuneup. Tweak a bit and you can pick up 2-3 more. Its somewhere south of -55 out of the 10mw xvtr port and no phase noise to speak of. Im using 3 more to drive transverters in the shack for those reasons.....and people claim its my location that hears so well Grin A good hilltop and a noisy radio sucks no matter how you look at it and drives others bonkers on TX when the band noise floor is at/below galatic noise.
Logged
Steve - K4HX
Guest
« Reply #40 on: January 13, 2011, 04:40:29 PM »

Those are some impressive numbers Carl.
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #41 on: January 16, 2011, 09:33:20 PM »

Carl, I remember testing at Sanders once and old Bob Samson talking about tempest testing. He couldn't let us in the test area though.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.822 seconds with 18 queries.