WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« on: July 29, 2010, 11:25:10 AM » |
|
I'm getting ready to do some RX antenna testing and have a question. I wonder if any of you K9AY users ever tried to terminate the unselected loop to a resistive load? I plan to start with 1 K9AY loop on one side of the yard with a short beverage on the other
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2010, 11:27:21 AM » |
|
I'm not completely sure what you mean but I'll say no. Could you tell us more? I'm getting ready to do some RX antenna testing and have a question. I wonder if any of you K9AY users ever tried to terminate the unselected loop to a resistive load? I plan to start with 1 K9AY loop on one side of the yard with a short beverage on the other
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2010, 11:56:25 AM » |
|
Since the unselected loop is 90 degrees off the selected loop why not turn signals coming in off the sides into heat?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2010, 12:05:57 PM » |
|
What good would that do?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2010, 12:11:01 PM » |
|
Limit coupling to the loop in use. I might try to simulate it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2010, 12:27:51 PM » |
|
Interesting. I wonder what the interaction between the two is? Limit coupling to the loop in use. I might try to simulate it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member
Offline
Posts: 10057
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 29, 2010, 12:34:00 PM » |
|
I ran into K9AY at Dayton this spring. He was headed to a forum or something and didn't have a lot of time to chit-chat, but he did answer a couple of questions about the loop. He said to e-mail him and he would be glad to answer any other questions in detail.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Don, K4KYV AMI#5 Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM... Never got off AM in the first place.- - - This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout. http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
|
|
|
W1VD
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 401
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 29, 2010, 02:02:31 PM » |
|
Since the loops are not resonant and mounted at 90 degree angles it doesn't seem there would be much coupling. If it were an issue it would probably show up in modeling.
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Tnx Fer the Dope OM'.
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 29, 2010, 02:29:31 PM » |
|
Agree but would it suck down the field strength with the loop terminated to a load converting to heat. I bet it will also require a change to the selected loop load value.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 29, 2010, 02:43:50 PM » |
|
I don't think the loop will act as a dummy load. However, it would be interesting to see what would happen if you fed and terminated both loops and played some phasing games. Agree but would it suck down the field strength with the loop terminated to a load converting to heat. I bet it will also require a change to the selected loop load value.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 29, 2010, 03:01:02 PM » |
|
I have played these games near field so wonder if it works with antennas. I've effected emissions of cables by adding ground wires in the bundle.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
K1JJ
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 8893
"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 29, 2010, 03:47:54 PM » |
|
I don't think the loop will act as a dummy load. Dummies are people too....
|
|
|
Logged
|
Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed. Easily done in DSP.
Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."
There's nothing like an old dog.
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 29, 2010, 04:01:33 PM » |
|
They sure are. I don't think the loop will act as a dummy load. Dummies are people too....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 5055
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 29, 2010, 07:31:03 PM » |
|
A lesson I learned from my K9AY is to keep it FAR AWAY from the transmitting antenna. The TX RF never hurt the pre-amp for the loop but it fried the usual coil in my R390A. I forget the circuit deignation but it is the first coil used on the broadcast to 2mc in the RF deck.
I have since installed an I.C.E. RF limiter on the R390A and an early Spring thunder storm wiped that out. So my 390A has been saved.
Slight off-topic Fred
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fred KC4MOP
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2010, 07:44:43 AM » |
|
And you'll want separation to avoid pattern distortion and/or noise reradiated from the TX antenna.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KM1H
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 3519
|
|
« Reply #15 on: August 01, 2010, 01:29:18 PM » |
|
I tried the AY loop years ago and the 2 turn shielded, remotely tuned, and rotatable loop beat it every time. And of course it didnt come close to a full size Beverage.
Get some of those brass Slinkys and stretch 4-5 out over 150-200'. Ive had one up to the NE that equals a 1200' for SNR but the gain (loss really) is a bit more wih the Slinky. Use a carbon pot to determine the best F/B off a high end BC station during the day then use a fixed 2W; I found 1200 Ohms works best but Im on mostly rock covered by some sand and pine needles, the ground rod goes in at a very shallow angle.
Carl
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2010, 10:55:53 PM » |
|
I spent the past week playing with different KAZ configurations compared to a 160 foot beverage. The beverage was 160 feet long pointing west and the KAZ was set up to go east. The larger I made the KAZ the lower frequency the pattern flipped. I had a 85 foot base KAZ 30 feet tall pick up WWVH on 10 and 15 MHz better than the beverage. This was off the load end. I didn't try the K9AY because HUZ told me his didn't work well on 40 meters. My last configuration of the KAZ was 50 foot base and 30 feet at the apex. On 40 meters is was no better than the beverage in either direction yet worked well below about 5 MHz. My first KAZ worked best on 40M since it was the smallest. I need to go smaller yet. The noise floor is not a problem so can get away without an amp. My coax run was too short to go smaller. Next trip I will bring more feed line so I don't have to come in the kitchen window and block the XYL's area.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sndtubes
Guest
|
|
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2010, 03:28:35 AM » |
|
I really like my K9AY but I'm starting to wonder if it's working just right.....
If I'm receiving a signal from the EAST, when I switch between NE and SE, there isn't much difference in signal strength. However, if I switch to either NW or SW, then there is a pretty large (12 to 18 dB) of difference. Does this sound right or might I have a problem with my K9AY?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 5055
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2010, 04:59:17 AM » |
|
I would get the same results with my 9AY. It seems sometimes it does magic and sometimes no difference. I'm not an official knowledgebase on the 9AY loop. I have experienced the same thing. Maybe some other responses. I'm not sure even a HB rotateable loop would give same results. Any predictability to traditional beverages??Something about the RX sig coming from sky wave or ground waves..................dunno
Fred
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fred KC4MOP
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2010, 07:58:00 AM » |
|
I'm only using 1 loop so far but notice signals off the side stronger as you increase frequency. I read the EWE pattern also shifts as you increase frequency. I think the null is a bigger deal than gain in the k9ay
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 13, 2010, 06:07:03 PM » |
|
Seems correct to me. The front lobe is very broad so there is overlap between the different directions. But the null on the back side of the pattern can be pretty substantial. I really like my K9AY but I'm starting to wonder if it's working just right.....
If I'm receiving a signal from the EAST, when I switch between NE and SE, there isn't much difference in signal strength. However, if I switch to either NW or SW, then there is a pretty large (12 to 18 dB) of difference. Does this sound right or might I have a problem with my K9AY?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 15, 2010, 09:33:53 PM » |
|
Dragged some more coax to GFZ south and flipped the KAZ to the west. Also reduced the sice to about 20 feet on a side. I would say 90% of the time WWVH (5, 10, 15 MHz) came in better on the KAZ than the beverage. MW band the BEV always won. They were about even off the back side to the east. The KAZ was also quieter. Next time I will make the KAZ a lot bigger and see what happens. I also tried a single K9AY loop and found it not very directive on 40 meters compared to the beverage.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 16, 2010, 03:27:11 PM » |
|
Most any terminated loop will lose directivity when its length approaches 0.25 WL at the operating frequency.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11152
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 16, 2010, 09:11:40 PM » |
|
HUZ I think it loses directivity when the two vertical wires approach .25 WL. Also the pattern flips when it gets a lot longer. I want to play with a larger one some more to see how it plays against the beverage to the west. Two weeks ago I didn't have enough coax with me to get them both in the same direction.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 16, 2010, 09:18:45 PM » |
|
It's the circumference. If it's around 0.25 WL the directivity is gone. Once the loop is larger than this, the E and H-fields cannot be balanced and subtracted. Bye-bye directivity.
Here's an audio clip of my K9AY in action on 1590 kHz.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|