The AM Forum
May 03, 2024, 03:56:52 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Shared feedline for OCF antennas...  (Read 2360 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
K1ZJH
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 299


« on: June 26, 2010, 04:32:13 PM »

I know you can easily employ multiple dipoles on a single feedline, and the lowest impedance dipole will be the one that does the work.

Does the same hold true for paralleling two OCF antennas, on a common feedpoint?  Case in point would be two MFJ OCFs (freebies, don't go there  Grin) one is the 80/40 meter model, the other covers 40 through 6 meters.

Pete
Logged
K1ZJH
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 299


« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2010, 09:45:36 AM »

So far 58 readers got a good chuckle out of this question  Grin
Logged
WD5JKO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1997


WD5JKO


« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2010, 09:04:41 AM »

So far 58 readers got a good chuckle out of this question  Grin

I take it this is an April fools question?  Cheesy

I use my OCF Windom (single wire 35' feed) 160-10m where the inv V top is a half wave on 80m. I get a < 2:1 swr feedpoint on 160 (1960), 80 (3.88), 40 (~ 7100) without a tuner. I do use an 'L' network however to make the feedline to the shack flat. Considering it is up in a large Oak tree, I think it does a pretty fair job...for what it is.

Isn't the point of OCF such that you can operate on all harmonically related frequencies above the fundamental whereas with a 1/2 wave dipole you only get odd harmonic frequencies (coax feed)? You can also run it as I do at 1/2 the fundamental as it acts like a top loaded vertical.

Jim
WD5JKO
Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2010, 09:26:34 AM »

Get some modeling software and try it. I would think there would be much more interaction with the OCFs than dipoles.
Logged
K1ZJH
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 299


« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2010, 02:57:21 PM »

So far 58 readers got a good chuckle out of this question  Grin

I take it this is an April fools question?  Cheesy
 

Isn't the point of OCF such that you can operate on all harmonically related frequencies above the fundamental whereas with a 1/2 wave dipole you only get odd harmonic frequencies (coax feed)? You can also run it as I do at 1/2 the fundamental as it acts like a top loaded vertical.

Jim
WD5JKO

Hi Jim

Long story. One OCF is "optimized" for only 80 and 40 meters, the second
OCF is "optimized" for 40, 20, 10 and 6 meters. A friend designed them
and had offered to give me a pair to try out; all assembled, ready to put
up, feedline and baluns included.  His contention is that many
designs give up optimum performance when trying for as many bands as
possible coverage.  I was just musing if I could get away with one feedline
and balun; I guess modeling would be the way to go.

My "real"  antenna will be a 100 foot dipole fed with homemade 6" open
wire line. Problem is I am running out trees and pulleys on the tower Smiley

Pete
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 19 queries.