The AM Forum
April 28, 2024, 09:06:27 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Competition for the Flex?  (Read 14199 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #25 on: February 03, 2010, 08:30:55 PM »

Smug is knowing a $15 soft rock works as well as a $2800 Flex.
I will never want to replace of a pair of nice knobs with anything
Logged
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #26 on: February 03, 2010, 08:37:57 PM »

I will never want to replace of a pair of nice knobs with anything


And there ya go talking about Gravity Storage Units again.

Logged
W3RSW
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3308


Rick & "Roosevelt"


« Reply #27 on: February 03, 2010, 09:36:23 PM »

Oh, I get it!

Took me long enough. Cool

the more mature ones tend to displace time-space domain in the downward vector.
Logged

RICK  *W3RSW*
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #28 on: February 03, 2010, 09:44:55 PM »

could this be Newton's fourth law of hot bodies?
Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #29 on: February 03, 2010, 09:48:22 PM »

Quote
I don't see why they would want to. You want to tailor your advertising for the broadest appeal in the ham population. Gives you a bigger bang for the buck.

Or you go for a smaller market so you can charge more (think upscale cars) or some other niche (to avoid directly competing with the big boyz). Usually the niches only last for so long once the big boys catch on.
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #30 on: February 03, 2010, 10:16:47 PM »

Steve,
When I saw the FTDX5000 on the bench at the ARRL the first thing I asked for was the manual to see if SDR made its way into a rice box. I was surprised to find it attached to the third IF. First 40.455 second 455 just like a mil rig of the '80s.
I think they priced it by the number of knobs and buttons.
So it appears the rice boxes are a solid generation behind flex. It is a large radio with more controls than Flash Gordon's space ship.
Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #31 on: February 03, 2010, 10:37:23 PM »

And it's smaller than the FTDX9000.
Logged
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2845



WWW
« Reply #32 on: February 03, 2010, 11:23:16 PM »

I doubt it!
Nothing has knobs on it anymore but ham radio stuff.
They will go to touch screens and so on, like all the new cell phones, etc.

yeah, then after that they will go out of business.  Too many buzzards like me still around who won't buy a rig with nothing but a touch screen.

To get a really good display of the spectrum, which is a very useful tool, it would be very hard to go back to being blind, you need a screen, a nice hi res 22 inch monitor is stunning with the sdr radios.
Some little crap screen is almost useless, and not having one is unthinkable after using any sdr.

Really.  I've used a flex radio and been quite happy to go back to my old technology, "being blind" as you put it.  Why?  Two reasons:  1.  My stuff works every time.  No surprises.  I won't name names but I know a few Flex owners who can't say that.  2.  When I'm in a QSO I want to only do one thing--listen to what the other op is saying.   All that stuff on the screen of a Flex Radio is just a distraction to me.   I find it a nuisance.

I have no problem at all with the flex 5000 performance, even if its old tech.
Its good enough to be 3rd on the Sherwood list which is not bad from a raw performance standpoint, plus all the fantastic features none of the other radios on the list even have...


I don't know from lists.  But all these rx spec rankings mean nothing to me.  Usually a hot rx means that someone pw calling me will be barely audible instead of in the noise which is what I prefer.  As a social operator I just want a ragchew and I don't care if the other ham is in Indiana or India as long as he is armchair copy.  Grin

Rob
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
ei9ju
Guest
« Reply #33 on: February 04, 2010, 02:20:13 PM »

I took my SDR receiver to the club to show how good it performed, a total waste of time as the mouse was faulty, the bee's knees of SDR more or less rendered useless for want of a mouse-click  Roll Eyes
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 19 queries.