The AM Forum
April 27, 2024, 01:51:10 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: AM and FM using one carrier  (Read 3932 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kb3ouk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1640

The Voice of Fulton County


« on: July 19, 2009, 12:46:47 PM »

I don't know how well this would work or if there may have been someone who has tried it before, but would it be possible to send an AM signal and an FM signal on a single carrier, but have two different conversations transmitted? So one conversation would be on FM and the other would be on AM. I thought this over for a while and the way I think it could be done is to modulate an exciter with FM, then use that to drive a plate modulated amplifier (it wouldn't have to be plate modulated, another method of modulation could work). On receive, the FM should come through clearly, since the receiver's limiter would take care of the amplitude variations, but my question is, what would happen to the AM on receive? If the receiver is tuned right on the carrier, the FM audio shouldn't be detected, unless the receiver was tuned to the side of the carrier, then the receiver would pick up the FM audio through slope detection.
Shelby KB3OUK
Logged

Clarke's Second Law: The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is by venturing a little past them into the impossible
Ed-VA3ES
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 593



« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2009, 02:31:44 PM »

Build an "SBE".   Tongue
http://amfone.net/index.php?ind=media&op=file_view&iden=226
Quote
I switched over to FM mode and was able to copy him perfectly!
Logged

"There ain't a slaw-bukit inna worl, that kin jam me!!"
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4619



« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2009, 03:23:18 PM »

The AM receiver would slope detect the FM.  And the FM receiver, due to imperfect limiting would probably also detect some of the AM.
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8315



WWW
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2009, 03:59:18 PM »

If you want to send 2 streams of intelligence, ISB with carrier might be one way.
Logged

Radio Candelstein - Flagship Station of the NRK Radio Network.
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2009, 06:42:24 PM »

Actually, some forms of AM  stereo work that way.  L + R was used to amplitude  modulate the carrier normal fashion.  L-R was used to phase modulate the carrier.  Phase modulation is very closely related to FM.

SSB can be thought of as a combination of AM and phase modulation.  The AM component is seen in on an oscilloscope in the envelope pattern of the SSB signal.  The PM component can de derived by hard limiting the signal to remove all the AM component.  There were some experimental systems back in the early 50's that tried to generate SSB just that way.  The PM component was used to drive a class-C final and the AM component was fed into the modulator.  The idea was to generate SSB using a minimally modified AM transmitter.

It reportedly met with some success.  I'm not sure how they maintained carrier suppression during long pauses in the audio.  Perhaps they didn't worry about suppressing the carrier.

Then there is the so-called compatible SSB that was tried with AM broadcasting.  It supposedly was copyable with perfect fidelity using a normal envelope detector.  I believe WOR, KDKA and WBZ tried some experiments with it.  It was mainly tried for reducing interference when two major stations would mutually interfere with each other, by shifting all of the signal to one side of the carrier.  It was a complex combination of phase modulating the carrier and simultaneously pre-distorting the AM modulation.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
kb3ouk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1640

The Voice of Fulton County


« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2009, 07:01:49 PM »

I was wondering about that today. I figured that transmitting the signal would be easy, but receiving it would be where the problems are. Running the same signal through it would be easy, but trying to feed different signals through would be difficult. It might be possible if the level of modulation on both the AM and FM were very low, then the frequency and amplitude variations would be as large. That might reduce the chance of one picking up the other.
Logged

Clarke's Second Law: The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is by venturing a little past them into the impossible
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2009, 07:09:56 PM »


SSB can be thought of as a combination of AM and phase modulation.  The AM component is seen in on an oscilloscope in the envelope pattern of the SSB signal.  The PM component can de derived by hard limiting the signal to remove all the AM component.  There were some experimental systems back in the early 50's that tried to generate SSB just that way.  The PM component was used to drive a class-C final and the AM component was fed into the modulator.  The idea was to generate SSB using a minimally modified AM transmitter.

Here is an article (patent information) on the subject:

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4593410.html
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 18 queries.