The AM Forum
May 05, 2024, 11:09:53 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: My idea for a new tactic on the IARU mess  (Read 22493 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kf6pqt
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 530


« on: December 08, 2007, 12:16:58 PM »

So, the cronies in Newington keep replying "No, no, you ignoramus, it doesn't mean we are going to regulate by bandwidth, blah, blah, technicality, technicality, blah blah, voluntary, blah, blah..."

So instead of playing the cat and mouse, we should just deliver the blow. I'm thinking of writing an email like this, and I think everyone else should too:

"Lets cut the crap, if any League action prevents me from operating the AM mode, I will never renew my membership again. Being just under 34 years of age, and with a family history showing I may very likely live to age 95, that will be a loss of revenue to the League of $2440 over my lifetime, and that is only at 2008 membership rates. I'm certain I would not be alone in my actions."

Now, ya think if they got 5000 emails like this, and saw over 12 mil in future revenue instantly go poof, they might change course?

Maybe also add a sentence and cc sales@vertexstandard.com, icomusa.com, kenwoodusa.com, "And you can be damn sure I'll never buy another new ricebox for the rest of my days, either!"

Think this would work better? Wink

-Jason kf6pqt


PS- maybe also add "And I'll SURE as hell not buy another MFJ product either!"
Logged

W6IEE, formerly KF6PQT
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8080


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2007, 01:03:19 PM »

"Lets cut the crap, if any League action prevents me from operating the AM mode, I will never renew my membership again. Being just under 34 years of age, and with a family history showing I may very likely live to age 95, that will be a loss of revenue to the League of $2440 over my lifetime, and that is only at 2008 membership rates. I'm certain I would not be alone in my actions."

Now, ya think if they got 5000 emails like this, and saw over 12 mil in future revenue instantly go poof, they might change course?

Maybe also add a sentence and cc sales@vertexstandard.com, icomusa.com, kenwoodusa.com, "And you can be damn sure I'll never buy another new ricebox for the rest of my days, either!"

Think this would work better? Wink

-Jason kf6pqt
PS- maybe also add "And I'll SURE as hell not buy another MFJ product either!"

"$2440 over my lifetime" - Probably less then a 1 page ad in QST for 1 month.
Threats generally are always counterproductive and only results in a short-term high to the deliverer.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
W4EWH
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 825



« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2007, 02:52:54 PM »

... that will be a loss of revenue to the League of $2440 over my lifetime, and that is only at 2008 membership rates.

Actually, you'd do better to quote the future value of the annuity, which will be substantially higher.

Bill
Logged

Life's too short for plastic radios.  Wallow in the hollow! - KD1SH
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2007, 03:05:59 PM »

Money makes the world go 'round, as they say.

As Pete points out, the Sales and Marketing dollars are much more significant than any one member's dollars, a fact of business life.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2007, 03:20:38 PM »

Last week I compared a back issue of World Radio's list of advertisers to the Advertisers List in QST.  It was interesting to see the businesses that choose to advertise in WR rather than in QST.

Going with Pete's comments, perhaps it is a better action rather than to cancel one's membership (note: NOT a subscription) to ARRL, to do diligence in buying a new ham product, do your homework and find and buy if you can, a similar product from a vendor who DOES NOT ADVERTISE in QST.  Then write the other vendor in QST and tell him that you did not buy from him because he advertises in QST.  I know this is somewhat of a long shot, but the leveraging of your xxx. dollars of influence is much more effective this way.  Your whole lifetime membership in ARRL is but one ad in QST.

QST's advertisers have much more influence with the League than you do.  Go with it.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2007, 03:34:30 PM »

Thanks Jason and Pete.

I believe this is called brainstorming.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2007, 03:35:29 PM »

I believe this is called boycotting also.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2007, 03:47:11 PM »

True enough, but as memberships drop, so do readers/subscribers of QST. This is turn reduces the amount the ARRL can charge for advertising. It will have an impact of enough people do it.


Money makes the world go 'round, as they say.

As Pete points out, the Sales and Marketing dollars are much more significant than any one member's dollars, a fact of business life.
Logged
WA3VJB
Guest
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2007, 03:49:32 PM »

Jason I have to agree, they really don't give a szht about people who quit paying dues, since they've obviously been willing to watch their enrolled share of licensees slip to about 20-25%.

But this thread, with your idea and then bringing in the manufacturers,  prompted this version of an economic lever --

How about making approaches to corporate executives at the Big Three and politely lay it out how the ARRL is causing problems rather than addressing any real issue at hand.

A few questions now coming from Kenwood, Icom and Yaesu to the League's business office might be a real eye-opener.

It would take a tight synopsis, proposed solution, and sincere frustration at the League's lack of receptiveness.
Logged
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2007, 04:07:34 PM »

Drop your membership AND buy elsewhere.  You can do both buy-golly.

I do love my MFJ-259B, that product is a winner.

MFJ does advertise in WR, at least the issue I looked at.  I don't think they advertise in ER though.

Martin is a shrewd dude.  And now he has the volume.  He must get quite a discount on ad space from QST now.

If you could buy from Ten-Tec or Elecraft you are buying American.  You would not be buying from the East-Coast-of-Japan-sound boys.

Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
KF1Z
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1796


Are FETs supposed to glow like that?


« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2007, 04:08:59 PM »

Yes, actually when you think about it....

Where would the Big-Three's advertising dollars be better spent anyway,,,,

QST, or the WWW.....

It's not like they'd be losing a big market audience......

but the ARRL would lose big!

Logged

kb3ouk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1636

The Voice of Fulton County


« Reply #11 on: December 08, 2007, 04:33:51 PM »

My advice to the ARRL would be to take their regulation by bandwidth and stuff it. We don't need this load of bull. It's not like they're going to cut off part of the bands, they're just making more room for the slopbuckets and everyone else. AM'ers have been using various frequencies for years and now they're stuffing this down our throats. The whole thing's a mess. But I agree with Jason, they might change their minds after they see a couple million dollars go poof because of this mess. AM will always be a part of amateur radio.
Logged

Clarke's Second Law: The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is by venturing a little past them into the impossible
ka3zlr
Guest
« Reply #12 on: December 08, 2007, 05:19:14 PM »

Well,..one thing is for sure they got nobody to thank but themselves, this is what happens when you exclude the interested from the interest.

Wow i wouldn't want to be on that end of the stick...
Logged
kf6pqt
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 530


« Reply #13 on: December 08, 2007, 05:22:58 PM »

Yeah, I just threw it out as a half-awake-drinking-coffee idea... Kind of like, "Ok, well you want us to trust you, we will, but there will be HUGE monetary consequences if you betray our trust." Hmm, that statement doesnt even sit well.

They are a corporation, we have to treat them like one.

And yeah, the MFJ angle would be a tough one for me too, some of there stuff is pretty darn cool. I just today made my first ever 10 meter qso during this weekend's 10m corntest on one of their little qrp slopbucket radios that I got used a while back.

Hey, no one was on 29.0 and 29.01 AM!!   Wink I need to order xtals for my 10m Stancor AM tx.

Anyway, we'd have to get a lot of people behind this "carrot and stick" initiative, if the idea doesn't take off like wildfire here, it definitely won't elsewhere. I'm just trying to think of a better way to be productive than just saying "Sh!%, they're screwing us, damn them," and doing a bunch of hand-wringing. I've written my emails, and they get answered by Harrison saying "no, no, thats not what we're trying to do, besides, its voluntary!"

They're gonna do whatever they want, due to their perceived mandate from their membership. Obviously we can't have a rational discussion with them, as they perceive us as "ignorant," but if we can make them scared for their revenue, perhaps they'll back off and chill. They need to know how tenuous that flimsy mandate really is.

We can't really hope for them to crash and burn, as they do some good for Ham Radio. Another group has to come in to existence first, then ARRL can go fish.

Do you think 'Ol Wayne Green could have gotten farther creating a competitor for the ARRL if he would have had the amazing tool called "The Internet" at his disposal?

Creating an "alternative" is such a crazy idea, that its a good one. Some crazy bastard needs to do it.

Don't look at me, I don't have the starting capital!  I'd gladly join, though.

Logged

W6IEE, formerly KF6PQT
kb3ouk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1636

The Voice of Fulton County


« Reply #14 on: December 08, 2007, 07:12:16 PM »

your first statement really shows the truth of the situation
Logged

Clarke's Second Law: The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is by venturing a little past them into the impossible
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4611



« Reply #15 on: December 10, 2007, 09:11:13 AM »

As with dealing with HOAs or any other petty dictatorship, the key to REALLY influencing the organization is to run for office and parlay that into a leadership position on the Board, etc.

I remember when some of the College Republicans (some of whom were members of the U of MN Radio CLub) took over the Minnesota Public Interest Research Group board.   Much fun was had by all  Grin

Anyway, running for office with the ARRL means you need to be a member.  And even then they may find a reason to disqualify you for a "potential future conflict of interest" or something.
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2007, 03:12:44 PM »

From a post of mine above, ..."do diligence in buying a new ham product, do your homework and find and buy if you can, a similar product from a vendor who DOES NOT ADVERTISE in QST.  Then write the other vendor in QST and tell him that you did not buy from him because he advertises in QST.  I know this is somewhat of a long shot, but the leveraging of your xxx. dollars of influence is much more effective this way.  Your whole lifetime membership in ARRL is but one ad in QST.

QST's advertisers have much more influence with the League than you do.  Go with it."

(Perhaps some of these companies ping-pong from magazine to magazine, advertising only periodically.)

Companies That Do Not Advertise In QST    Rev. 1  December 11, 2007

Inspecting the December 2006 issue of WorldRadio vs. Dec. 2007 QST:

American Morse Equipment
Ardco Electronics
Better RF Company
Caps Unlimited
Casual Dxpedition
Cliff Dweller Products
ComTek Systems
Command Productions
Communication Products Limited
Courage Handi-Ham System
CW Touch Keyer
dBj Radio & Electronics
DC Ace, Inc.
Elk Antennas
Engineering Systems, Inc.
EPCOM
EZ Hang
Hamshack.biz
Hamstuff by W7NN
Inkjet Southwest
J Poles
K-Y Filter Co.
K1CRA Radio Store
Kanga USA
Lakeview
Leo Lehner/Battery Booster
Jean Lestrale
James E. Mackey
The Mast Company
Midland Technologies
N2VZ Enterprises
Nemal Electronics
Paddlette Company
Penny’s Stitch n’ Print
Performance HF, Inc.
QCWA
R.F. Connection
RF Parts
Rig Technologies
Sign Man of Baton Rouge
Smiley Antenna Co.
Southwest Michigan Specialty Services
Success Easy/Alternative Arts
Tashjian Towers Corp.
TechNote Time
Unified Microsystems
Universal Electronics
Vibroplex Co.
VIS Amateur Supply
Webster Communications, Inc.
Wilderness Radio
The Wireman, Inc./Clear Signal Products
WorldRadio (of course)
- - - - - -
September 2007 Electric Radio vs. December 2007 QST
(ER desires only vintage radio related vendors)

CleanRF Technologies
Dave Curry Longwave Products
Electric Radio Store/Zim Electronics Inrush Current Limiters
Electronic Specialty Products
EZ Hang
Heil Sound
Mil-Spec Communications
Vintage Manuals Inc.
West Tech Services
 - - - - - -

M3 Electronix Inc.
An interesting product I learned of recently is a digital LCRZ meter kit by a company called M3 Electronix Inc.  (Maybe someone here on the AM Forum mentioned it.)
Has 0.2 % accuracy, $175 for the basic kit.  This is much better than the usual digital LCR meter.  I don’t have one nor do I know the owner of the business.
They have a number of products.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2007, 03:35:31 PM »

If you find a ham product to buy that is not advertised in QST, that otherwise has suitable vendors advertising in QST with comparable products, drop the QST vendors all a line.  State whether you spotted your choice on the Internet or if in another magazine - mention which one.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8080


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2007, 05:54:38 PM »

Not sure what QST advertisers list for December 2007 you're looking at but:
Universal Radio is there
Tashjian Towers is there
Electric Radio is there

There might even be more.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #19 on: December 12, 2007, 10:26:54 AM »

We’re looking at the same QST Advertiser’s List Pete, unless Dave Sumner is sending the Alarmists a special custom issue, HI. 

My WorldRadio worksheet has the companies correctly marked except for Tashjian, I made a clerical error there, thanks, so do not buy from Tashjian Towers.  I have removed them from my list, my only revision.

The Universal Radio of Ohio who advertises in QST is a different company from Universal Electronics of North Carolina (in WorldRadio) – known for Coax-Seal and coaxseal.com.

Electric Radio does advertise in QST and is therefore not on the "Companies That Do Not Advertise In QST" vendors list but in it’s specific case, it is an alternative ham radio magazine as is WorldRadio.
Updated list:

Companies That Do Not Advertise In QST   Rev. 2  Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Inspecting the December 2006 issue of WorldRadio vs. Dec. 2007 QST:

American Morse Equipment
Ardco Electronics
Better RF Company
Caps Unlimited
Casual Dxpedition
Cliff Dweller Products
ComTek Systems
Command Productions
Communication Products Limited
Courage Handi-Ham System
CW Touch Keyer
dBj Radio & Electronics
DC Ace, Inc.
Elk Antennas
Engineering Systems, Inc.
EPCOM
EZ Hang
Hamshack.biz
Hamstuff by W7NN
Inkjet Southwest
J Poles
K-Y Filter Co.
K1CRA Radio Store
Kanga USA
Lakeview
Leo Lehner/Battery Booster
Jean Lestrale
James E. Mackey
The Mast Company
Midland Technologies
N2VZ Enterprises
Nemal Electronics
Paddlette Company
Penny’s Stitch n’ Print
Performance HF, Inc.
QCWA
R.F. Connection
RF Parts
Rig Technologies
Sign Man of Baton Rouge
Smiley Antenna Co.
Southwest Michigan Specialty Services
Success Easy/Alternative Arts
TechNote Time
Unified Microsystems
Universal Electronics
Vibroplex Co.
VIS Amateur Supply
Webster Communications, Inc.
Wilderness Radio
The Wireman, Inc./Clear Signal Products
WorldRadio (of course)
- - - - - -
September 2007 Electric Radio vs. December 2007 QST
(ER desires only vintage radio related vendors)

CleanRF Technologies
Dave Curry Longwave Products
Electric Radio Store/Zim Electronics Inrush Current Limiters
Electronic Specialty Products
EZ Hang
Heil Sound
Mil-Spec Communications
Vintage Manuals Inc.
West Tech Services
 - - - - - -
M3 Electronix Inc.
An interesting product I learned of recently is a digital LCRZ meter kit by a company called M3 Electronix Inc.  (Maybe someone here on the AM Forum mentioned it.)
Has 0.2 % accuracy, $175 for the basic kit.  This is much better than the usual digital LCR meter.  I don’t have one nor do I know the owner of the business.

* 12/16 - I learned of M3 as a result of a review of their frequency counter in the December 2007 issue of QST!
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #20 on: December 12, 2007, 11:01:50 AM »

Perhaps I will compare a recent issue of CQ to December QST in the near future.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8080


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #21 on: December 12, 2007, 01:46:10 PM »

My error too on "Universal" xx.
And manufacturers do ping-pong between the various mags.
May 2007 QST does show:
BetterRF Co.
EZ Hang
Kanga US
Lakeview

Plus a number of companies you show are small enterprises where advertising in QST is cost prohibitive.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10037



« Reply #22 on: December 12, 2007, 06:14:00 PM »

Perhaps I will compare a recent issue of CQ to December QST in the near future.

Now they're both essentially newbie/contesting/appliance op rags.  73 had pretty much gone that same route too, before it went belly-up.  Ham Radio didn't survive after Jim Fisk Died. Fisk, BTW, as pro-technical as he was, was decidedly biased against AM.  Just read some of his editorials in past issues, and observe the rarity of AM-oriented technical articles.  For a while, HR also published a second magazine, pretty much of the same genre as the present-day QST and CQ and aimed primarily at newbies, called Ham Radio Horizons.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #23 on: December 12, 2007, 06:52:59 PM »

Companies That Advertised in CQ Magazine, September 2007 And Did Not Advertise In QST January 2008.      Rev. 1  Wednesday, December 12, 2007

A & A Engineering
Amateur Television Quarterly
Amidon Associates
Astron Corporation
Atomic Time, Inc.
bhi Ltd.
Burghardt Amateur Center
Butternut Antennas
CQ Books
CheapHam.com
Command Productions
Communication Concepts, Inc.
Diamond Antenna
FingerDimple.com
Green Heron Engineering LLC
Ham4Less.com
Ham Station
KJI Electronics, Inc.
Kanga USA
Kent USA
Morse Express
Navigator Interface
Nemal Electronics International, Inc.
New Communications Solutions, LLC
OLYMPIX
Penny’s Stitch n’ Print
PowerPort
QCWA
R.F. Connection
RF Parts Company
RSGB
RT Systems
RadioWavz
SGC
Spiderbeam
Universal Radio, Inc.
VIS Amateur Supply
Vibroplex
Virginia Beach Hamfest
W & W Manufacturing
W3FF Antennas
- - - - - -

For what it’s worth, the December 2007 issue of QST had 136 advertisers listed and the January 2008 issue of QST has 103 advertisers listed.  Normal seasonal variation? Dissentions? I just don’t know and I am not going to bother to count the December 2006 and January 2007 issue lists.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #24 on: December 15, 2007, 04:14:19 PM »

Companies that advertised in QCWA Journal, Vol. 56 No. 4 Winter 2007 and did not advertise in January 2008 QST:

Antique Wireless Association (has quarterly Journal and annual Review)
CQ Magazine (monthly)
hamradioprints.com
Old Old Timers Club
Popular Communications magazine (monthly)
Quarter Century Wireless Association (QCWA) (has quarterly Journal)
Radio City, Inc.
RF Parts Company
WorldRadio magazine (monthly)
- - - - - - - -

I just received a card in the mail offering a 3 month free subscription to WorldRadio.  I’ll be sending it in Monday.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 18 queries.