The AM Forum
June 18, 2024, 12:45:31 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Good Digital Photos or Good Camera - Suggestions Please  (Read 12814 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #25 on: August 30, 2009, 10:18:39 PM »

Good purchase. The Nikons are proven and the lens are excellent. Those separate the D90 from the point-end-shoot type cameras, even the high end ones. You can always use the lens on the next Nikon you buy too.
Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2009, 10:23:07 PM »

Is that W1AW?  Cheesy

Ah yes, the northern relay station.  Wink
Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2009, 10:25:00 PM »

Good purchase. The Nikons are proven and the lens are excellent. Those separate the D90 from the point-end-shoot type cameras, even the high end ones. You can always use the lens on the next Nikon you buy too.

Just got to find a good bag, that does not look like a camera bag.
Tnx agn for the tip.

What format do you shoot in Steve?
I see there are several choices on the camera itself.
Logged
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2009, 10:30:16 PM »

There are some "bags" that are actually backpacks. Lots of room and less hassle to carry.

I usually shot the highest res JPEG setting. If you want to have some fun, shoot with the RAW format. It makes HUGE files but with the Nikon Capture software, you can almost "reshoot" the photo if you don't have the settings exactly correct on the camera. It won't fix out of focus though.  Cry   

There is a NEF plug-in for Photoshop to that will allow some editing directly in Photoshop.
Logged
WQ9E
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3285



« Reply #29 on: August 31, 2009, 09:50:25 AM »

RAW files are really the way to go, you can always convert them to Jpeg or TIFF but with RAW you basically get the original sensor data so you can correct for a number of issues.  Given the cheap price for memory cards and hard drive storage today file size shouldn't be much of an issue.  I imagine your camera also came with photo stitching software which nearly automatically stitches a number of frames together for very high resolution landscapes.  There are some good quality and fairly inexpensive places online to print very large images in case you decide to wall paper your room with images of some of your nicely restored gear  Smiley

A quick hint for low light shooting in natural light: if you slightly over expose when using the highest sensitivity settings and save as RAW files you can generally end up with less noise in your final processing.

I haven't used Nikon since I had their gear in the 70's but their glass is generally first rate.  They fell behind a bit early in the digital era due to the financial drain from their parent company Mitsubishi Heavy but have now caught up again.  Enjoy the camera and your first samples look very good, great choice!

Digital photography has come a long way in a very short time.  I bought my first digital just before going to Cuba in 1999.  To test the waters and avoid having to bring my bag of camera gear along I bought a little point and shoot with a grand total of 3 megapixels that cost around $1,200 bucks without batteries or memory card.  The images were OK but the speed was horrible; about 35 seconds to "boot up", close to 1 second shutter lag, and worst of all you could shoot one image but then had to wait about 10 seconds for transfer to memory card before you could capture a second image.  That thing almost ended up in Havana bay due to my frustration!  I rarely use the 10 FPS capability of my current camera but I sure wish I had that 10 years ago-I missed a lot of great images from my time in Cuba.

Rodger WQ9E
Logged

Rodger WQ9E
W1JS
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 219



« Reply #30 on: August 31, 2009, 12:10:11 PM »

Nice camera!  Shocked 

Tamrac makes a wide selection of quality bags:

http://www.tamrac.com/welcome.htm

We have a Tamrac backpack we use for traveling and it handles both DLSR's and a small laptop.
Logged

73 de
W1JS
Jack
No. Weare NH
W1DAN
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 904



« Reply #31 on: August 31, 2009, 06:32:05 PM »

Bruce:

I am not a pro, but know a few things:

1) White balance. Your photos inside are warm (brownish) because the camera is balanced for outdoor lighting (as you displayed with the photo of your house). Shoot a piece of paper by the radio you wanna shoot. You can then correct somewhat in Photoshop (best to white balance off the paper before taking the shot).

2) More light is better. CCD cameras have a high noise floor. A larger lens helps here as well. I add lighting from the sides at a 30 degree angle to eliminate front on reflections. A key light should be stronger than the fill light. Use depth of field and lower lighting on the background to separate your subject from the background.

3) JPEG compression will garbage not only the dark areas, but color as well. This is why people suggest shooting RAW.

4) As stated earlier, I take photos of a radio outside on a cloudy day...strong smooth light. A bed sheet or old curtian can be the backdrop.

A better camera will give you a larger lens, manual adjustments as well as RAW output.

Good luck!!

Dan
W1DAN
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.046 seconds with 18 queries.