The AM Forum
May 04, 2024, 03:18:22 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: ARRL Extra Class Q&A #4 - Spread-Spectrum and Frequency Hopping  (Read 5258 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« on: November 22, 2006, 03:37:13 PM »

Here is another question & answer (my last, yay!) from the ARRL Extra class 2002 question pool that irks me.  This may be one of the 2 that I got wrong on the test.  I vaguely remember seeing this question in the 16 practice tests I took and noting a confusion factor for me.  (This is when you need to remember the literal answer for the literal question.  Hey I don’t have a photographic memory.)  Frequency-hopping (FH) and spread-spectrum together?  It was confusing for me.  I am interested in your expert comments.

“ E2C09  How does the spread-spectrum technique of frequency hopping (FH) work?

A.     If interference is detected by the receiver it will signal the transmitter to change
         frequencies.
B.     If interference is detected by the receiver it will signal the transmitter to wait until   
         the frequency is clear.
C.    A pseudo-random binary bit stream is used to shift the phase of an RF carrier     
        very rapidly in a particular sequence.
D.    The frequency of the transmitted signal is changed very rapidly according to a
        particular sequence also used by the receiving station.

D.  FH spread-spectrum is a form of spreading in which the center frequency of a conventional carrier is altered many times per second in accordance with a list of frequency channels.  The same frequency list is used by the receiving station which “hops” in sync with the transmitter. ” 

In my mind, spread-spectrum (SS) and frequency-hopping (FH) have always been two different things.  They both can be used to obscure the content of a radio transmission’s information.  I think this is the only reason for FH.

Upon investigation, the problem with this Q&A is the wording of the question, which is incorrect in my opinion.  What I thought of as spread-spectrum is specifically Direct Sequence Spread-Spectrum (DSSS).  Frequency-hopping is actually Frequency-Hopping Spread-Spectrum (FHSS).  Spread-Spectrum is the general term for the field of techniques apparently, I didn’t know this.

The Question E2C09 “How does the spread-spectrum technique of frequency hopping (FH) work?” should be worded “How does the frequency hopping (FH) technique of spread-spectrum work?”  Does grammar allow both ways and the ambiguity?

Because of the way the question was worded, I chose C. which does describe DSSS.  D. does describe FHSS.  And so the study book explanation for the answer D. is correct.  They did want you to think of frequency hopping and choose D.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Some background on Spread-Spectrum:

The FH mode allows the use of narrow band receivers.  I believe that many implementations may allow at least 10 milliseconds to be spent on a channel.  Can be implemented with SSB transceivers, and is.  “High” bandwidth transceivers and “high” bandwidth data can allow much higher hopping rates to be implemented, I presume.

DSSS has many other advantages including resistance to multi-path propagation and jamming.  Many users can be on one r.f. channel, also known as CDMA (code division multiple access) for example, cell phone systems and reception of all of the GPS satellites in view are on the same channel.  DSSS can also operate in a band with existing narrow band signals and vice-versa.

From ["Spread Spectrum Communications", Charles E. Cook et al (Ed.), IEEE Press, New York, 1983. ISBN 0-87942-170-3]. :

The most important practical modes of spread spectrum coding are Direct Sequence (DS) and Frequency Hopping (FH). In DS, a pseudo random sequence is phase-shift-keyed (PSK) onto the carrier. In FH, a frequency synthesizer is driven by a pseudo random sequence of numbers to generate output frequencies that "hop around" in the desired frequency range.

Spread Spectrum development began during World War II, with the earliest studies dating from the 1920s. Most papers remained classified until the 1980s.

Frequency hopping spread spectrum was invented by Hedy Lamarr ("the most beautiful girl in the world", Samson and Delilah etc.) and the composer George Antheil. They held a patent filed in 1942. Direct sequence spread spectrum was invented by Paul Kotowski and Kurt Dannehl at Telefunken.

The technique is used extensively in military communications today. Commercial applications include cellular telephony and mobile networking.

Hedy Lamarr, http://www.ncafe.com/chris/pat2/.

- - - - - - - - -
Any comments?
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2006, 03:52:16 PM »

I would think SS happens at base band and FH happens at carrier output.
No reason why both can't happen at the same time...if you really need to sbe
Logged
KB2WIG
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4467



« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2006, 04:27:31 PM »

Hedy came upon the (her) idea while watching someone play the piano. Her interest was in remote controll of torpedos and how to defeat countermeasures.... she was sharp...    klc
Logged

What? Me worry?
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2006, 05:08:21 PM »

That's HEDLEY!
Logged
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2006, 07:31:34 PM »

I guess what I have a problem with is the use of the term "spread-spectrum" as the umbrella term for the DSSS and HFSS techniques.  I don't consider frequency-hopping as spread-spectrum.

Perhaps some term like "Radio Signal Obscurement" RSO methods would have been better as the umbrella term.  Oh well.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
N8LGU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 197



« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2006, 07:59:11 PM »

Maybe we should call it rapid sequencial QSY!
Logged

"Rock Cave Dave"
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #6 on: November 22, 2006, 08:37:41 PM »

I work with a guy who's Dad was a sub commander in WW2. Back when the bad guys didn't need sonar. They just waited for the fish to bounce off the hull to warn then to set charges.
I met his mother once who had stories to tell about it and my buddy and I were on the edge of our seats for a couple hours.
Logged
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4611



« Reply #7 on: November 22, 2006, 10:03:11 PM »

No, FH has always (as I've been taught in college and in the gummint) been considered spread spectrum.  Boiled down to their elements, direct sequence spread spectrum and pseudo random FH are essentially the same.  FH is just a LOT slower than direct sequence.
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117



« Reply #8 on: November 22, 2006, 11:12:52 PM »

Dave,

You know I was going to mention quick QSY - "QQSY" as a term for FH and then it slipped from my mind!
We're on the same wavelength - no frequency-hopping.

O.K. so under the new KLR semantics:

The old -

Spread Spectrum Techniques
1. DSSS
2. FHSS

Becomes New KLR Terminology (no confusion) HI.

Radio Signal Obscurement (RSO) Techniques
1. SS
2. QQSY

John,

I don't agree that FH and DSSS are essentially the same thing.  DSSS needs auto-corellation as a required part of the signal recovery.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
w3jn
Johnny Novice
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4611



« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2006, 08:41:51 AM »

My statement was a bit simplistic.  FH signals are generally analog modulated in some way (although they can also be digitally modulated).  A numeric seuqnce essentially modulates the synthesizer in a pseudorandom fashion.  At a discrete point in time the signal is at one particular frequency.

With DS the numeric sequence modulates the digital data in a balanced mixer.  Again, at a discrete point in time there's a signal only at one frequency.

And the general idea is the same - to spread the RF energy out so as to achieve low density at a discrete frequency.
Logged

FCC:  "The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency and on-the-air conduct."
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.105 seconds with 19 queries.