The AM Forum
May 18, 2024, 05:10:27 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: RM-11305/IARU Bandplan for Region 2 ?  (Read 6106 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2118



« on: January 21, 2006, 12:31:10 PM »

One of the comments filed against RM-11305 by Mike W2ZE states that the petition's change would be contrary to the IARU bandplan for region 2.

Anyone know what this is specifically referring to?

Thanks.  ( 2 weeks left to file comments, gentlemen.)
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
K1MVP
Guest
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2006, 01:44:06 PM »

   "two weeks left to comment"  from WA3KLR,

Tom,
I did at one time, think the FCC would "listen" to well structured comments,
but I now have my doubts.

I did file comments back in April of 2004 relavant to the RM-10867, which
had to do with "license restucturing" of which was a "pet peeve" of mine,
and was dissapointed with both the FCC`s response to the NPRM and
the number of comments filed,(very minimal IMO).

It would appear to me that that the FCC is just interested in "streamlining"
their workload, and are just going through the formality of "listening"
to comments.

This is just "my opinion", but that is the sense I get from previous proposals.

                                     73, K1MVP
Logged
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2118



« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2006, 06:30:42 PM »

I wouldn't discount the power of a well-written comment by a lone amateur.  In my opinion it can have, at least, the weight of a petition from the ARRL.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

For an insight of ARRL stunts and the nitty-gritty on the ad hoc ARRL committee that "authored" RM-11306 see this QRZ.com posting by Skip KH6TY, a member of that ARRL HF Digital ad hoc committee. 

In my opinion, this is a MUST READ for doing your homework on RM-11305 and RM-11306.
His posting is halfway down the page:

http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard.cgi?s=d025dfe734da9b72211e141821081302;act=ST;f=3;t=111259;st=180

(you may need to reformat this long link above or copy and paste it into your browser URL address line.)

Within the QRZ posting is a link to a report he alone wrote on this ad hoc committee:

http://www.zerobeat.net/bandplan-dissent.html

Very enlightening, grasshopper.
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
Tom WA3KLR
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2118



« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2006, 03:13:38 PM »

Here is the link to the IARU bandplan for region 2, from the IARU website.

By the way, the IARU Secretary right now is David Sumner K1ZZ.


http://www.iaru-regionii.org/Region_2_HF_Band_Plan.html
Logged

73 de Tom WA3KLR  AMI # 77   Amplitude Modulation - a force Now and for the Future!
WD8BIL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4400


« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2006, 06:49:02 PM »

The proposal isn't contrary to the Region 2 bandplan as much as it "goes beyond" their intentions.
As I stated elsewhere, if the FCC does anything positive with RM-11305 I think it will be within those guidelines.

 
Logged
N9NEO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 282


« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2006, 08:14:02 PM »

After reading the dissenting opinion all I can say is YIKES!

Reminds me of that whole We are the Borg thing.  Remember their motto - "You will be assimilated, resistance is futile"

Seems like the winlink proponents are trying to hijack the bands and the ARRL is willing to let that happen.  What a shame.

 
Logged

I'd rather be anatomically correct than politically correct!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 19 queries.