The AM Forum
December 12, 2024, 12:37:21 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Amp recommendation: Viking T-bolt vs. HK Warrior  (Read 3032 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
KD2AZI
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 27


« on: January 02, 2020, 04:20:29 PM »

I have two amps available, and I have no experience using either of them.  I've scoured online posts, and eHam.net reviews about the Viking Thunderbolt and the Heathkit Warrior.  Both are in great shape and I've refurbished the Viking.

Do you have any suggestions, pros/cons of which one to use for my ART-13 setup?
tnx!

Happy New Year!

Logged
DMOD
AC0OB - A Place where Thermionic Emitters Rule!
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1806


« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2020, 04:37:50 PM »

Since I am a fan of 4-400's I would use the T-Bolt for AM. The Warrior with its puny 811's pales in comparison.

Pages 12-15 describes how to feed and load up the T-Bolt for Class AB2 operation.


Phil - AC0OB
Logged

Charlie Eppes: Dad would be so happy if we married a doctor.
Don Eppes: Yeah, well, Dad would be happy if I married someone with a pulse.NUMB3RS   Smiley
MikeKE0ZUinkcmo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 444



« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2020, 05:17:42 PM »

+1 for the T-bolt.   Johnson works on all bands, and since your familiar with it....   
Logged

Mike KE0ZU

Bold Text and PICS are usually links

https://mikeharrison.smugmug.com/
kb3ouk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1640

The Voice of Fulton County


« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2020, 07:06:52 PM »

My opinion, neither. The ART-13 alone does at least 100 watts by itself, you could probably easily get 150 out of it with some care. The 811As in the Warrior only give you 260 watts of dissipation, so for AM without stressing components too hard you would only comfortably be able to get about 125 watts or so from it. The Thunderbolt's 4-400s will give you 800 watts of dissipation so would probably be good for a maximum of just under 400 watts of carrier. However, it sounds like that amp only does about 1000 watts ssb, so on AM you would be running around 250 watts. By that point you are only 3 db over what the ART-13 does alone. Plus the Thunderbolt is grid driven so you would have to run either reduced plate voltage on the ART-13 or an attenuator, since it doesn't need much drive.
Logged

Clarke's Second Law: The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is by venturing a little past them into the impossible
K1JJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8886


"Let's go kayaking, Tommy!" - Yaz


« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2020, 07:35:30 PM »

Yep, agreed.   The ART-13 is already in the AM league of those linears.  It's all about the better efficiency of the ART-13's class C  AM operation.  

Usually we look for at least 6DB of gain to make it noticeable and a worthy improvement.  That is four times the power increase which is a 600 watt carrier. (4X 150 watts)

You would be better off refining the ART-13 and letting it run alone.  Then use the linears using a ricebox driver as intended.  Then look to build up a bigger AM plate modulated rig like 813s X 813s or whatever - like W9JSW is doing here in his thread.    Or a  24 MOSFET class E  AM rig is a great choice.

BTW, if you were to use a linear like say, a 3CX-3000A7 (3 KW diss tube) or equivalent, then the ART-13 would be at a suitable driver power level. (about 10 DB of bigger carrier)  Though you would need to clean up the audio which will take some work.

Good Luck -

T

Logged

Use an "AM Courtesy Filter" to limit transmit audio bandwidth  +-4.5 KHz, +-6.0 KHz or +-8.0 KHz when needed.  Easily done in DSP.

Wise Words : "I'm as old as I've ever been... and I'm as young as I'll ever be."

There's nothing like an old dog.
KD2AZI
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 27


« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2020, 10:08:04 AM »

Quote
at least 6DB of gain

Yes, so I would need an attenuator, so I get it, I'm attenuating way down to get the 6DB of gain as a best practice - so why bother.

I should have mentioned that my Tbolt has PL-175s, and from what I'm reading and tube data that this doesn't make much difference in the equation over 4-400s.
Thanks gents for the input!

Logged
w4bfs
W4 Beans For Supper
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1434


more inpoot often yields more outpoot


« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2020, 09:50:54 PM »

the T-bolt as well as most EFJ transmitters tend to have too much trapped heat ... Timtron has the real fix for these ....  large quiet muffin exhaust fan on the back panel ... smaller quiet fans underneath .... ditch the impeller fans

its a lot of work but convert to grounded grid with vacuum c1, bigger inductor more B+ .... I have gotten 1600W out with 4-400 pulls .... good audio reports
Logged

Beefus

O would some power the gift give us
to see ourselves as others see us.
It would from many blunders free us.         Robert Burns
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8301



WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2020, 03:37:40 AM »

Yes vacuum C1 as the HV rating of the caps leaves little room for increased voltage.  My thunderbolt had blown the plate transformer and a 'properly' rated external one was almost twice the size. The same voltage was kept though.
Logged

Radio Candelstein
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.048 seconds with 19 queries.