Steve, yes. I've just shown the min. and max. Intermediate 'frames' and real time viewing show rising and falling of the crud. You'll note the rising and falling of the freq spread/intensity in the waterfall showing the progression over time.
At any rate a direct connection with short, new coax eliminated virtually all the wah wah (as in music) effect from very bad to not so bad.
In addition I see Elecraft had issued a tech. mod. for dirty KPA3's at one time; not my later serial no. rig which has the fix. Not related to my findings but makes one wonder if Sherwood duplicated ARRL's earlier review with the unmodified PA. ARRL later amended test with the fix, but who knows.
At any rate my IM 3, 5 and 7's measurement peaks pretty much track Sherwood's but without all the attendant high grass and crud that his show.
Fred, yes two tones internally generated in the K3 as explained in previous posts today. The two largest twin peaks represent the audio fundamentals, 700 and 1900 Hz. They are 6db down from a phantom point between the two representing PEP. IM3, 5, etc. clearly show and are accurate relative to the fundamental tones.
The 50 ohm dummy load is about as pure as you can get at the low frequencies involved, totally encased in metal and oil cooled.
Yes, Your comments mirror tons of discussion on this and other boards. The whole thread on EHam and reason for my testing came about because an Icom marine transmitter with 12 volt finals matched a much more stringent FCC mask than what most ham transmitters produce. Generally the writers wanted to know why the Icom/Yeasu/...etc. including Elecraft couldn't produce ham rigs just as clean. A whole host of reasons, some quaint, some cracked, some market related, some disingenuous, ...you name it ensued.
Read the eham thread for far more than you've ever wished, both technically and sophomorically.