The AM Forum
May 03, 2024, 12:03:39 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Johnson TR Switch on 160 meters  (Read 4242 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
sndtubes
Guest
« on: December 17, 2012, 09:08:05 AM »

I want to use a Johnson TR switch on 160 for full breakin CW.  I know they are not designed to work on 160.  Has anyone modified theirs to work on 160?  I guess the input / output circuit needs to be changed.  I don't want to lose 80 thru 10 either.  Any ideas?

Logged
kb3rdt
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 249


poop cup


« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2012, 02:18:49 AM »

mine has a 110v relay!

what you useing it on if you have 110v on transmitt can mod it that way!
Logged
sndtubes
Guest
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2012, 01:14:06 AM »

Thanks but I dont want to use a relay.  I want to use the Johnson tr switch on 160.  That's why I asked the question.
Logged
VE3AJM
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 378



« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2012, 06:50:38 AM »

I have the Johnson relay here too. I've haven't tried this myself, but have you tried to use it on 160m?

I know the unit will give quite a bit of receive amplification when tied into the station receiver to overcome the losses of having it in line. Perhaps the unit is optimal for 80-10m but will work on 160m, but not quite as well on receive on that band.

Al VE3AJM
Logged
sndtubes
Guest
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2012, 10:18:09 AM »

It will work with lots of attenuation.  Not optimal
Logged
WQ9E
Member

Online Online

Posts: 3287



« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2012, 10:21:32 AM »

I have never tried mine on 160 either because I am using it with a Johnson transmitter that doesn't cover 160.

I expect T2 is the issue on 160.   L1 and L2 should be fine as will the .005 coupling capacitor values.  Try it, the worst that could happen is too much receiver attenuation on 160 and given the noise levels on the band it may be fine for you depending upon your antenna and local noise conditions.

Make sure that your antenna is reasonably matched if you are running high power.  The power rating is based upon near unity SWR.  If the filter caps haven't been replaced recently they will need it.  The T/R switch runs very warm so pay the small additional amount for 105C instead of standard 85C caps.
Logged

Rodger WQ9E
K1ZJH
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 299


« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2012, 12:09:34 AM »

If it would prove anything I could sweep mine on the 141T analyzer and TG combo.

Pete
Logged
KM1H
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3519



« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2012, 10:21:03 AM »

Sounds like a good idea to me Pete.

Carl
Logged
VE3AJM
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 378



« Reply #8 on: December 23, 2012, 10:04:14 AM »

I tried using it yesterday on 160m. The relay works fine on transmit, and for receive, I disconnected the barrel of the coax going to my receiver from the relay, and it then worked well on 160m for receive. No suck out/attentuation effects noted of received signals.

For me its better than trying to re-engineer the relay. Up to you of course.

Al VE3AJM
Logged
WQ9E
Member

Online Online

Posts: 3287



« Reply #9 on: December 23, 2012, 11:11:34 AM »

Al,

I am glad it is working out for you.  If noise into your receiver becomes a problem (due to the disconnected coax shield) try adding an additional coil of about 40 turns of #24 on a 3/4" form on the "cold" end of T2 (the end opposite the plate connection to V1B) and I expect this will allow normal gain on 160 with the coax connected without impacting the other bands. 
Logged

Rodger WQ9E
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 19 queries.