The AM Forum
May 17, 2024, 01:20:20 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Need some pictures of t368c RF Deck  (Read 7229 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kd3ht
Guest
« on: August 31, 2010, 05:24:12 PM »

I’m rebuilding a T368C RF deck and need a couple of pictures of the antenna connection on the RF deck.  I have some extra square ceramic posts but not sure if the connections are just the posts to the assembly on the case or if there is a piece of springy metal like the high voltage connections on the rear of the RF deck.  If someone could take a picture of both the antenna connection and the B+ connections on the RF deck, be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Steve, kd3ht
Logged
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654



« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2010, 08:48:30 PM »

You need the book.  There are complete pictures in the book.  To answer your question, Yes, There are contacts.  I can pull my deck out and take some photos for you but I have to wait until another person is here to help me lift the deck out.

Please go to this link and download the manuals.. If it does not help you, let me know.

http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/military/t368/



C
Logged
kd3ht
Guest
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2010, 09:03:40 PM »

Thanks for the link.  unfortunately the copy of the scanned photographs is very poor and don't help!!  I have many versions of the manuals in PDF but they all share the same poor scanned picture characteristics!! 
Seems that accessibility is a normal issue hihi.  Everyone has their rigs stacked and pressed together.  I certainly don;t wish to have you harm yourself, there certainly are enough rigs around!   Thanks for the offer either way.

Steve, kd3ht
Logged
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654



« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2010, 09:58:13 PM »

Tell me what manual and photos you need, I will pull my repro manuals out the closet and snap high quality photos for you. 

C
Logged
kd3ht
Guest
« Reply #4 on: August 31, 2010, 10:23:25 PM »

Thanks...
Figure 39 RF deck of basic in TM 11-809-35
Figure 40 RF deck of B model in same
Figure 41 RF deck of C model in same

I think this would do it!  If the metal finger looks the same as the fingers that contact the HV connections on the modulator and HV deck, I should be able to fabricate.

Appreciate your help and time..

Steve
Logged
W1UJR
Guest
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2010, 10:24:28 PM »

http://www.w1ujr.net/photos.htm
Logged
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654



« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2010, 11:02:14 PM »

I think UJR has what you need.. Let me know if not, I will take the photos for you.  I am on my T368C (BW) calling CQ on 75!

C
Logged
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4132


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 31, 2010, 11:57:28 PM »


My deck is unknown version (to me, no tag, and I haven't gotten that deep into it) BUT it is out, and sitting on its side under the bench to the left of the main op position. So, IF you post a picture of the area on the deck that you need, I will slide mine out and post a picture of what mine has in the same spot! Cheesy

              _-_-bear
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654



« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2010, 12:15:41 AM »

I want to bring up something as a side note.  If you look at the pictures in the link UJR provided you see one mistake.  The Parasitic choke for the 4-400 is backwards.  Mine was like this also. If you look in the manual for the transmitter, This choke is supposed to be at the plate of the tube.  It may actualy not matter as mine worked before I corrected this.  I have no idea why some transmitters have this choke at the tank coil.

C
Logged
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2814



WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 01, 2010, 11:02:27 AM »

it probably doesn't matter electrically because for one thing, the silver plated strap is so wide.

My guess is they were reversed to get the suppressor away from the anode heat.
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
kd3ht
Guest
« Reply #10 on: September 01, 2010, 11:06:06 AM »

Thanks everyone.  These pics will help greatly.  Also received some pics from a post on the mil surplaus mailing list.  I'll include them here so someone else could get help in the future!  Bear, the differences are subtle.  Although the later decks have an extra choke beneath L4.  I'm in process of making the changes described in Tim's mods and others to remove B+ off the caps and coils.

Steve, kd3ht


* DSCF0012.JPG (318.29 KB, 1280x960 - viewed 485 times.)

* DSCF0013.JPG (306.92 KB, 1280x960 - viewed 459 times.)
Logged
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654



« Reply #11 on: September 01, 2010, 09:41:34 PM »

LOL...  Anode heat.   

Well.. I have seen some setup backwards. Clearly, You want the choke by the tube as per the pictures in the manual.  My T3 used to oscilate. I made lots of posts about it and we could never fix it.  Finally, I noticed that backwards choke and fixed it. No more oscilations. I am sure its was done for some reason. My guess, Is that one some frequency or band, the rig tuned up better or ran more stable.  But on 75 and 160, The rig wants that choke the correct way.  Also.. The tuning chart in the book is now a reality.

Cya

C


it probably doesn't matter electrically because for one thing, the silver plated strap is so wide.

My guess is they were reversed to get the suppressor away from the anode heat.
Logged
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2814



WWW
« Reply #12 on: September 02, 2010, 08:50:26 AM »

Hi Clark,  tnx for the correction.  Much appreciated.   but I'm perplexed because you firstly posted:

"It may actualy not matter as mine worked before I corrected this.  I have no idea why some transmitters have this choke at the tank coil."

but then you wrote:  "My T3 used to oscilate. I made lots of posts about it and we could never fix it.  Finally, I noticed that backwards choke and fixed it. No more oscilations. I am sure its was done for some reason. My guess, Is that one some frequency or band, the rig tuned up better or ran more stable."

So you seemed to already have a solution/answer.  I apologize for making assumptions based on your earlier message.   I don't own a T3 and could not even see clearly the construction of the suppressor.  It is probably pretty robust.  I'm especially interested in how the length of such a wide silver strap between the suppressor and anode could make a difference on the extreme low bands.  The answer may be in how the suppressor is constructed.  If you or someone else could provide that information and the parasitic frequency that would be great.  Another learning opportunity  Grin

Rob
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4132


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2010, 02:07:34 PM »


Heresy perhaps, but maybe a "Measures" type suppressor (nichrome) might be good??

                    _-_-bear
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.048 seconds with 18 queries.