The AM Forum
April 28, 2024, 09:14:52 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Mackay 3010B Receiver Test Results  (Read 2838 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
W1VD
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 401



« on: December 22, 2009, 04:37:24 PM »

Receiver: Mackay 3010B

Front end attenuator OFF:

Band    MDSBlocking DR   Two-tone DR
  (20 kHz)  (20 kHz)
80 meters   -146 dBm         93 dB    68 dB
40 meters   -141 dBm         96 dB    67 dB
20 meters   -140 dBm        102 dB    68 dB

Front end attenuation ON 1st position:

Band    MDSBlocking DR   Two-tone DR
  (20 kHz)  (20 kHz)
80 meters   -135 dBm         94 dB    66 dB
40 meters   -128 dBm         98 dB    69 dB
20 meters   -126 dBm        103 dB    69 dB


AM audio S/N: 43 dB

AM Audio Frequency Response: in dB, referenced to 1 kHz measurement   

100 Hz  200 Hz  400 Hz  600 Hz  800 Hz  1 kHz  2 kHz  3 kHz  4 kHz  5 kHz  6 kHz
-4   +1   0   +2   +2   0   -2   -10   -24   -40    


AM Audio Distortion:

Mod  100 Hz  200 Hz  400 Hz  600 Hz   800 Hz  1 kHz   2 kHz
30%  13%  8.9%  7.1%  6.3%  5.6%  4.5%  4.0%
50%  13%  7.9%  6.3%  6.3%  6.3%  6.3%  7.9%
70%  20%  13%  11%  10%  7.1%  6.3%  7.1%
90%  32%  22%  16%  14%  11%  7.9%  7.9%
100%  40%  25%  18%  16%  13%  8.9%  8.9%

Notes: This receiver is pretty uncommon so a few comments are in order. With 0 dB front end attenuation and maximum i-f gain this receiver has extraordinary gain and sensitivity - especially at the lower frequencies. Designed mainly as a shipboard receiver it is likely this receiver would have performed well on 500 kHz with the ships antenna fully encrusted in ice and laying on the deck! Words can not adequately describe the unbridled gain of this receiver - you'll just have to try one for yourself.

The receiver is extremely well built on a cast aluminum foundation in which individual stages occupy their own compartments. DC and bias voltages enter through feedthrough capacitors and signal openings from compartment to compartment are kept as small as possible. One wishes all receivers were built this way!

Unfortunately, the blocking and two-tone dynamic range numbers tested disappointingly low - even with the i-f gain of the receiver cut way way back. Considerable time was spent to ensure that the receiver was functioning, as best as one can tell, to factory specifications. All voltages were correct, as was LO injection levels when compared with the figures given in the manual. The rf circuitry used is somewhat unconventional. The receiver covers from 70 kHz to 30 MHz and uses up conversion to a first i-f of 38 MHz. The main signal path includes a manually switched front end attenuator, manually switched front end bandpass filters that feeds a single stage 7788 tube rf amplifier. Signal from the plate of the rf amplifier passes through a 14 section 30 Mhz low pass filter. This is applied to a 6C4 cathode follower that feeds the 1st mixer - a quad of 1N82A 'VHF' diodes in a balanced design. The signal is amplified and filtered by two tuned circuits, a single 6688 amplifier tube and two more tuned circuits. A 6BL8 triode section forms another cathode follower which feeds the grid of the 6BL8 pentode section as the 2nd mixer with an output at 5.94 MHz. A somewhat unusual arrangement has the LO injection in series with the rf signal to the grid. The plate of the 2nd mixer passes through a 6 kHz wide crystal lattice filter. From there it's on to the third mixer - a 6BE6 converter stage - for the final i-f of 455 kHz. Here, the signal encounters the Collins mechanical filters for either SSB or CW. No additional filter is used here for AM - just the 6 kHz filter in the previous i-f. The remainder of the circuitry is pretty straightforward. One nice feature of this receiver is that it does have a product detector.

This receiver was on loan so it was only possible to observe its performance - not modify the receiver to try to improve it. In order to locate the source of the poor dynamic range a high impedance probe / spectrum analyzer setup was used to 'sniff' IMD stage by stage. The culprit turned out to be the 6BL8 2nd mixer stage. With simple tests and limited time I was unable to determine the exact cause of the poor IMD performance but would suspect the 6BL8 biasing, or more likely the crystal filter in the plate circuit or the VFO amplifier which has it's output in series with the rf signal. Even if the IMD could be improved in the second mixer, next in line is the 3rd mixer - a 6BE6 converter - generally a dynamic range 'show stopper' in receivers where it's used. This would be one fun receiver to modify for truly high performance!

The AM distortion numbers show the somewhat typical increase at lower audio frequencies - most often caused by the low audio frequencies riding on the AGC line. Also there is the usual increase in audio distortion as the modulation percentage increases. This is due to the detector's inability to cleanly demodulate the higher amplitude levels.

Info on the measurement setups and test results on other receivers can be found at:

http://www.w1vd.com/BAreceivertest.html
Logged

'Tnx Fer the Dope OM'.
WA1GFZ
Member

Online Online

Posts: 11152



« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2009, 12:01:17 PM »

I would swap out those 1n82s first.
Logged
W1VD
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 401



« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2009, 03:43:46 PM »

That was my first inclination as well...until I started 'sniffing' for IMD stage by stage with the high impedance probe / spectrum analyzer. The weak link was the 2nd mixer. Suspect that the 3rd mixer - a 6BE6 converter stage (yuk) - would be next to fold up and finally the 1st mixer. There are some interesting ideas in there but overall it's a bit helter skelter.   
Logged

'Tnx Fer the Dope OM'.
KM1H
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3519



« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2009, 05:37:06 PM »

At least a 6BY6 can replace the 6BE6 for some modest improvement but that 2nd mixer sounds like a good candidate for a Pullen or 7360.

That 7788 is one impressive tube, Amperex outdid themselves but it is relatively short lived. And difficult to tame in a typical open chassis radio.

Carl
KM1H
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Online Online

Posts: 11152



« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2009, 05:53:59 PM »

Sounds like the gain distribution is a mess. The price you could pay for a lower MDS.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 19 queries.