The AM Forum
May 09, 2024, 10:42:57 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Another idea for a 1929 AWA QSO Party rig.  (Read 1677 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10037



« on: December 12, 2008, 06:02:14 PM »

I have seen many descriptions of early transmitters that used raw a.c. on the plate(s) of the tube(s), usually a  self-excited oscillator.  Those things usually put out a signal that was not much better than what you would get from a spark transmitter, and the new regulations that went into effect in 1929 required "adequate filtering" for the transmitter power supply.

I had thought of a very simply way to make a MOPA put out a clean signal without rectifier tubes or filter capacitors for the high power stage, although rectification and minimal filtering would be required for the low power master oscillator stage.

Build the final stage with two triodes so that the grids are in parallel and the plates in push-pull.  Split the plate tank coil and rf-couple the two halves together with a mica capacitor.  Then feed the plate of each final tube directly off the HV transformer, with the midtap grounded.  This would form a high level balanced modulator, a DSB suppressed carrier rig modulated by a 60~ tone.  The result would be two clean carriers spaced 120~ apart, to give a clean 120 Hz tone in the receiver.

The circuit would have been feasible in 1929, since the high level balanced modulator circuit was already well known before the mid-20's.  I have a description of a circuit in a 1922 Army Signal Corps manual.  This was one of the very earliest forms of SSB, used for VLF trans-Atlantic communication.  The high Q of the tank circuit and short (for the wavelength) loaded Marconi antenna provided the selectivity that suppressed one sideband.  AM would have been impossible because of the difficulty of designing an antenna at those frequencies, broad enough to radiate both sidebands.

I seem to have read somewhere that my idea for a CW rig was actually used commercially, since it saved the costs of the high power filter/rectifier components.  This was during the days when "slop jar"  rectifiers were popular with hams, I believe by mixing up a borax solution and dipping two aluminium  strips into the liquid, so the economic saving would have been worthwhile.  Larger rigs used mercury arc rectifiers, a large glass bulb where the hot cathode was an arc between an electrode and a pool of mercury.  You started the arc by tilting the rectifier.  Those must have been a real PITA to keep running.  It would have been economical enough to build a simple half wave low power rectifier/filter to run the master oscillator to provide clean drive to the amplifier.  I'm surprised no-one thought of using this circuit for amateur transmitters when the 1929 regs went into effect.  MCW was still legal then; you just couldn't run raw a.c. on a tube, particularly a self-excited oscillator.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
WU2D
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1797


CW is just a narrower version of AM


« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2008, 08:28:55 AM »

Pretty cool idea and it would work! They had most of the tools and technology by 1929.

The 1926 ARRL handbook that I have shows a full crystal controlled MOPA so they had that technology too.

Another interesting section is devoted to making your own HV rectifiers using canning jars, Borax and aluminum and lead strips. You put a little mineral oil on the top of each to "seal" the mix and then form the rectifiers. You need around 10 jars to make a decent full wave rectifier and this mess lived on a shelf below the operating position. The result was equivalent to two 1N4007's in PIV.

This "liquid state" approach was still considered more economical than the new tube rectifiers which were  big dollars.
Logged

These are the good old days of AM
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 19 queries.