|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
 |
« on: November 26, 2006, 07:36:13 PM » |
|
From Al, "Al", (Al) W1UX" "Yes, it's the HUZ-man's OUTSTANDING AM signal on 1885 kcs. showing a lesser peeeeeeeeeeee-w AM signal down on 1880, captured LIVE on the W1UX panoramic adapter/SP-600 receiving engine." TNX Al.  Image gallery link. http://amfone.net/index.php?ind=gallery&op=foto_show&ida=105 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
W1UJR
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2006, 02:01:58 PM » |
|
You be strapping man, got the "cash heat" going with the "muddy water slapper"? C'awn maon. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
 Offline
Posts: 11151
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2006, 02:57:52 PM » |
|
Man, you guys need to get some better test equipment.
Take a softrock 6 and set it up for the IF of your RX and see a real display. ($14 kit)
that is not much better than a magic eye.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2006, 03:40:30 PM » |
|
$14 kit + $300-500 computer + cost of the receiver. Not really that cheap. But it will give a better display than the old panadaptor. Still, nothing is more cool than a magic eye.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11151
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2006, 04:02:10 PM » |
|
SP600 will work fine as a front end. And if you are here you have a pakuter.
So all it takes is the massive $14 investment and a few hours snorting flux
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
n3lrx
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2006, 04:52:52 PM » |
|
Steve uses one of those 'other' puters tho.. hehe I don't see any software that has 'evolved' to work with that 'other' computer.
Steve, how far are you from Blowie? I'll give you a computer w/USB that you can run at least Weirdos 2K on. There's also a source package there for the software so it may even be compilable on Linux, I'll have a look see at home.
In any event 'if' it's just straight 'C' it probably can. In which case it may be easily ported to Darwin. If it can be ported to Darwin I'll see if I can get a copy running on my G3 OSX.3.9.. No promises but I'll try, I know a little C but I'm no pro!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ed-VA3ES
Member
Offline
Posts: 592
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2006, 05:28:22 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"There ain't a slaw-bukit inna worl, that kin jam me!!"
|
|
|
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 8098
CQ CQ CONTEST
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2006, 05:35:40 PM » |
|
Here ya go Frank; a real panadapter screen shot:  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
|
|
|
|
n3lrx
Guest
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2006, 06:22:15 PM » |
|
Sorry Steve,
It looks like it's written in Visual Basic or Visual C. Also has too many Windows dependencies so chances of it working on a Mac are next to nil. Flex-Radio required to use the SoftRock does not provide the source. Not to mention the damn thing needs MS .Net Framework.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11151
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2006, 07:52:43 PM » |
|
Pete,
I don't care for the SDR1K software because it takes about 60 meg of billware for it to function. I prefer I2PHD software. download and run.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 8098
CQ CQ CONTEST
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2006, 07:59:20 PM » |
|
Pete,
I don't care for the SDR1K software because it takes about 60 meg of billware for it to function. I prefer I2PHD software. download and run.
True, but I'm already running an SDR-1000. The point was not so much the software but the screen quality difference between an old panadapter screen and some of the new stuff on the market. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2006, 09:39:32 AM » |
|
If it was all about the latest and greatest, none of us would have a radio more than a year old.
Randy: supposedly Flex is working on a Linux version of there software. I would think that would be the one to port to Darwin/OSX. I would imagine it could be run under X11 on OSX too.
Gonna spring for a cheapie XP machine. Which brings me back to my original point about cost. Doesn't matter if you already have a computer or not. It's still money spent to make the system work. Fourteen dollars is a fantasy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11151
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2006, 10:44:50 AM » |
|
Huz,
I have a 1GHz machine in the shack with 500 meg of ram. I think I paid $200 for it.
Stock Dell sound card works fine. also have a machine for doing switcher cad right near by. No kids games of internet crap. No fear of outside worms or diseases.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Steve - WB3HUZ
Guest
|
|
« Reply #13 on: November 28, 2006, 01:18:01 PM » |
|
Good move. No internet means almost zero security problems. I don't have a computer in the radio room. I did have in in years past that served as a digital version of a cart machine. Will need to get one in there soon to play with the SDR stuff. Huz,
I have a 1GHz machine in the shack with 500 meg of ram. I think I paid $200 for it.
Stock Dell sound card works fine. also have a machine for doing switcher cad right near by. No kids games of internet crap. No fear of outside worms or diseases.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Blaine N1GTU
Administrator
Member
Offline
Posts: 385
|
|
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2006, 06:42:44 PM » |
|
$20 and a handfull of computer parts...  I am really enjoying the flex radio, great receiver. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kf6pqt
Member
Offline
Posts: 530
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 02, 2006, 12:32:47 PM » |
|
Do they still make that softrock kit?
Thanks,
Jason kf6pqt
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
W6IEE, formerly KF6PQT
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11151
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 02, 2006, 01:00:40 PM » |
|
Yes they are up to softrock 6 and 7. I built a 6 and have a 7.
I like the 6 design better. Very nice stuff. I suggest you check each resistor value because the colors are hard to see even under a microscope. red and org very close. I made my own BB transformer because not crazy about Tony's design but it does work. fc
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kf6pqt
Member
Offline
Posts: 530
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 03, 2006, 12:14:43 PM » |
|
Link?
Thanks,
J
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
W6IEE, formerly KF6PQT
|
|
|
|
