The AM Forum
May 16, 2024, 08:59:24 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: How much would you pay for a 100w, 2002, 450w transmitter today?  (Read 8508 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2592


Bap!


WWW
« on: March 15, 2010, 09:02:29 PM »

I was looking through the 1952 Radio Amateur's Handbook, and went to the catalog section in the back.

It was very interesting to look at the prices of things in 1952, and then readjust those prices for 2010.

For instance, a Viking I *kit* (without the VFO) LESS tubes, crystals, key and mic cost $209.50 in 1952, adjusted for inflation (see http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl for the inflation calculator) a Viking I would cost $1713.05.  Would YOU pay that much for a 100 watt transmitter without tubes and a VFO?

Ok, how about the 32V3 - around $700 in 1952 - that would be an outstanding $5700 (more or less!).  Ok, that's just rediculous!

Globe kings were around $400 to $450 or $3679 here in 2010.

Very, very interesting !

Regards,

Steve
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
W8EJO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 552



« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2010, 09:11:36 PM »

Thank God for advancing technology, free markets/free trade & competition.

Isn't it amazing how prices come down (in any market sector) when these factors are present.
Logged

Terry, W8EJO

Freedom and liberty - extremist ideas since 1776.
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2632



« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2010, 09:26:12 PM »

Steve

You have pointed out the very reason why I couldn't afford a Viking I when I was first licensed in '52.  It was a choice between getting a Viking I and paying for my first year at college.  I thought going to college was a better choice.

I'm still looking for a Viking I as "fondling material."

Thanks for the perspective

Al
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2010, 09:36:35 PM »

us poor kids learned to homebrew
Logged
Ed/KB1HYS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1848



« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2010, 09:44:40 PM »

yea but the latest offerings from Yeacomwood are all in that price range. A brand New 3K rig is not unusual at all.  

The Flex-5000 is a 100w rig and is expensive too ($3500) (Plus you need to buy a PC to run it so add another 1200 or so) which is more pricey that the Viker adjusted for 2010 dollarettes, and even beyond the Collins.

And you still get no tubes or VFO...  Wink
Logged

73 de Ed/KB1HYS
Happiness is Hot Tubes, Cold 807's, and warm room filling AM Sound.
 "I've spent three quarters of my life trying to figure out how to do a $50 job for $.50, the rest I spent trying to come up with the $0.50" - D. Gingery
KF1Z
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1796


Are FETs supposed to glow like that?


« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2010, 09:47:12 PM »


I'm still looking for a Viking I as "fondling material."

Al

Here you go Al....
 Shocked


* 9771.jpg (73.18 KB, 314x798 - viewed 572 times.)
Logged

w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2632



« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2010, 09:59:24 PM »

us poor kids learned to homebrew

Yep!!  Or buy really OLD gear.  Been there done both.  The Eldico TR-1 morphed into my HV 500 watt PP 813 HB xmtr.  The TR-1 followed me around throughout my college years and became the HB rig
Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2632



« Reply #7 on: March 15, 2010, 10:00:47 PM »


I'm still looking for a Viking I as "fondling material."

Al

Here you go Al....
 Shocked

ARGHHH!!  I'm trying to expunge that image from my mind.  OW OW OW Grin
Logged
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2814



WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2010, 11:38:07 PM »

one way i have of looking at it is, yes the gear 60 years ago was a lot less sophisticated but most of it was really built  Even the relatively cheap stuff runs rings around the build quality of contemporary equipment.   Example:  the Johnson KW Matchbox I got.  in 2008 dollars (latest conversion available) it would cost over $1000 new.  But the way it was built is not found in modern tuners even the expensive ones.  I wonder if an Elecraft rig will still be in use in 60 years the way a lot of 32V and 75A  rigs are now.  I won't be around to find out but I bet not. 
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654



« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2010, 11:59:52 PM »

$1500 if the thing sat on the table. Did not make fan noise and did full legal limit AM.  Smiley

C
Logged
W3RSW
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3307


Rick & "Roosevelt"


« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2010, 11:02:40 AM »

In my mind I simply divide all current prices by 10 and call the result 'old dollars.' My father probably did the same. He and his father probably looked at real gold coins daily before they were declared illegal.

Drives my wife nuts but makes me feel a little better, especially in restaurants. Just like the history I learned, a lot of my values were established before Carter (the most recent years of US 'hyperinflation) and the modern era.

Quote
a Viking I would cost $1713.05.  Would YOU pay that much for a 100 watt transmitter without tubes and a VFO?

So the answer is 'yes' if the Viker and similar ilk were the state of the art now. Nothing else would be out there..    just inflation of the dollar since Ben Franklin's time.  So it was it Aegypt, Rome, France and England.  So shall it be always. Inflation is the most insidious tax placed on enterprise by monolopolistic governments.  Another reason why 'innocent, non-political' ham topics become contentious.

Most all such are intertwined in even the most innocent of questions, even to such esoterica as nomenclature of the planets, witness the singular demotion of Pluto from a planet to as yet undetermined status by simply voting at an IAU conference, not by science..
Logged

RICK  *W3RSW*
ka3zlr
Guest
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2010, 11:55:31 AM »


If I had my Druthers I'd like to do another K-2 with all the trimmings. Smiley
those are fun.

73
Jack
Logged
W3RSW
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3307


Rick & "Roosevelt"


« Reply #12 on: March 17, 2010, 11:08:42 AM »

Yeah "Cactus"; I've secretly been looking at the K3 too.
Can always run AM into an HB linear.
(I miss the earlier Heaths too.)

Of course now it's more than $1500, unless you stick with 10 watts in the basic rig.
Logged

RICK  *W3RSW*
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3654



« Reply #13 on: March 17, 2010, 12:45:40 PM »

plus, It sounds like hell.

C
Logged
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10037



« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2010, 01:46:13 PM »

My main homebrew transmitter is crammed full of components that were top of the line commercial grade in their day, that few depression-era hams could have come anywhere close to affording.  But I got most of them for next to nothing in the 60's-70's if not free of charge, because someone else no longer wanted them or considered them worth anything.

To have built the same exact transmitter I am using to-day in the 30's through the WW2 era when most of the parts were made, would undoubtedly have cost the equivalent of $30-60K in 2010 dollarettes.

Use the K-3 as an rf carrier exciter to drive a plate modulated rig or a dedicated solid state AM transmitter.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
W3RSW
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3307


Rick & "Roosevelt"


« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2010, 11:02:12 AM »

That's what I do with my TR-7 now Don.  Use it as a 10 to 15 watt RF feed into the 813's Class C.  Modulate them with outboard 572B's, PA amp. etc.

Guess I'll have to look back through the threads ; the K3's AM performance must have been critiqued.  Seems to be the problem with some of the similar rigs; you can EQ the AF receive output all you want but the transmit AM is restricted to 6kc by design and very hard to modify.
Logged

RICK  *W3RSW*
ka3zlr
Guest
« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2010, 11:06:59 AM »

Yeah "Cactus"; I've secretly been looking at the K3 too.
Can always run AM into an HB linear.
(I miss the earlier Heaths too.)

Of course now it's more than $1500, unless you stick with 10 watts in the basic rig.


Hi Rick,

It's a Killer these prices, But I'd still like to though XYL says I should sell some stuff...

73
Jack.
Logged
nq5t
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 556



« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2010, 01:08:12 PM »

plus, It sounds like hell.

C

Blame the fat fingered user, not the radio.  Any modern radio can be made to sound as bad as a stock Valiant :-)

Grant/NQ5T
Logged
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5047


« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2010, 04:04:05 PM »


I'm still looking for a Viking I as "fondling material."

Al

Here you go Al....
 Shocked

ARGHHH!!  I'm trying to expunge that image from my mind.  OW OW OW Grin

I think she's from a Woody Allen movie

Fred
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.06 seconds with 18 queries.