k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member
Offline
Posts: 10037
|
|
« on: October 15, 2005, 01:06:18 PM » |
|
Two interesting articles appear in this weeks ARRL LETTER:
ARRL CALLS ON FCC TO SHUT DOWN VIRGINIA BPL SYSTEM
In support of Amateur Radio complaints of interference, the ARRL this week formally asked the FCC to instruct the City of Manassas, Virginia, to shut down its broadband over power line (BPL) system. Communication Technologies (COMTek) operates the BPL system over the municipally owned electric power grid. The League says the facility has been the target of interference complaints, none of which has resulted "in any action or even interest" on the part of the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) staff. In the meantime, the ARRL says, interference to local Amateur Radio stations continues.
"The Manassas system currently causes harmful interference, and it is not compliant with applicable FCC Part 15 regulations, including Section 15.5," the ARRL said in a 16-page filing to the OET and the FCC's Enforcement Bureau. "Whatever actions either Manassas Power or Communication Technologies Inc might have taken to relieve the problem have not been successful, and it persists to the present time. This is precisely the situation in which the system must be shut down, pending successful resolution of the severe interference."
Two years ago, the ARRL put Manassas officials on notice that the League would act on behalf of its members to ensure full compliance with FCC regulations once the city's BPL system, then in the trial stage, started up.
The ARRL and the complaining Manassas radio amateurs--George Tarnovsky, K4GVT, Donald Blasdell, W4HJL, and William South, N3OH--cite interference so severe that "no communications can be conducted in the amateur allocations subject to interference," said the ARRL, which accused the city of "stonewalling in the face of repeated complaints."
"The parties cannot be said to be working this out cooperatively, since the City of Manassas and its BPL operator are currently in full denial," the League said.
Correspondence and reports from Tarnovsky, Blasdell and South outlining repeated contacts with the BPL operator and a lack of effective resolution--and even public denial--of the interference, accompanied the League's filing. All three hams suggested city officials and COMTek have not acted in good faith in addressing the interference. Efforts by the BPL operator to "notch" band segments have proven ineffective. "Our continued monitoring of the Manassas BPL system has shown they continuously open the notches and/or increase signal levels, subsequently interfering with licensed services again," Tarnovsky asserted. "This can only lead to one conclusion--they are not taking the interference issue seriously."
Field tests conducted not only by Manassas radio amateurs but by the US Department of the Navy established that the city's BPL system "was an interference generator at distances of hundreds of feet from the modems on overhead power lines," the ARRL wrote.
The FCC adopted new Part 15 rules to govern BPL deployment a year ago this week. Manassas earlier this month formally inaugurated its citywide deployment of the high-speed Internet BPL system, which it touts as "the first large-scale commercial BPL deployment in North America." The city receives a portion of BPL subscriber revenues to offset its costs of installing and maintaining the system.
A copy of the League's filing to the FCC is available on the ARRL Web site <http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/filings/Manassas-BPL-complaint-10-05. pdf>.
Additional information about BPL and Amateur Radio is on the ARRL Web site <http://www.arrl.org/bpl/>.
To support the League's efforts in this area, visit the ARRL's secure BPL Web site <https://www.arrl.org/forms/development/donations/bpl/>.
ARRL OBJECTS TO BPL DATABASE ACCESS LIMITS
The new Broadband over Power Line (BPL) Interference Resolution Web site provided by the United Power Line Council (UPLC) and the United Telecom Council (UTC) now is open <http://www.bpldatabase.org/>. But the ARRL has taken strong exception to limitations the site's administrator, UTC, appears to be imposing on the number of allowable licensee searches. A note on the Web site cautions that each licensee "is allowed to search a limited number of times each month" and advises them not to conduct random database searches lest their access to the database be further restricted. ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, said the provision is inappropriate and the database fails to meet the letter or spirit of the Part 15 BPL rules.
"This notice is totally unacceptable to the ARRL and should be equally unacceptable to the Commission," Sumner said October 14 in a letter to FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Acting Chief Bruce A. Franca. Sumner noted that the new Part 15 rules speak of a "publicly available" and "publicly accessible" database. "It is unacceptable for the database operator to attempt to discourage the public from making full use of the database by threatening to ration access," he asserted.
The FCC this week formally announced its designation of UTC as the Access BPL database manager as mandated under Part 15 regulations governing BPL that the Commission adopted one year ago today. The regulations spell out specific interference-mitigation requirements for BPL systems and mandate the new "BPL notification" database. The database is designed to provide information for FCC licensees to contact BPL system operators in the event of harmful interference a system may be generating.
Part 15 requires the database to include the name of the Access BPL provider; frequencies of operation; postal ZIP codes served by the specific BPL operation; the manufacturer and type of equipment and its associated FCC ID number; contact information, including both phone number and e-mail address of a person to facilitate the resolution of interference complaints, and the proposed and/or actual date of Access BPL operation. BPL operators have until November 19 to comply.
Sumner also said that requiring users to enter a ZIP code before gaining access to the database "is clearly contrary" to the requirement that the database be available to the public. "All of this information must be accessible and available to the public without having to enter a ZIP code," he contended. "The ZIP code is simply one element in the database, not the basis on which access to the remaining information may be restricted. There can be no restriction to the public's access to any of the information contained in the database."
FCC rules require that BPL system operators supply information for the database no later than 30 days prior to initiation of service. The information must be available to the public no more than three business days later. Sumner argues that making the database searchable only on the basis of ZIP code conflicts with the advance notification requirement.
"This advance notice is required so that licensees may document the radio frequency environment prior to activation of the BPL system," Sumner said. "For the information to be available only in response to the entry of a ZIP code renders the advance notice requirement meaningless and blocks the achievement of the objectives for advance notice" spelled out in the FCC's October 14, 2004, BPL Report and Order.
Sumner said the inadequacy of the ZIP code requirement is further illustrated if a user happens to enter a ZIP code that apparently does not match the database. This yields the message "No BPL Operations Found in Your Area." It also directs users to contact the UPLC, providing written details concerning the nature of any interference and of the user's licensed operations, including location, frequencies, type of operation and a brief description of the interference.
"This, too, is unacceptable," Sumner wrote. "UTC apparently intends to restrict the availability of information to the public according to its own definition of 'need to know.'" He said no FCC licensee or other radio user is obligated to share such information with a third party, "and most certainly not as a condition of access to information that is required by FCC regulations to be available to the public."
Sumner called on Franca to immediately inform UTC to revise and correct its BPL database system and bring it into full compliance with Part 15 no later than November 19.
Because ARRL is operating a Motorola Powerline LV BPL system at W1AW in cooperation with the manufacturer, the League is a BPL operator under Part 15. The ARRL has requested a user name and password for administrative access to the database.
Material from The ARRL Letter may be republished or reproduced in whole or in part in any form without additional permission. Credit must be given to The ARRL Letter and The American Radio Relay League.
|