The AM Forum
December 03, 2024, 06:42:44 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 [4]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Balanced linked tuner turns ratio  (Read 18847 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
AMLOVER
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 151


« Reply #75 on: October 01, 2024, 07:33:42 AM »

as the handbook text posted above says, as a first approximation use the LC values of the transmitter plate tank.

the 160M B&W balanced (for push-pull PA) coils are 94 uH and resonate at the bottom of 160 with 90 pF. The handbook recommendation is that the LC tuner tank resonates at 80% of the intended operating frequencies so max of 100-120 pF would be used in a parallel-feed balanced link tuner for 160 using the B&W hdvl or tvl coils depending on power. From what Stefanos is seeing at the input end of his ladder line he should use the parallel configuration.

and make the link variable to dispense with the capacitor on the link side.

94uH inductance is much but logic for a 160m final PA which can vary from 1000-10000 Ohm depending on plate voltage to current, Q of the tuning network and working class. When the impedance, as in my case, is considerably low the inductance in conjuction with the proper capacitance can be much smaller.

Logged
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 706


« Reply #76 on: October 01, 2024, 05:58:34 PM »

This is sort of a work in process. I found it interesting to look at the linked coupling transformer modeled as its "conductively coupled equivalent circuit". The results for a simple impedance matching system are interesting. More to follow while digging deeper.

Added the interactive Smith chart tuning tool which was the motivation in using the T equivalent transformer arrangement. The added pages now become more realistic You could embellish all this with parasitic components if desired. This is now version ONE. 

Logged
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 706


« Reply #77 on: October 01, 2024, 08:29:16 PM »

Used the tune feature in the Smith chart tool with the ideas presented in the paper pdf and constraining to values close to those discussed in the thread. However, kept the k factor realistic at k ~ 0.5. There is an asset in using the series cap input in order to achieve a reasonable response for small k factor.



* Forum_tuned.jpg (840.29 KB, 1364x608 - viewed 66 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 168


« Reply #78 on: October 02, 2024, 05:24:27 AM »

5.5'' and 7'' are the diameters from center to center of the 3/8'' tubes. The dimensions are 21.2'' for the 34 turns coil and 2.1'' for the 4 turns link coil.

Stefano,
From your link coil dimensions, 4 turn link coil= 3.73uh, 34 turn coil= 37uh, k=.9
Circuit L is the feed point impedance vs frequency of a modeled centered fed 160 meter dipole at 100 feet, with an overall length of 247 feet of #12 copper wire, sweep from 1.8 MHz to 2 MHz. T1 is a 1/8 wavelength at 1.9mhz of 600 ohm line.  The antenna can be match to 50 ohms across the 160 meter band.  Shown are the values of C1 and C2 for matching at 1.8, 1.9 and 2Mhz.  


* image LINK MATCH 160M Circuit 1.8Mhz 10_1_25.jpeg (492.16 KB, 3383x1692 - viewed 44 times.)

* image LINK MATCH 160M Smith 1.8Mhz 10_1_24.jpeg (901.09 KB, 3267x3267 - viewed 59 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 168


« Reply #79 on: October 02, 2024, 05:28:26 AM »

Match 1.9 MHz


* image LINK MATCH 160M Circuit 1.9 Mhz 10_1_24.jpeg (494.51 KB, 3383x1692 - viewed 49 times.)

* image LINK MATCH 160M Smith 1.9Mhz 10_1_24.jpeg (907.46 KB, 3267x3267 - viewed 37 times.)
Logged
ka1bwo
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 168


« Reply #80 on: October 02, 2024, 05:31:20 AM »

Match 2Mhz


* image LINK MATCH 160M Circuit 2Mhz 10_1_24.jpeg (490.41 KB, 3383x1692 - viewed 48 times.)

* image LINK MATCH 160M Smith 2Mhz 10_1_24.jpeg (918.35 KB, 3267x3267 - viewed 41 times.)
Logged
DMOD
AC0OB - A Place where Thermionic Emitters Rule!
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1806


« Reply #81 on: October 02, 2024, 07:23:52 PM »

Simulations and S graphs are nice but I think what experimenters really need and want are real schematics and component values.

Phil-AC0OB
Logged

Charlie Eppes: Dad would be so happy if we married a doctor.
Don Eppes: Yeah, well, Dad would be happy if I married someone with a pulse.NUMB3RS   Smiley
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 450


« Reply #82 on: October 02, 2024, 10:02:38 PM »

Hello to all.

Below are component values for the 160 meter (1.8 MHz) link antenna tuner calculated for a 600 ohm feedline.  

Because this link input coil (connected to the transceiver or transmitter) is fixed (cannot be tuned) you need to add a variable capacitor in series with this coil to achieve input tuning flexibility.  This variable capacitor can be connected ahead or after the inductor.  If it is after the coil then is is connected to ground. If it is placed in front of the coil then the coil is grounded.  Some times it can be placed in parallel with the input inductor.  Each antenna farm is unique and testing of the input variable capacitor placement is required to determine it's electrical location.

INPUT components:

1. Input link capacitor value is 1768 pf.  A variable 300 - 500 pf capacitor with added (padded) home brew or commercial capacitors in parallel will get you up to the 2500 plus pf range.

2. Input link coil is calculated at 4.4 uH.

OUTPUT components.

SERIES circuit configuration:

1. Total inductance is 106 uh.  

2. Total capacitance is 74 pf.  Use a 150 pf variable capacitor.

PARALLEL circuit configuration:

1. Total inductance is 27 uH.

2. Total capacitance is 295 pf.  Use a 500 or 600 pf variable capacitor.  

If the total antenna system length is a multiple of 1/8th wavelengths instead of the desired multiples of 1/4 wavelengths then you may need to connect a capacitor or an inductor to the left and rights sides of the transmission line at the output of the tuner.  This is called a shunt capacitor or a shunt inductor.    

1. The shunt capacitor is calculated at 147 pf.  Use a 300 pf variable capacitor.  

2. The shunt inductor is calculated at 53 uH.  Make this inductor variable with taps.

Above components with less challenging values can be achieved with a 300 ohm transmission line.  The 300 ohm transmission line also lowers the high voltages encountered at the antenna coupler in the parallel configuration which is dependent upon total antenna system electrical length.  Lowering these voltages helps prevent high voltage induced arcing of the capacitors.  

73,
Chuck
Logged
AMLOVER
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 151


« Reply #83 on: October 03, 2024, 04:55:03 AM »

PARALLEL circuit configuration:

1. Total inductance is 27 uH.

2. Total capacitance is 295 pf.  Use a 500 or 600 pf variable capacitor. 

If the total antenna system length is a multiple of 1/8th wavelengths instead of the desired multiples of 1/4 wavelengths then you may need to connect a capacitor or an inductor to the left and rights sides of the transmission line at the output of the tuner.  This is called a shunt capacitor or a shunt inductor.   

1. The shunt capacitor is calculated at 147 pf.  Use a 300 pf variable capacitor. 

2. The shunt inductor is calculated at 53 uH.  Make this inductor variable with taps.


I am exactly on Chuck's road. If I am lucky and this is the value I'll need then I have doorknobs 150pf few Kvars, I have also increased the link coil inductance by bringing the turns much closer each other. 
Logged
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 450


« Reply #84 on: October 03, 2024, 07:12:36 AM »

I will see if I can re-calculate the output series components using capacitors instead of inductors.  This may make it easier for component selection.  Give me a little time to crunch the numbers.

It is VERY important to utilize the input variable capacitor.  You need four tires to operate your car efficiently and the same goes for the link antenna coupler regarding this input variable capacitor.

1. Try not to use door knob capacitors.  They can heat up and turn the tuner into a microwave oven.  Fixed home brew plate capacitors work much better; they run cool.

2. Be careful when decreasing the spacing of the coil windings.  This increases inner winding capacitance and some times messes things up.

The output windings work well when spacing is the diameter of the wire or tubing in use.

If possible, use 1/4 inch or 3/8 copper tubing or flat copper stock to make parallel 300 ohm open wire feeders.  It may be possible to make a four wire open wire feeder that uses smaller wire to accomplish the preferred 300 ohm impedance for open wire feeders.

73,
Chuck  
Logged
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 706


« Reply #85 on: October 03, 2024, 09:08:47 PM »

Hi Stefano,

Given your current link coupled physical configuration per your prior pictures, would recommend you take a measurement of the coupling value, k. This significantly drives the possible solutions and component values of the tuner. Some of this can be accommodated by the series C on the link side. However,   knowing in advance what k is  possible helps target a closer set of all component values.
Logged
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 706


« Reply #86 on: October 06, 2024, 08:34:54 PM »

Here is an Excel SS. Not fancy, but seems to correlate well with measurements on push pull link coupled tanks that I have constructed in the past. Any issues, please let me know.


Logged
WA4WAX
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 427


« Reply #87 on: October 07, 2024, 03:25:11 PM »

See article by O J Russell.  Good luck.

https://www.worldradiohistory.com/UK/Practical-Wireless/50s/PW-1955-08.pdf
Logged
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 706


« Reply #88 on: October 08, 2024, 11:38:50 AM »


Excellent and thanks. Another is:

https://www.worldradiohistory.com/Archive-Electronics/50s/Electronics-1952-05.pdf

W. Bruene from Collins Radio had some nice pieces on the subject.
73'
Logged
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 450


« Reply #89 on: October 13, 2024, 02:57:50 PM »

Attached are two pictures of two circuits for tuning the link antenna coupler in series or current feed as it is sometimes called.

The inductor and capacitor values are calculated values to resonate the antenna system.  

The calculated capacitor values should be doubled for better antenna coupler tuning.

Example:

1. 74 pf should be doubled to approximately 150 pf.
2. 37 pf should be doubled to approximately 75 pf.

I should of added the input side of the link antenna tuner and not just the output side as shown in the two pictures.  Will make an update to the pictures to reflect the entire link antenna circuit, soon.

73,
Chuck



 


* IMG_1072.JPG (6661.28 KB, 4032x3024 - viewed 61 times.)

* IMG_1070.JPG (6744.78 KB, 4032x3024 - viewed 64 times.)
Logged
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 450


« Reply #90 on: October 13, 2024, 03:01:55 PM »

W4AMV,

Thank you for posting those good articles.

73,
Chuck
Logged
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8301



WWW
« Reply #91 on: October 14, 2024, 10:08:34 PM »

Phil, Joe, Steve, Chuck and all,

I fixed my problem with attachments. My photos archives were jpeg and I had to transform them to jpg.
I hope this time to get attached.
The main inductor is 34 turns 1/8'' spacing 3/8'' copper tube on a 5.5" pvc form and the link coil is 4 turns 3/8'' spacing 3/8'' copper tube on a 7'' form.
Due to dog house small dimensions I can't get any bigger. In any case I'll adjust OWL or antenna length to get the most efficient taping.
Plenty of taps for experimenting tunings.

This thing is beautiful!
Could you please show pictures of how the coil taps are made to the tubing, with the wing nuts and all. That is, are they screws which are soldered, or something else? I've never seen anything like it.
Logged

Radio Candelstein
AMLOVER
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 151


« Reply #92 on: October 15, 2024, 07:50:22 PM »

Hi Patrick,

First stage.

The copper tube was first winded around the PVC form 5'' diameter.
The copper turns were winded very closed together without any space between them in the begining.
It is easy to distant them later but very dificult to bring them close back together if for some reason they get further then should be.
The black teflon spacer tube turns were winded in between the copper turns and they will create the right distance 1/4''.
Copper tube turns are fastened on the PVC form with few 1/2'' long inox 'memory' screws to create a model for the turns right position in order to rewind them later in the same exactly position.
Two lines are made by pen and so the wholes will be drilled in a straight line.
The copper tube is drilled only on its upper side and the male part of the bronze spacers are screwed into the wholes to stay stable for later soldering.
Those exagon bronze spacers are 3/4'' long with one male and one female side like the ones we use to keep PCBs higher of the sassis in our constructions.
The copper tube is 3/8'' and the male part of the bronze spacer is shorter, just 1/4'' long.

Second stage.

The inox 'memory' screws which fastened the copper tube turns in place are unscrewed and the inductor gets free to move away from the PVC form.
With the inductor away from the PVC form is time for soldering the bronze spacers on the copper tube turns with the boutane gun.
When everything is soldered in place and the copper is cool, gets a good cleaning from dirts and is painted with some primer and a final satin grey color.
2 hours later the inductor is dried and repositioned back on the PVC form.
It has to be fastened in the same place as before by using the 'memory' inox screws screwed back in their predrilled wholes.
The black teflon spacer tube will be rewinded back on the end and that's all. This spacer tube could also left away but is important to form the right space in the first stage.
In the female part on the top of the bronze spacers are screwed male 'butterfly' screws to fasten the OWL edges easily by hands.

Very soon the tuner will be ready and make few measurements/tests before real antenna is connected.
More photos will come soon.

Stefano

 


* coil nuts.jpg (151.55 KB, 2083x1111 - viewed 67 times.)
Logged
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 706


« Reply #93 on: October 18, 2024, 12:11:25 PM »

Hi Chuck. I set up the circuit shown as the series tuned inductor pair, the circuit of picture # 2. Assume that the topology I provide is correct and the primary (link) is the Q = 1 at 1.85 MHz, the swept responses for coupling coefficient, k, are attached. It is interesting to note how significant the k value shifts center frequency and the quality of the match. This is a "sensitive" configuration. Perhaps a series C on the link is warranted. A swinging link is also a possible solution. This sweep at k = 0.45, the next is swept k.


* fixed_coupling_k.jpg (741.56 KB, 1366x611 - viewed 50 times.)
Logged
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 706


« Reply #94 on: October 18, 2024, 12:13:00 PM »

The swept k response. The k at ~ 0.4 to 0.5 is best. Smaller and greater produces a degradation.


* vary_coupling_k.jpg (820.27 KB, 1365x609 - viewed 47 times.)
Logged
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 450


« Reply #95 on: October 18, 2024, 02:21:28 PM »

Alan,

You are correct.  The variable input capacitor to the link coil is needed. It is part of the design.  And, this input variable capacitor arrangement, in the past, performed better than a swinging link coil by itself.

Thank you for the nice pics of your work.

I should mention:

1. Try not to put any physical material between the coil windings.  This degrades the air dielectric.

2. An exception to this are some fiberglass products like G-10 FR4.  

I still need to upload pics of the complete link antenna tuner circuit
and not just the output section that I uploaded earlier.

73,
Chuck




Logged
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 706


« Reply #96 on: October 18, 2024, 10:02:28 PM »

Yes Chuck. I tried 2 cases. A k of 0.3 and a k of 0.65. A reasonable variation which I was able to adjust for a SWR of less 1.2:1 by adjustment of the series C with the link. Only a small change was required in the resonating capacitor value. That range in k required the
variable cap in series with the link to shift 3:1 in value. Of course the k is fixed in any construction. A more important result is what range in balanced termination Z can be accommodated by the series link tuning and tapping position of the balanced inductor?   
Logged
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8301



WWW
« Reply #97 on: October 20, 2024, 12:22:31 AM »

Thank you Stefano, that is a very well-engineered method.
Logged

Radio Candelstein
Pages: 1 ... 3 [4]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.065 seconds with 19 queries.