The AM Forum
March 29, 2024, 10:04:47 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CURIOUS ABOUT FILAMENT CHOKES.  (Read 2439 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
KL7OF
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2313



« on: September 04, 2022, 08:18:39 PM »

In the few amplifiers I have built , I have always used a filament choke.  Some commercial, some homebrew chokes, never had a problem.  I have been looking at the Bill Orr #14 and there are several amp builds shown, 4-250, 4-1000, 450 TH and none use a filament choke..  This is 1956....  Just curious..
 
Logged
KD1SH
Member

Online Online

Posts: 739



« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2022, 09:05:22 PM »

Are those amps grounded-grid/filament-driven? Always figured the choke was required when you're applying RF drive to the filament. If grid driven, with the filament at RF ground through a cap, you wouldn't need a choke.

In the few amplifiers I have built , I have always used a filament choke.  Some commercial, some homebrew chokes, never had a problem.  I have been looking at the Bill Orr #14 and there are several amp builds shown, 4-250, 4-1000, 450 TH and none use a filament choke..  This is 1956....  Just curious..
 
Logged

"Gosh, Batman, I never knew there were no punctuation marks in alphabet soup!"
—Robin, in the 1960's Batman TV series.
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2648


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2022, 08:05:49 AM »

Grid driven doesn't require a choke.

Filament tubes that are cathode driven do.

I've seen guys use fils chokes on grid driven tubes before. Nive also seen guys riding wheelies through traffic at 515 at night.

--Shane
WP2ASS / ex KD6VXI
Logged
Detroit47
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 644



« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2022, 11:39:33 AM »

Hey Shane

How the heck are you.

47
Logged
KD1SH
Member

Online Online

Posts: 739



« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2022, 12:39:24 PM »

   I don't have Orr #14, but I do have #15 - one of my favorites - and it does feature both grid and filament driven amps. For the most part, the grid-driven amps don't use filament chokes, while the filament driven ones do, as expected. There is one interesting exception: a pair of 803 tetrodes with all grids grounded, and RF drive applied to the filaments through a center tap on the secondary of the filament transformer.
   Orr's explanation: "When operating in the 3.5 - 7 Mc. region it is entirely possible to apply the RF driving voltage directly to the filament circuit without the necessity of adding filament RF chokes to isolate the driving voltage from the filament transformer. This makes for circuit simplicity and lower initial cost. If this circuit is used with high frequency tubes such as the 813 and 7094, the use of filament chokes for operation above 7 Mc. is recommended."
   Interesting to note that he uses no input tuning, so even with the RF drive free to interact with the secondary of the filament transformer the input impedance must be close to 50 ohms. What's a bit counterintuitive to me is that I'd think that the reactance of the filament transformer to RF would increase as the frequency increased; thus making the filament transformer's presence even less notable above 7 Mc. Unless maybe he's concerned that the filament transformer's secondary might become self-resonant at higher frequencies?
Logged

"Gosh, Batman, I never knew there were no punctuation marks in alphabet soup!"
—Robin, in the 1960's Batman TV series.
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2648


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2022, 09:53:04 PM »

Hey Shane

How the heck are you.

47

I'm good.  Living the good life here in the Carribean!

Next year I should have towers and stuff here.  For now, a Ke wood 850 is all I have.


No amp, a single 40 to 10 vertical.

I sometimes here the 75 meter am guys, but they are really low.

--Shane
WP2ASS / ex KD6VXI
Logged
WB3JOK
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 637



« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2022, 07:48:04 AM »

What's a bit counterintuitive to me is that I'd think that the reactance of the filament transformer to RF would increase as the frequency increased; thus making the filament transformer's presence even less notable above 7 Mc. Unless maybe he's concerned that the filament transformer's secondary might become self-resonant at higher frequencies?

I think the capacitance to ground is the concern. There's an awful lot of copper and varnished paper layers and the core (and maybe an electrostatic shield) is at ground - sounds like a capacitor to me  Wink
Logged
KD1SH
Member

Online Online

Posts: 739



« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2022, 10:58:41 AM »

That makes sense, especially considering that this capacitance is a path to ground.

What's a bit counterintuitive to me is that I'd think that the reactance of the filament transformer to RF would increase as the frequency increased; thus making the filament transformer's presence even less notable above 7 Mc. Unless maybe he's concerned that the filament transformer's secondary might become self-resonant at higher frequencies?

I think the capacitance to ground is the concern. There's an awful lot of copper and varnished paper layers and the core (and maybe an electrostatic shield) is at ground - sounds like a capacitor to me  Wink
Logged

"Gosh, Batman, I never knew there were no punctuation marks in alphabet soup!"
—Robin, in the 1960's Batman TV series.
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2648


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2022, 06:21:17 AM »

There are low capacitance filament chokes.....  At least there used to be.

I used them, from Dahl, to run larger tetrode in GG and triode as well.

160A filament chokes where not easy to build in practice.  However, by mounting the filament xformer on Glastic standoffs and then putting a choke on the primary side of the xformer you could get away with just a few amps of filament choke!

Worked great.

--Shane
WP2ASS / ex KD6VXI
Logged
KD1SH
Member

Online Online

Posts: 739



« Reply #9 on: September 14, 2022, 01:11:53 PM »

   Intriguing idea. I'm going through the preliminaries of designing a 3-500Z three-holer. I've got plenty of the traditional bifilar-wound filament chokes, wound with 10 gauge enameled wire, but my experimentation shows that passing the total filament current - 45 amps - though a single choke results in one very hot choke. I could certainly use three chokes - one for each tube - but that takes up a lot of room in an already crowded box. Placing a couple of vastly smaller (and cheaper) chokes in the primary, with the core floated, sounds like an attractive option.
   My filament transformer reads 170uh from each side of the secondary to the center-tap, while the secondary to primary capacitance is 200pf. I'd want to experiment a bit to see if it's resonant anywhere.

There are low capacitance filament chokes.....  At least there used to be.

I used them, from Dahl, to run larger tetrode in GG and triode as well.

160A filament chokes where not easy to build in practice.  However, by mounting the filament xformer on Glastic standoffs and then putting a choke on the primary side of the xformer you could get away with just a few amps of filament choke!

Worked great.

--Shane
WP2ASS / ex KD6VXI
Logged

"Gosh, Batman, I never knew there were no punctuation marks in alphabet soup!"
—Robin, in the 1960's Batman TV series.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 18 queries.