The AM Forum
March 29, 2024, 05:07:38 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Center tap and two transformers in parallel  (Read 4580 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
n4joy
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 224



« on: January 18, 2020, 11:06:55 AM »

Hi.  I acquired two identical Hammond 278CX 800vct 535ma transformers for my 813 amp project that I would like to connect in parallel (both primaries and secondaries).  I am using a voltage doubler, so I want the extra overhead. The amp will be on a dedicated 125VAC 20 amp outlet.  What should I do with the center taps?  Should I connect the center taps and ground or just tape and leave aside?  Alternatively, I could connect the center taps and use for reduced output while tuning (hot switching with a 10a 250VDC SPDT switch).



Logged
DMOD
AC0OB - A Place where Thermionic Emitters Rule!
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1768


« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2020, 11:36:38 AM »

Hi.  I acquired two identical Hammond 278CX 800vct 535ma transformers for my 813 amp project that I would like to connect in parallel (both primaries and secondaries).  I am using a voltage doubler, so I want the extra overhead. The amp will be on a dedicated 125VAC 20 amp outlet.  What should I do with the center taps?  Should I connect the center taps and ground or just tape and leave aside?  Alternatively, I could connect the center taps and use for reduced output while tuning (hot switching with a 10a 250VDC SPDT switch).

What is the total plate voltage, current, and tube complement for your Amp?




Logged

Charlie Eppes: Dad would be so happy if we married a doctor.
Don Eppes: Yeah, well, Dad would be happy if I married someone with a pulse.NUMB3RS   Smiley
n4joy
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 224



« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2020, 11:42:09 AM »

The amp is a x2 813 grounded grid that I am building.  Using a voltage doubler, I am hoping to obtain around 2.2KV on the plates and running the two 535ma transformers in parallel would give me plenty of room.  I had planned to connect the primaries and secondaries in parallel.
Logged
ka1tdq
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1509


Red part turned in for a refund.


« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2020, 12:24:11 PM »

I would suggest putting the 120 volt primaries in parallel, as you planned anyway, and then placing the secondaries in series. You could then use a full wave bridge and not need to do a voltage doubler.

Either way you go, you'll need to make sure that the transformers are in phase. If you don't they could get destroyed when you apply power.

There's plenty of ways to ensure you have the connections right. I've placed the 120 volt primaries in parallel, but fed them with 6.3 VAC from another transformer. The reduced voltage makes sure nothing blows up. Then connect the secondaries in series. You should get double the voltage output. You'll need to do the math to figure out what that should be with only 6.3 VAC on the primary.

If you don't get what you expect, reverse the connections on the secondaries.

My 2 cents...

Jon
Logged

It’s not just values, it’s business.
w4bfs
W4 Beans For Supper
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1433


more inpoot often yields more outpoot


« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2020, 12:30:14 PM »

what is the specification on the center tapped secondary ... many older hv xfmrs require that the ct remain close to ground due to small amounts of insulation .... a hipot test will give the answer if the manufc'tr does not
Logged

Beefus

O would some power the gift give us
to see ourselves as others see us.
It would from many blunders free us.         Robert Burns
N4LTA
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1075


« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2020, 01:15:23 PM »

Hammond power transformers are rated for use with the full secondary  and a full wave bridge. I would think that using the secondaries of two transformers in series might cause a breakdown of the insulation.

Pat
N4LTA
Logged
KK4YY
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 565


Your best isn't as good as you can be.


« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2020, 08:55:08 PM »

I've used voltage doublers, but I don't favor them. Given the choice, I go with a FWB when possible. One way to do that, having two transformers, is to build a FWB and filter on each transformer then "stack" (connect in series) the DC voltages. This method eliminates any phasing issues and uses the same string of capacitors that a doubler would use... just a few more inexpensive diodes.

The Hammond transformers you're using have a Hi-Pot test of 2,000V RMS, so I think you're in the ballpark... but close.

All unused secondary connections should be well insulated from ground.


Don
Logged

All your worries won't add a day to your life, or make the ones you have any happier.
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8308



WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2020, 01:29:46 AM »

Also with a doubler, if you have to use it, give each transformer its own set of diodes so that the 'parallelled' secondaries will be isolated from each other just as with the bridge. Hammond winds to the exact turn number, but any small imbalance can still waste juice in a loop. hehe also give each one its own primary fuse.

If the thing is set up as shown, each cap is charged each half-cycle as opposed to one transformer into a doubler.



* double doubler.png (16.78 KB, 1132x475 - viewed 298 times.)
Logged

Radio Candelstein - Flagship Station of the NRK Radio Network.
WU2D
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1800


CW is just a narrower version of AM


« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2020, 10:13:50 PM »

A bit off the subject but I have used salvaged microwave transformers successfully in pairs for HV power supplies. I have a supply that handles my BC-191 and BC653 transmitters made from a pair with choke input and it has been bulletproof for 5 years now.

The issue with using these babies is that one of the HV output leads is actually tied to the frame of the transformer. They used a half wave shunt rectifier system in the old monster microwaves. So it is downright dangerous to use a bridge on them, even if you manage to disconnect the winding from the ground. The grounded winding is simply not designed to be at a high potential. The other thing I had to do was knock out the chunk of metal jammed into the winding that acts as a lossy element which tends to even out the load in the microwave.

So you use the grounded lead on each of the transformers as your grounded center tap and conventional full wave 2 diode, and all is well. Oh and make sure you use fairly identical transformers! The economy hookup is a no-no, again because it raises the windings above ground. But a grounded centertap with a bridge is fine for a HV bipolar supply.
Logged

These are the good old days of AM
W7TFO
WTF-OVER in 7 land Dennis
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2521


IN A TRIODE NO ONE CAN HEAR YOUR SCREEN


WWW
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2020, 02:52:51 AM »

E-mail sent.

73DG
Logged

Just pacing the Farady cage...
WZ1M
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 393


« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2020, 05:16:00 AM »

Also with a doubler, if you have to use it, give each transformer its own set of diodes so that the 'parallelled' secondaries will be isolated from each other just as with the bridge. Hammond winds to the exact turn number, but any small imbalance can still waste juice in a loop. hehe also give each one its own primary fuse.

If the thing is set up as shown, each cap is charged each half-cycle as opposed to one transformer into a doubler.

After being in the transformer rewind business for 25 plus years, even if its the same manufacturer and same model number, turns ratios can be different. I experienced this with Stancor, Hammond, and others. For instance, the Collins 516F2 power transformer...I have run across three transformers with the same part number on the endbell but totally different windings.
Regards,
Gary
Logged
KK4YY
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 565


Your best isn't as good as you can be.


« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2020, 07:20:12 AM »

In my younger days I worked for a transformer manufacturer, a small outfit. To save time, their "Chief Engineer" would have us stack EI laminations three at a time instead of interleaving each layer. He also carried a fountain pen which he would use to scrawl illegible notes on the work orders. A fountain pen... in the 1980's, not the 1880's. He was a real dandy.

As I recall, he also wore a bow tie.  Roll Eyes
Logged

All your worries won't add a day to your life, or make the ones you have any happier.
W2JBL
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 676


« Reply #12 on: January 27, 2020, 08:02:36 PM »

I know this is off topic but I'm curious if the profile picture for N4JOY is that of a Lettine 130 HF transmitter. I have one and it was my first plate modulated AM rig. I have never found a schematic or any info on it. It's a 6L6 oscillator, pair of 807's in the PA, a pair in the modulator and a 6N7 speech amp, tansformer coupled. Power was from a pair of 866's. In my youth I butchered it pretty badly for use on 200 meters (Pirate Radio) and I'd like to get it back to original. 
Logged
n4joy
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 224



« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2020, 06:49:15 AM »

I know this is off topic but I'm curious if the profile picture for N4JOY is that of a Lettine 130 HF transmitter. I have one and it was my first plate modulated AM rig. I have never found a schematic or any info on it. It's a 6L6 oscillator, pair of 807's in the PA, a pair in the modulator and a 6N7 speech amp, tansformer coupled. Power was from a pair of 866's. In my youth I butchered it pretty badly for use on 200 meters (Pirate Radio) and I'd like to get it back to original. 

The profile pic is one of my Lettine 240s and not the rare 130s.  I have yet to find any documentation (other than an ad) on the 130.  I would love to get my hands on a schematic too!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 19 queries.