The AM Forum
March 29, 2024, 03:20:02 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The USB D-104 (very) Large Diaphragm Condenser Mic Project - Working! with pics  (Read 4647 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« on: March 17, 2019, 11:06:26 PM »

After quite a bit of fooling around, I finally got the USB D-104 Mic project working.

This is a D-104 Mic that will plug directly into a computer via USB.  Everything is self-contained within the microphone or base itself.

The computer recognizes the device as a  D-104 USB Microphone   Cool

The condenser element is a whopping 34mm, AKA 1.34 Inches in diameter.  So it's pretty big.  The capacitance of the mic element is approximately 50pF.

A big challenge was constructing an amplifier that would have a sufficiently high input impedance as to not load down the element.  I used a 1 gig ohm input resistor, looking into a j-fet with very low gate c (approx. 4pF).   The gain of this amplifier is approximately 40, and the amplifier is co-located within the head to keep stray C to a minimum.  The output voltage from the amplifier-element combination with very loud speech, close talked  is over 6V P-P.  This is excessive, and the normal output is about 1V P-P.

The element requires high voltage - much higher than 5V which is the USB voltage available.  So, a 5VDC to 24VDC converter is used to get sufficient voltage to run the element, and the associated analog circuitry.

In the base is further analog amplification, to bring the level from the head (with normal-loud speech) up to around 4V P-P for the input to the Analog to Digital converter, which is part of the microprocessor unit located in the base.  The microprocessor is a Microchip PIC which contains the A/D converter, hardware interface for USB and many other input/output combinations.  I wrote the software that runs on the microprocessor.

One of the pins on the chip is used to facilitate transmit/receive control from the switch in the mic handle.  When the switch is open (receive), the software in the microprocessor detects the T/R switch is open, and writes all zeroes (0s) to the USB data buffers.  This allows software to detect the presence of anything other than zeroes as a key to transmit/receive.  The mic otherwise behaves like a standard USB microphone.

I included a line level analog output for in-shack operation and direct connection to an audio console or other analog input.

Included in the head is material facilitating a pop filter thereby reducing breath pops, etc.  to a reasonable level.

Audio fidelity is excellent - Listening, I believe it is better than the Behringer B1 I usually use ! 

The element is unidirectional (which is what I wanted), so off-mic sounds are significantly reduced.

This is the 2nd USB D-104 Mic I've put together.  The other one uses a Radio Shack electret condenser element.

I like the look and feel of the D-104.  Maybe Bob Heil might be interested in producing something like this ?  Wink

Anyway, a challenging, but fun project.   Here are some pictures:


The base components


The head:


The cover with pop filter:


The overall system - with the mic plugged into a laptop, and actually transmitting via remote control to the transmitter:


Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
w8khk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1201


This ham got his ticket the old fashioned way.


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2019, 07:50:09 AM »

Very nice implementation, Steve!  I wonder if you will be providing additional information, such as the circuit, the code running on the PIC micro-controller, mic element ID and source vendor, etc.

I have been able to reach as high as 10 megohm input impedance with jfet input op-amps, such as the LF-353, but you have gone way beyond that for the ultimate low frequency response.  Having everything needed to interface to a PC in the microphone head and base is quite a feat.  Interesting that you avoided wiring capacitance in the neck of the mic stand by putting the pre-amplifier in the head.  Very nice!  Looking forward to additional information as time permits.  Thanks for sharing!
Logged

Rick / W8KHK  ex WB2HKX, WB4GNR
"Both politicians and diapers need to be changed often and for the same reason.”   Ronald Reagan

My smart?phone voicetext screws up homophones, but they are crystal clear from my 75 meter plate-modulated AM transmitter
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2019, 10:11:20 AM »

I am most impressed by the sophistiated mounting system for the condenser element!  Wink

That and the radical construction technique for the head preamp too!

But on a serious note, the price that such a mic would need to sell for would be not insignificant,
even built off shore... imho.


                              _-_-bear
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
WA2SQQ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1090


« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2019, 10:58:51 AM »

Got a few questions:
1. Will there be a kit / product offered?
2. Not clear - can this be used with an original D-104 element?

Definitely interested.
Logged
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2019, 11:37:00 AM »

I'm not QIX, but the upper part in the head is for the condensor element.
The bottom part converts to USB, that's the green board.
That is a different thing, and Steve did also put this same type of USB board in the base of his D-104 earlier...

Fwiw, I think the Chinese on epay are offering an audio to USB dongle thingie
for microphones...
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2019, 04:25:35 PM »

As Bear pointed out, there are easier ways to do this if you just want the D-104 to be a microphone, and interface to USB.  There are dongles and interfaces on Ebay that will do it.

These wouldn't work for my application because I wanted to use the PTT switch in the D104 to in fact control my transmitter via remote control and have everything come over a single USB input.  And, I wanted foolproof control.  This required a custom USB interface that would send 0s when the mic PTT switch was open.  I have found that simply disconnecting or shorting the output of the microphone was not sufficient.  The analog noise present in all mic preamps would generate enough signal to mock pauses in speech, so I could not absolutely know that the user indeed went to receive.

To answer some of the other questions:

Software:  The remote control software I use is available from my website: http://remham.radioassociates.com.    The firmware - I could make the firmware available.  You would have to have a way to program the PIC.  Or I could program the PIC.  The PIC side really needs work.  There are lots of possibilities here.

Mic Element:  I used this one --> https://www.ebay.com/itm/34mm-Large-Diaphragm-Microphone-Cartridge-Core-Recording-Condenser-Mic-Capsule/163425717306?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m2749.l2649

There are, no doubt, other (and possibly better) ways to do this.

But, it was/is an interesting project for sure.

Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2019, 05:13:03 PM »

The elements are available for less $$  on epay and with USA based shipping too!

Just picked up a pair! Cheesy
Not sure how I may use it, but...

Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
PA0NVD
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 615


Nico and Chappie (Chappie is the dog...)


« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2019, 06:30:12 PM »

I like you project very much. It does remind me at my days as a school practicant in the radio studios in the Netherlands more than 55 years ago. The NRU (Netherlands radio union) made their own studio condenser microphones. In those days, there was no metalized foil for the membrane, so they nickel plated SS and pealed off the nickel. Made nice membranes.
The microphone was connected to a resonance circuit of a  tube VHF oscillator with an FM detector that gave the audio, all build within the microphone. That were real studio quality microphones. The membrane was in the order of 1 1/2 inch
Great work Steve, it must have been a joyful way to spent you time. I like to try that as well, but without the digital part.
Logged
W2NBC
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 327



« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2019, 06:34:26 PM »

Steve-

I consider this project a multi-sided approach to modifying the ol' "D-104". Not only have you replaced the crystal element that are ALL getting old and replacements unobtainium, you have also interfaced it with USB/PTT.. Fantastic and nostalgic project!

A question:
Most large capsule condenser mics commercially offered that I've seen the guts of (too many), are suspension-mounted INSIDE the head. Not only that, but are also "hung" on external suspension mounts to reduce sub-sonic "handling" and vibration that they are capable of reproducing. All the D-104's that have been around here exhibit "handling" noises, loose head vibrations, etc. Have you noticed those artifacts?

Cool project.. Kudos!
Logged

Vintage Radio Pages- http://www.dealamerica.com
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2019, 04:21:12 AM »

During the first attempt, I suspended the element within the head.  I found this to be problematic, in that the suspension exhibited a certain degree of "springy-ness", and this translated to very low frequency artifacts being constantly present in the audio.

So, decided to go the other way - with a very solid, positive mechanical support.  This works quite a bit better, and the handling artifacts are very much reduced.

It's best of course if the mic stand is sitting on a table, but it's actually not bad if one holds the stand while transmitting.  I ran a lot of tests.

I have a 77-DX mic with from which the ribbon element was removed well before I got it.  This is an excellent candidate for one of these 34MM elements and I intend to do this project next.  Will not be USB - just an analog output.

The audio quality from these large elements is quite impressive !
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
KK4YY
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 565


Your best isn't as good as you can be.


« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2019, 07:58:35 AM »

I read an interesting article on the Neumann website regarding large vs small diaphragm condenser microphones. Apparently, size matters. Grin

https://www.neumann.com/homestudio/en/difference-between-large-and-small-diaphragm-microphones
Logged

All your worries won't add a day to your life, or make the ones you have any happier.
WD8BIL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4409


« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2019, 12:43:01 PM »

Quote
I am most impressed by the sophistiated mounting system for the condenser element!

Yes, the aviation clamp really set it off! Ya done gooder again, Mr. Steve. Grin
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.091 seconds with 19 queries.