Warning: Creating default object from empty value in /homepages/11/d132647312/htdocs/Amfone/mkportal/include/SMF/smf_out.php on line 47
PI network and RF output transformer ideas and questions




 
The AM Forum
October 18, 2018, 06:14:50 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: PI network and RF output transformer ideas and questions  (Read 313 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6927



WWW
« on: October 11, 2018, 11:19:47 PM »

Say for example a practical pi network is designed to match a tube to a 200 Ohm load instead of 50 Ohms and the transmitter covers 1.6 to 30MC.

Why not use a 2:1 turns ratio RF transformer in whatever form, to connect the 200 Ohm transmitter to a 50 Ohm load?
Assume the 50 ohm load is a good match and "vswr" is minimal, cause I don't want to get into what happens to 'baluns'/transformers start cooking when there's a lot of reflected power.

There are several "baluns" that seem like this type offered commercially. Those have a 50 Ohm coax connector and two terminals for the 200 Ohm side. OK use it in reverse.

Using a transformer to convert a 200 Ohm unbalanced signal to a 50 ohm would also allow a balanced-balanced tuner to be added between the transformer and a dipole or vee type antenna.

So, why not keep it simpler and use a 1:1 balun transformer designed for 200 Ohms, and go into the balanced tuner with 200 ohms?

Or, why not go way out there and use a ferrite bead choke balun, except for finding 200 Ohm coax and needing quite a bit more beads since the choking impedance would have to be 4x that which 50 ohms would require?

just some thoughts
Logged

Radio Candelstein - Flagship Station of the NRK Radio Network.
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1877


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2018, 11:22:56 PM »

The tank circuit provides a flywheel effect.

You'd have to idle the tube in pure class A to get this to work.

Commercial mfg have tried.

Still need flywheel effect.

--Shane
KD6VXI
Logged
WD5JKO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


WD5JKO


« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2018, 09:01:13 AM »



   The attached file takes a Push-Pull-Parallel final with PL519's into a Balanced Pi-Net terminating into a 200 ohm to 50 ohm balun. Still got "flywheel" effect.

Would the same thing work with a single ended final?

Jim
Wd5JKO

* Class_AB_F_Linear (1).pdf (2629.51 KB - downloaded 31 times.)
Logged
AB2EZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1704


"Season's Greetings" looks okay to me...


« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2018, 02:45:10 PM »

All

The use of a 200 ohm <=> 50 ohm matching transformer will work fine in this application provided the power level is not high enough to cause significant saturation of the transformer’s core material.

With the turns ratio fixed at 2:1 you can accommodate higher power (while preventing saturation) by:

Using a core with a higher cross sectional area (i.e. a larger area enclosed by each turn) to reduce the required amplitude of the B field in the core.

And/Or

Using more turns (e.g. six input turns and 3 output turns) to reduce the required amplitude of the B field in the core

I.e. the voltage across the input winding, v(t), is  N x dB(t)/dt x A, where

N is the number of turns in the input winding, A is the area of each turn of the input winding, and dB(t)/dt is the time derivative of the time varying B field passing through the input winding. For a sinusoidal field at RF frequency f, the amplitude of dB(t)/dt is: 2 x pi x f x the amplitude of B(t).

Stu
Logged

Stewart ("Stu") Personick. Pictured: (from The New Yorker) "Season's Greetings" looks OK to me. Let's run it by the legal department
PA0NVD
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 314


Nico and Chappie (Chappie is the dog...)


« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2018, 03:23:15 PM »

Patric said that he uses a PI network to match the tube to 200 Ohms instead of 50 Ohms, so there is a resonance circuit, there is a "flywheeleffect". NO difference, just an other output impedance. And yes, when you want to match a high impedance line like a 450 Ohm ladderline, it is better to feed the tuner with 200 Ohms instead of 50 Ohms. Less impedance transformation will give you more bandwidth and less losses.
If you are worried about saturation of core material, you always can use a coax made balun 1:1 without ferrite
Logged
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6927



WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 14, 2018, 06:48:44 PM »

Yes I was not too specific but there's a chance the pi network will be about 200 Ohms rather than the usual 50.
Logged

Radio Candelstein - Flagship Station of the NRK Radio Network.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.048 seconds with 19 queries.