The AM Forum
April 25, 2024, 05:00:31 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: VT-4-C Tube Info  (Read 3863 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
AB3L
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 491



« on: February 09, 2017, 11:34:02 AM »

I read on aVT-4-C GE tech sheet about running a filament without any plate voltage applied is good for overdriven tubes. Is this a requirement for tubes that have been sitting for years also?

I would think that this would be a consideration if I want to further test these.... outside of an ohmmeter test of a filament?

Thanks,
Bob
Logged
DMOD
AC0OB - A Place where Thermionic Emitters Rule!
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1770


« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2017, 01:04:45 PM »

http://www.tubecollectors.org/archives/vt4c.pdf

Page 3 of 4 specifies this procedure for this specific tube for a specific situation.

Many later tubes used a zirconium coating or a zirconium plate alloy for gettering, so I wouldn't think this procedure applies to all tubes.



Phil
Logged

Charlie Eppes: Dad would be so happy if we married a doctor.
Don Eppes: Yeah, well, Dad would be happy if I married someone with a pulse.NUMB3RS   Smiley
AB3L
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 491



« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2017, 01:40:55 PM »

Thanks Phil, I had been looking at that sheet.

I've Google'd and found someone calling for 24 to 48 hours of burn in time of the filament to remove gas from old tubes before testing of the tube.
So could the tube be damaged ( filament ) if this isn't done?
Logged
W7TFO
WTF-OVER in 7 land Dennis
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2525


IN A TRIODE NO ONE CAN HEAR YOUR SCREEN


WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2017, 10:52:13 PM »

Running the filament in a graphite-anode tube won't do much in terms of gas.

If the getter flash is shiny silver with no rainbow, it is 99% good.

I have successfully de-gassed many vintage transmitter tubes via an ion-pumping scheme worked up in the 50's by the engineers at WOR-AM.

It involves high voltage AC and NO filament lighting.

73DG
Logged

Just pacing the Farady cage...
w8khk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1203


This ham got his ticket the old fashioned way.


WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2017, 11:16:24 PM »

I have successfully de-gassed many vintage transmitter tubes via an ion-pumping scheme worked up in the 50's by the engineers at WOR-AM.
...snip

Is there any chance that would work for an Eimac 250TH that glows like a VR tube with 150 volts DC on the plate?  I would like to hear more about the procedure.  Or should I just move on to more scroteful external anode Eimac triodes and tetrodes?
Logged

Rick / W8KHK  ex WB2HKX, WB4GNR
"Both politicians and diapers need to be changed often and for the same reason.”   Ronald Reagan

My smart?phone voicetext screws up homophones, but they are crystal clear from my 75 meter plate-modulated AM transmitter
AB3L
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 491



« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2017, 10:16:47 AM »

I'm trying to determine if a vendor with an Amplitrex tester had done something wrong or if the filament exploded in transit. I packed six of these and shipped to the guy. Got a compliment from him for the packing and then came back in the same box. Two out of the six sustained filament damage.
The report recorded a heater run time of 13 minutes. 500 volts on the plate.
So that is why I was inquiring about a proper burn in time for a tube that hasn't been lit for at least a decade.

I had a vision of a heated tube being pulled from the socket and laid flat possible causing stress of the filament.

He also doubled the testing price after he did mine, and wrote to me that "they take way too long to test" which also made me wonder if he was forced to rush thru the testing because of profit considerations.

Probably more like shipping damage and a tough lesson learned, and I'll never prove that he may have done something wrong!

Bob
Logged
WU2D
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1800


CW is just a narrower version of AM


« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2017, 04:54:10 PM »

It is amazing that those bottles were once thrown away or sold for less than 75 cents each...
They are listed on this TAB tube sheet from 1957. Tab never advertised them after 1960! They were not worth shipping!

They are listed here can you find them and the price?

* scan0005.pdf (2291.91 KB - downloaded 170 times.)
Logged

These are the good old days of AM
AB3L
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 491



« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2017, 06:50:36 AM »

VT-4-C  = 211

If the 2LL on the sheet was a misprint and should have been the 211 then it was listed for $0.45

I'll take 1000

Logged
WU2D
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1800


CW is just a narrower version of AM


« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2017, 02:02:27 PM »

Beautiful.
Logged

These are the good old days of AM
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.054 seconds with 18 queries.