The AM Forum
April 20, 2024, 06:34:19 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 150% Positive Peaks  (Read 34732 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8163


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #50 on: March 21, 2015, 08:31:02 PM »

Pete, I think Joe makes a reference to 3.705 that it can resemble the gentleman's band, on 160M at times.


Although, the area around 3.705 is far from resembling the "gentleman's band". Got to remember this is 75 meters.

Quote
I'm starting to study for the Extra class to get below 3.700 and enjoy some AM there.

Fred

With the active discussion and proposals about cutting 50 KHz of the Extra phone band portion for data modes since there seems to be a notion of lack of activity ( http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?topic=37939.0 ), more Extras should operate down there to make some noise on a regular basis.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #51 on: March 21, 2015, 09:08:42 PM »

Yup. It's one is 13 months old and #2 is 3 months in the oven.

Jon

Congratulations!  When I finally had 2 kids, I was pretty much off ham radio for quite a while.  Got back into it once they got older.  Now we're empty nesters. Time flies!!!!!
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
ka1tdq
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1509


Red part turned in for a refund.


« Reply #52 on: March 21, 2015, 10:19:46 PM »

When she was pregnant with the first one, I was in a mad dash to get everything built before he was born.  I figured I wouldn't have much time after that.  I completed the linear before he was born, but then started the single FET rig after his birth.  I managed to get that one done with the mother-in-law living with us and helping out. 

Next project is simple... building a power supply for an Elmac A54 that I got from eBay.  And I'm slowly gathering parts for the 8 FET E rig.  I've started drilling holes on the heat sink for the RF FETs.  Not a big start, but it's a start.

Jon

Logged

It’s not just values, it’s business.
W3GMS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3065



« Reply #53 on: March 21, 2015, 10:54:13 PM »

Pete, I think Joe makes a reference to 3.705 that it can resemble the gentleman's band, on 160M at times.


Although, the area around 3.705 is far from resembling the "gentleman's band". Got to remember this is 75 meters.

Quote
I'm starting to study for the Extra class to get below 3.700 and enjoy some AM there.

Fred

With the active discussion and proposals about cutting 50 KHz of the Extra phone band portion for data modes since there seems to be a notion of lack of activity ( http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?topic=37939.0 ), more Extras should operate down there to make some noise on a regular basis.

My reference is that many of the same op's and style are the same on 1.885 and 3.705.   So much so that I seldom get on 1.885 much anymore.   We all have preferences of where we enjoy operating and I find 3.705 very enjoyable.  This conclusion for me has been derived from over 45 years on 160 and comparing it to whatever time the 80M sub-band has been available to us for phone operation.  Other than some of the AWA AM events along with the AM TX rally, I just don't enjoy operating within the "Getto" on 75.  Some people like the adrenalin rush of the happenings on 3.873 but I just don't enjoy the level of confrontation.  As I said, to each their own and be glad we can pick and choose what floats our boat and operate in the part of town we enjoy.

This difference of opinion between our operating styles and what various people enjoy is just something that we all need to respect and move on.     

Joe GMS       
Logged

Simplicity is the Elegance of Design---W3GMS
W3GMS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3065



« Reply #54 on: March 21, 2015, 11:04:58 PM »

Although, the area around 3.705 is far from resembling the "gentleman's band". Got to remember this is 75 meters.

Your wrong again Pete, this is the 80M band and not the 75 meter band and I suggest you spend more time listening and joining in on the many great AM QSO's on 3.705!   Smiley

Joe
Logged

Simplicity is the Elegance of Design---W3GMS
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8163


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #55 on: March 22, 2015, 03:49:56 AM »

Although, the area around 3.705 is far from resembling the "gentleman's band". Got to remember this is 75 meters.

Your wrong again Pete, this is the 80M band and not the 75 meter band and I suggest you spend more time listening and joining in on the many great AM QSO's on 3.705!   Smiley

Joe

75 meters and/or 80 meters; I'm sure the readers get the point. When I do operate 75/80 meters, I actually spend most of my 75/80 meter operating somewhere between 3705 and 3725. But, I'm also one who generally enjoys one on one type QSO's, so very very rarely will I join into a roundtable. Some AM roundtable-type QSO's, unless they're break in-type, are a perfect remedy for insomniacs. You'll also very rarely find me on 75/80 meters during the late afternoon or early evening hours unless maybe on a weekend. I generally hit the 75/80 meter band during the late evening hours after 10 or 11 PM.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
N1BCG
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 836


« Reply #56 on: March 22, 2015, 12:38:11 PM »

One egregious example of excessive bandwidth turned out to be a 20kHz subcarrier. The operator was running some kind of brokered programming.
Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #57 on: March 22, 2015, 02:09:34 PM »

One egregious example of excessive bandwidth turned out to be a 20kHz subcarrier. The operator was running some kind of brokered programming.

 Huh
Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #58 on: March 22, 2015, 02:16:59 PM »

I enjoy all of you as company.  We all have different personalities interests..  I cannot remember anyone I have met in the AM community - who is in conversation with me that I did not appreciate.  The only blight I can see on 75 or whatever band are those who jam QSOs or throw their carrier on without IDs  or generally go out of their way to be obnoxious.

It's sort of like going to a party - there are some I would naturally be attracted to and some who after getting to know I sort of just wander off somewhere else.  Pete (CWA) I would like to hear you on more often.  I can't remember the last time I've heard you.

Al
Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8163


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #59 on: March 22, 2015, 03:07:35 PM »


Pete (CWA) I would like to hear you on more often.  I can't remember the last time I've heard you.

Al

The most recent time I heard you Al was on 40 meters. I think the last time we worked on 75 it was after 12 midnight. I think you said you couldn't sleep or had to pee or something and decided to play some radio since you were up. I'm on almost every day but generally roam the 10 and 15 meter bands with an occasional pop up to 6 meters.

Occasionally, like today, you can find me on 20 meters generally using some vintage SSB transmitter or transceiver.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
N2DTS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2307


« Reply #60 on: March 22, 2015, 06:02:40 PM »

I went the other way today.
I hooked up the four 4-125 rf deck to the push pull parallel 100TH mod deck and ran 500 watts carrier and 1500 watts pep.
That is what the rig wanted to do at 90% negative so that was what it did.
No color on the plates of the 4-125's.
Had a very nice long qso with W8LXJ (Bob) for hours.

Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #61 on: March 22, 2015, 07:52:29 PM »


Pete (CWA) I would like to hear you on more often.  I can't remember the last time I've heard you.

Al

The most recent time I heard you Al was on 40 meters. I think the last time we worked on 75 it was after 12 midnight. I think you said you couldn't sleep or had to pee or something and decided to play some radio since you were up. I'm on almost every day but generally roam the 10 and 15 meter bands with an occasional pop up to 6 meters.

Occasionally, like today, you can find me on 20 meters generally using some vintage SSB transmitter or transceiver.

Couldn't sleep.   Don't have that other problem  Grin

Give me a call some time if you hear me.  I don't think 20 meters would work for us

Al
Logged
ka1tdq
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1509


Red part turned in for a refund.


« Reply #62 on: March 22, 2015, 09:14:05 PM »

Off topic, but quick question...

Steve:  The output coil for your 8 FET class E rig for 75 meters has a value of 5uH.  That give is an Xl value of 122 ohms.  Do I just calculate the new coil value for 7.293 MHz using the 122 ohm value?  If so, it comes out to 2.66uH.

The reason why I ask is because I found a nice commercially made coil that I just need to cut for the specific value.

Jon


* IMG_0358.JPG (1816.61 KB, 3264x2448 - viewed 431 times.)
Logged

It’s not just values, it’s business.
steve_qix
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2599


Bap!


WWW
« Reply #63 on: March 22, 2015, 11:51:52 PM »

Off topic, but quick question...

Steve:  The output coil for your 8 FET class E rig for 75 meters has a value of 5uH.  That give is an Xl value of 122 ohms.  Do I just calculate the new coil value for 7.293 MHz using the 122 ohm value?  If so, it comes out to 2.66uH.

The reason why I ask is because I found a nice commercially made coil that I just need to cut for the specific value.

Jon


That's pretty much right.  Cut the tank capacitor and the coil if half from whatever values you use on 75 meters and it should work.

Regards,  Steve
Logged

High Power, Broadcast Audio and Low Cost?  Check out the class E web site at: http://www.classeradio.org
N1BCG
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 836


« Reply #64 on: March 23, 2015, 03:07:19 AM »

I went the other way today.
I hooked up the four 4-125 rf deck to the push pull parallel 100TH mod deck and ran 500 watts carrier and 1500 watts pep.
That is what the rig wanted to do at 90% negative so that was what it did.

Interestingly, the ideal carrier/sideband ratio topic came up in a 40M discussion with K1KW on Saturday. There are infinite combinations of carrier level and sideband level that result in a 1500 Watt PEP, but where is it optimal?

For example, you can get 1500PEP with 375W@100%, 200W@174%, and at the extremes, 1500PEP DSB with no carrier and 1500W CW with no mod.

Here's something else to consider. Back in the 80s, Leonard Kahn developed his "Powerside" system for AM b'cast stations. It emphasized one of the sidebands and suppressed the other so that the total carrier + sideband energy remained the same. This was to help stations that experienced interference from other stations on first adjacent frequencies by concentrating the modulated energy in the sideband furthest from the other station. Cool, eh? And the FCC approved it.

We had this system at my 1490 station since we got slammed by then WTOP 1500 in DC. It was effective for analog receivers, but unfortunately, it came at a time when digital tuning became the norm, so there was no practical way to tune slightly to the stronger sideband.

Makes me wonder about an amateur radio application since sideband cancelation due to propagation would be reduced.
Logged
N2DTS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2307


« Reply #65 on: March 23, 2015, 08:02:42 AM »

Well, I often do that on the receive side with the sdr.
sdr-radio has buttons that allow you to select upper or lower sideband only AM reception, which works well if something is on one side causing interference.
You can also slide the passband over and it seems to work about the same way.

There ARE guys running single sideband with a carrier, I used to have a KWS-1 which did that, sounded nasty.

Its not like the carrier does not do anything, it quiets the frequency, and a big strong carrier is nice.
You just need to put enough audio on it to be heard.
Are we working DX? Or are we having pleasant round tables or break in?
There is no need to sound like a commercial on TV with super loud audio, and any distortion (in the rig or in the detector) just makes copy harder.

Get the peaks going the right way, control the negative modulation, use some mild compression to keep the audio level up, do a little EQ if needed and call it good.

 
Logged
K4RT
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 520



« Reply #66 on: March 23, 2015, 09:48:18 AM »

One egregious example of excessive bandwidth turned out to be a 20kHz subcarrier. The operator was running some kind of brokered programming.

You experienced this on a broadcast band or amateur radio band?
Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #67 on: March 23, 2015, 09:24:09 PM »

<snip>

There ARE guys running single sideband with a carrier, I used to have a KWS-1 which did that, sounded nasty.

Its not like the carrier does not do anything, it quiets the frequency, and a big strong carrier is nice.....

I think that's a common problem with the KWS-1.  I know of two operators of KSW-1 and they both have that problem.  Problem is with the carrier and the drifting problem the KSW-1s have nowadays it's very challenging listening to them on SSB.  I still don't get why Collins didn't simply add a separate AM board instead of that "Oh, by the way, here's AM" approach.  My FT-301 has a separate  AM board as, I am sure, do other rice boxes.  The KSW-1s need a lot of maintenance to bring them up to the original standards.  Not sure if the drifting problem has a fix.

Logged
ka1tdq
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1509


Red part turned in for a refund.


« Reply #68 on: March 23, 2015, 10:31:38 PM »

I was bored, so I made a YouTube video showing 180 watts carrier and my highest voice peak was 1200 watts.

After reviewing the video, I really appreciate the need for class E stuff.  I'm belching out so much blower noise for PW power.

Anyway, here's the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCbCmiNE2rY

...not a lot of activity on 40 meters tonight.

Jon
Logged

It’s not just values, it’s business.
N2DTS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2307


« Reply #69 on: March 23, 2015, 11:09:52 PM »

I can do that with tubes and no blowers, just a muffin fan on 1/2 speed.
More like 200 watts carrier and 1000 watts pep without any negative peak clipping.
A pair of 4-400's with screen modulation would do 300 watts, 1500 pep and not need any fans or blowers, 10 Hz to 20KHz if you want.

With the dx60B/qix modulator and the pair of 4x150's I could do 25 to 200 watts carrier and 600 watts pep.

Things tend to sound better with normal 4 times carrier mod levels though.

The amount of electricity I used for radio does not matter to me, my wife uses more to dry her hair...

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.085 seconds with 18 queries.