The AM Forum
March 28, 2024, 09:26:03 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Insulated Round Braided Cable  (Read 18522 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« on: February 05, 2015, 11:55:23 PM »

Hello to all,

Anyone know of a supplier for large o.d. UV insulated round braided cable?

The desired o.d. is 1/2 inch round braid plus the UV insulated jacket.

This is for a home brew ladder line project.  I am trying to prevent from buying
coax cable and having to cut the center conductor ends off.

Thank you.

Chuck

 
Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8154


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2015, 01:29:14 AM »

Why not just solder the center conductors to the braid?
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2015, 10:47:29 AM »

Hi Pete,

Yep, I have done that in the past, soldered
the coax center conductor to the braid.

however, if I am buying new cable I do 't want to pay for
extra copper, center conductor, when I don't need it. 

Chuck
Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8154


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2015, 01:44:01 PM »

If you do find it, I bet it won't be cheap. Coax stuff is far more common and probably would result in a cheaper price and achieve the same goal.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
KA2DZT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2192


« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2015, 03:18:20 PM »

If you do find it, I bet it won't be cheap. Coax stuff is far more common and probably would result in a cheaper price and achieve the same goal.

Exactly what I was going to tell him.  Commonly used cables are always cheaper than something that is rarely used, (with the same amount of copper).

Fred
Logged
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2015, 12:10:36 PM »

Anyone else?
Logged
PD0RTT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2015, 12:46:23 PM »

If you do find it, I bet it won't be cheap. Coax stuff is far more common and probably would result in a cheaper price and achieve the same goal.

I agree with that, RG58CU or RG59 is far more cheaper than a big round cable of copper. An alternative what I use is thick isolated loudspeaker cable.
This is what I use for my antenna and feeders.

Martin


* lsp-050lc.jpg (19.9 KB, 283x283 - viewed 634 times.)
Logged
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2015, 10:50:03 PM »

CATV, aka "cable tv" 75ohm coax is dirt cheap still.

If you run into an installer, you may get the ends of some rolls gratis...

I've seen rather large rolls of this "don't wanter" stuff at hamfests quite often.

Of course the center conductor is copper plated steel and will break if flexed too much, but for your
application, should be perfecto.

---------------

PD0RRT, Martin, you use it as-is, or split the wires and make up spreaders?
How much power do you run, IF you use it as-is??
What sort of impedance did you figure it to work out to??

                                          _-_-bear


PS. do you really need the equivalent of two RG-8 braids in parallel for OWL as far as power handling?? Or?
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
PD0RTT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2015, 03:14:42 PM »

@WBear2GCR: I don't split the wire up, but use the two conductors in parallel.
This loudspeaker wire is an excellent antenna wire because it is so flexible and the isolation is transparent and this looks nice.
What I use is (two conductors of) 1,6mm diameter wire, this is similar to AWG14.
There are larger diameter loudspeaker wire's up to AWG11 (4mm diameter).
The power what I use is approximately 300Watt on 1,8MHz, the antenna is a shorted dipole made in resonance by the ATU.
The feeder is only 12 to 15 feet.

Another great stuff for antenna wire and feeders is Flex-weave, you can find this at Davis RF: http://www.davisrf.com/antenna-wire/flexweave.php

Martin
Logged
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2015, 07:20:36 PM »

Looks to my eye that the "Flexweave" conductors are very similar to what is used in the high quality speaker wires... I guess this is ok for the legs of an antenna.

I have to admit that I have never heard of using speaker cable for OWL!
My suspicion is that the characteristic impedance is rather low compared to traditional OWL.
Also, my guess is that at 300w ur probably near or at the breakdown limit for the insulation and spacing.
Perhaps not so much of an issue where there is a good match on each end, but maybe not bulletproof
if a problem comes up on the antenna side of things?

Ah, but maybe ur talking about using it for only the antenna legs, in which case, no worries!
Except for maybe stretch.

I thought the OP wanted to use whatever he was looking to do was to use something for OWL, not
the legs of the antenna, but seems I am confused again!

                        _-_-
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
PD0RTT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2015, 07:51:17 PM »


Also, my guess is that at 300w ur probably near or at the breakdown limit for the insulation and spacing.

I think that I have expressed myself wrong. I use two loudspeaker wires for each leg of the feeder and antenna.
The spacing between the wires is about 8 inch.
So each wire have 2 conductors of AWG 14.
Logged
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2015, 08:53:41 AM »

Ok!

Well that ought to be good for several kW at minimum!!  Grin


                 _-_-
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2015, 09:48:46 PM »

Hi Guys,

I am looking for 1/2 inch o.d. copper braid (not including the outer jacket) because two 1/2 o.d. cables spaced 3 inches gives us approximately a 300 ohm open wire transmission line.

This is the goal.

Chuck
Logged
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8308



WWW
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2015, 10:35:23 PM »

How do you want to keep support of the OD of a copper tube braid?

here is the braid itself:
Alphawire.com
    2174    Tinned Copper     Tubular     0.5          62     A-A-59569A
   94015    Tinned Copper     Tubular     0.5               
   96022    Silver Plated Copper     Tubular     0.5 


Just slip some 0.45 OD nylon tubing into it, and apply some protective insulation to it or slip it into another nylon tube. I assume it has to retain a tubular shape to be useful?

Or, slip the copper braid tube into an outer insulating tube and fill with great stuff white expanding foam which remains flexible and it'll keep it totally tubular..

If you just want to order it, these people can provide you what you want.
http://www.coonerwire.com/tubular-braided-wire/
or
http://www.erico.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=56


Logged

Radio Candelstein - Flagship Station of the NRK Radio Network.
KA2DZT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2192


« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2015, 10:42:50 PM »

Hi Guys,

I am looking for 1/2 inch o.d. copper braid (not including the outer jacket) because two 1/2 o.d. cables spaced 3 inches gives us approximately a 300 ohm open wire transmission line.

This is the goal.

Chuck

I haven't looked at the equation in a long time, but are you sure about your numbers??  1/2" cable three inches apart doesn't seem correct for 300 ohms.  Maybe I'm wrong.

Fred
Logged
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2015, 08:02:06 AM »

Hi Fred:

Here is the tool I used to calculate the 300 ohm impedance numbers.

http://www.smrcc.org.uk/tools/OpenWire.htm

I plugged in .250 inch radius spaced at 3 inches to arrive at approximately 298 ohms.

Chuck
Logged
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« Reply #16 on: February 11, 2015, 08:05:21 AM »

Opcom,

Sir, yes the braid should be round with supportive dielectric
in the center and a protective jacket on the outside.

Chuck 
Logged
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #17 on: February 11, 2015, 10:29:02 AM »

Why braid??
Why not wire?

Why such a large diameter?

Why not make the braid *flat*??

Then insulating it becomes relatively simple.
It still works as a conductor.

Etc...?

              _-_-

                 
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2015, 10:38:24 PM »

The geometric mean impedance between 75 - 1200 ohms is 300 ohms.

The geometric mean impedance between 72 - 5000 ohms is 600 ohms.

A 300 ohm open wire feeder will have lower voltages than the 600 ohm feeder.  I can use smaller spaced air gaps with my air variable capacitors. 

I need a minimum 3 inch distance between the two conductors to help prevent snow and ice
build-up on the ladder line.  A 1/2 inch o.d. round conductor space 3 inches center to center achieves the goal of 300 ohms.

Because of skin effect I though it would be better to go with a tube or round braid rather than solid copper wire.  Most of the solid wire at 1/2 inch o.d. would not be used at RF HF frequencies.  

Flat would work but I don't know how to calculate for the 300 ohm impedance?  The above calculator is measured in round radius of conductor and not flat.

Hope this helps.

Chuck

Logged
KA2DZT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2192


« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2015, 10:52:17 PM »

1/2" solid copper would be expensive and very heavy for OWL.  Even something like RG-8 which is near a 1/2" would be very heavy.  Try to redesign what you're trying to do.  Maybe go up in impedance and use wider spaced caps.
Logged
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« Reply #20 on: February 12, 2015, 07:48:07 AM »

I agree, solid cable or wire are to heavy.

I would like to stick with the 300 system and give it a try.

Chuck
Logged
WBear2GCR
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4135


Brrrr- it's cold in the shack! Fire up the BIG RIG


WWW
« Reply #21 on: February 12, 2015, 12:13:11 PM »

The spacing does not need to be exact. Trying to be too fine is not terribly useful.

300ohms +/- 50ohms is nothing much, imo.

Iced up ladder line is plenty heavy. Cheesy

Scaling the conductor size to the power likely to be seen is a good idea.
To me RG-59 CATV wire seems like what you want/need still... that braid is plenty
sufficient. Skin effect plays not much of a role at 3.5mhz or 7 mhz. imo.


                                 _-_-bear
Logged

_-_- bear WB2GCR                   http://www.bearlabs.com
PD0RTT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #22 on: February 12, 2015, 01:15:50 PM »

1/2" solid copper would be expensive and very heavy for OWL.  Even something like RG-8 which is near a 1/2" would be very heavy.  Try to redesign what you're trying to do.  Maybe go up in impedance and use wider spaced caps.
Sorry, but which means OWL?
Logged
Ralph W3GL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 748



« Reply #23 on: February 12, 2015, 01:57:49 PM »

1/2" solid copper would be expensive and very heavy for OWL.  Even something like RG-8 which is near a 1/2" would be very heavy.  Try to redesign what you're trying to do.  Maybe go up in impedance and use wider spaced caps.
Sorry, but which means OWL?

OWL is an abbreviated (short) expression for  "OPEN WIRE LINE"  as used for balanced transmission (feed) line, rather than coaxial cable   (unbalanced) for a wire  or, for that matter, any antenna...

Logged

73,  Ralph  W3GL 

"Just because the microphone in front of you amplifies your voice around the world is no reason to think we have any more wisdom than we had when our voices could reach from one end of the bar to the other"     Ed Morrow
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« Reply #24 on: February 12, 2015, 07:23:04 PM »

GR-59 would require about a 1.5 (1.45) inch spacing to achieve
an approximate impedance of 300 ohms.  1.5 inches would not
work with snow and ice.  It would load up with snow real easy. 

In a weather mild area of the country this would be an good choice.

Chuck
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 18 queries.