I would urge you all to read through some of these Committee Reports to get a feel for activities, proposals, ideas, etc. being discussed around the various ARRL BoD Committee tables.
http://www.arrl.org/committee-reports#2014As an example from the "Band Planning Committee":
"1. There is substantial support for segmentation of HF bands in some manner such as bandwidth (narrow band and wide band), various modes, automated transmissions, etc. Numerous comments recommended that wide band digital signals be placed in a separate area of the bands in order to provide separation from interference to CW/RTTY signals (narrow band). Some commenters suggested that wide band digital be placed in the upper portion of the existing phone bands, which would place wide band digital transmissions in similar occupied bandwidth as phone."Further
"4. There is a desire to reallocate the lower portion of 80 meters phone band (3600-3650 kHz). Several commenters observed that the FCC’s action in 2006 to reduce the 80 meter RTTY/data band from 250 kHz to 100 kHz and to limit access to 3600-3700 kHz only to Amateur Extra Class licensees has created significant and unnecessary difficulties for CW, RTTY, and data operators and has left 3600-3700 kHz underutilized. Suggestions for restoring some of the lost RTTY/data band ranged from 25 to 100 kHz with 50 kHz being the most frequently mentioned. The Committee will recommend as part of its strawman proposals for members’ consideration that the boundary between the 80 meter RTTY/data band and the 75 meter phone/image band be changed from 3600 kHz to 3650 kHz. Of course, this would require FCC rulemaking."As an ARRL member, if you have issues and concerns, or want some additional clarification on information posted in the various Committee Reports, I would suggest contacting your Division Director, Vice-Director, or specific Committee Chairperson. If you're a non-member, you can do what is normally done, i.e.
P&M into the wind.