The AM Forum
April 25, 2024, 01:39:43 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Suggestions on QST or ARRL designs from the 50-60's for 811, 813, or 4-250 PA  (Read 2852 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 672


« on: August 09, 2012, 04:51:41 PM »

I am finally pulling all the parts together for a CW (maybe phone) 250-500 W linear, or just class-C. Following the KISS tactic I was going to go the route of GG. However, my exciter is a homebrew solid state unit with a Po of 50 W. I plan on visiting the local University library this weekend and was looking for suggestions for past QST treatment-articles for the tubes mentioned above in the post. Key is the power supply and in hand I have a range of xmfr's from 450 V at 1 A to 1500 V at 300 mA. Again, QST-reading material suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Alan
Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8166


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2012, 05:11:55 PM »

Did you try this for starters. There is info on AM linears and a 813 transmitter where you might be able to derived some ideas. http://www.arrl.org/am-phone-operating-and-activities

Also: Jul 1954 - QST (Pg. 20) 813s in a High-Power Linear; Nov 1961 - QST (Pg. 56) Single-Band Grounded-Grid Linears
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
KM1H
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3519



« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2012, 05:14:08 PM »

The 4-250/400 will have the highest power gain and work well with 50W in GG. You may need an input network to get best power transfer. About 2000-2500V would be better. A pair of 4E27A's would do OK at 1500V but 2000V and up is mo betta.

A pair of 813's also like higher voltage, and 50W will just about work with a pair of 811A's and be straining at 300W for CW, forget AM.

Carl
Logged
kb3ouk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1640

The Voice of Fulton County


« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2012, 09:08:31 PM »

If you are going with CW-only, class C will work fine amplifying that, no need to build a linear stage for just CW.
Logged

Clarke's Second Law: The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is by venturing a little past them into the impossible
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2012, 11:07:00 AM »

4-250 / 4-400 are better RF tubes. I used to run class B in CW with my 4-1000A linera. It will require more drive though but efficiency is higher.
813 will work
Logged
W4AMV
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 672


« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2012, 11:55:29 AM »

All good info. Thanks! I think my challenge is going to be the HV supply. The 450 V xmfr is easily 1A plus. Was part of an overhead crane system power supply. I was going to double to 1000 but that still is really to low and even the 1500 V to low as well. At this point if I use what is in hand and go with CW only, I think a pair of 811s are the best bet. I have 4 of them but I don't have the  filamnet supply current to support all 4... 2 is the option now.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 19 queries.