The AM Forum
March 28, 2024, 12:59:56 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ricebox for AM?  (Read 24148 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
W0BTU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 230



WWW
« on: October 28, 2011, 10:41:17 AM »

When I first joined this forum, I promised myself that I would never get on AM with my Icom IC-765 (or IC-751A). However, I recently broke my own rule, and would appreciate some advice about a problem that I ran into doing that.

The other day on 40 meters, I noticed something really odd. I cut the drive on the IC-765 back to roughly 20 watts, and drove my SB-200 (two 572Bs) with it for perhaps 200 watts output. I ran it for about a minute or two into the dummy load, and everything seemed fine. The plates were not showing color, and the meter readings looked fine. I switched to the transmitting antenna and got on the air with it.

However, after awhile, I noticed something really odd. Although the power output meter on the IC-765 showed forward movement on modulation peaks, the wattmeter between the SB-200 and the antenna did not move. At that point, the other AM station said I sounded distorted. (Before that, others said I sounded good, even though I didn't ask for audio quality reports.)

I thought I might have destroyed something, but everything seems OK now. But I don't want to try AM again with that until I have an idea of what happened.

Any ideas?

I have been thinking about building a 160-10 meter plate- or cathode-modulated AM transmitter using a pair of paralleled 833As. I doubt whether I'll ever find a modulation transformer that I can afford, and the design at http://www.montagar.com/~patj/cathmod01.htm looks quite interesting. It uses a power transformer from a solid-state audio amplifier, and I happen to have one of those out in the barn. However, I'm not sure how such a transmitter with two paralleled 833As would work on 10 meters (double the interelectrode capacitance of a single tube), and I like 10 meter AM.
Logged

73 Mike 
www.w0btu.com
N3WWL
Founding
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 311


« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2011, 11:39:27 AM »

Generally speaking, most modern rice boxes will make approximately 40 watts of AM on peaks.  Tune your amp with full output from your rice box and increase the loading control slighly (about a 10% drop in output).  If your rig makes 100% positive peak modulation, then set your output drive to 10 watts.  This should yield APPROXIMATELY 100 watts of carrier from your amp.  I believe you were running out of head room on your amp due to it being over driven by your exciter.  Do you have an oscilloscope?
Logged
W0BTU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 230



WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2011, 11:41:41 AM »

... Do you have an oscilloscope?

Thank you! The next time I try this, I'll have a scope connected. :-)
Logged

73 Mike 
www.w0btu.com
KB2WIG
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4484



« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2011, 11:45:28 AM »

FWIW, the Icoms (the ones I own) don't 'peak' on am, they limit.....  I run my '746 at 20 Watts;  my voice characteristics do not overdrive the output. 10 Watts will give you plenty of headroom fer the Heath.......  JG gave you gud advise

klc
Logged

What? Me worry?
Todd, KA1KAQ
Administrator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4310


AMbassador


« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2011, 12:38:00 PM »

When I first joined this forum, I promised myself that I would never get on AM with my Icom IC-765 (or IC-751A). However, I recently broke my own rule

Silly rule, glad you broke it.  Wink There's plenty of room for all types of AM signals. The days of the few but loud AM snobs who needed to seem superior by running down anyone not running plate modulated rigs has long passed. The important thing going forward is to embrace AM operation, regardless of equipment choice. It's been that way for some time, actually.

And Jay has nailed your problem. The only thing I'd add is to be sure to shut off your ricebox's processor, if it has one. Next to improper tuning, this is the leading cause of distorted audio for SS transceivers. You may need to increase the audio gain a bit after doing so to modulate your carrier properly, but it will sound much cleaner with the processor off.
Logged

known as The Voice of Vermont in a previous life
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2845



WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2011, 12:58:31 PM »

The fact that you say that it was okay at first and for a time, then seemed to develop trouble makes me think you might have gotten into some sort of heat related problem.

There are all sorts of suspects:  modern ham gear unmodified is not always up to the demand of a long AM transmission.  I don't know much about the 200, but the stock 220 with the voltage doubler p.s. and stock cooling that does not move much air through the p.s. can get into trouble with a long geezermission on AM.   Do you have passive components in your feedline path?  Maybe a low pass filter, ferrite choke, tuner with fixed value padding caps...these can heat up and change value and result in a line Z change giving the amp a different load or, the amp's pi network may have fixed value caps paralleled with the load air variable that are not up to the AM continuous circulating current and change value (although this is more likely to be an issue on 160 m. where the dielectric current handling ability is less).

Since I have started operating AM I have fried:  a low pass filter (threw it away; didn't need it), old CRL doorknobs, MFJ RF current amp meters,   ferrite chokes, RF disc ceramic load padder caps IOW everything listed above that was obviously designed for slopbucket.    Running a vintage rig is a worthy goal in my opinion, but that's a discussion for another time.
Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
W3GMS
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3063



« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2011, 01:03:01 PM »

Just a tweak.  If the rig on CW key down is showing 100W maximum, you will never get anymore power out than that.  That is the upper limit.  Divide that by 4 and that gives you your maximum unmodulated carrier output power you can run.  In this example that is 25W.  Now when you modulate 100% that will raise the peak power to 100W.  The 4 to 1 ratio holds true.  Many contemporary rigs due to ALC issues will not allow you to achieve 100% however.  

Have fun and enjoy AM!

Joe, W3GMS      
Logged

Simplicity is the Elegance of Design---W3GMS
W0BTU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 230



WWW
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2011, 01:05:08 PM »


Silly rule, glad you broke it.  Wink There's plenty of room for all types of AM signals. The days of the few but loud AM snobs who needed to seem superior by running down anyone not running plate modulated rigs has long passed...

I didn't know that. I figured that I would not be welcome on AM with my Icom; that is very reassuring. Thank you for that. :-)

Quote
And Jay has nailed your problem. The only thing I'd add is to be sure to shut off your ricebox's processor, if it has one.

The processor does not even work on AM. But it's shut off anyway.
Funny you should mention this. http://www.w0btu.com/files/misc/Icom/IC-765/IC-765%20Mods%20&%20Service%20Info/IC765_notes_VE3HUR.pdf suggests that the processor should be used on AM. So, I tried it, but found that it did nothing in the AM mode.

I have a couple of scopes. For now, I may also put one between the IC-765 and the amplifier, besides the one I used to have link-coupled to the antenna. Since this only happened after I had been talking for a minute or so, something tells me that this problem is in the IC-765 and not the amplifier. (How COULD it be in the external amp?) Perhaps the Icom's  "power output" meter is not actually in the output of the PA.

Maybe it was a fluke. It may be something obvious that I just was not paying attention to.
Logged

73 Mike 
www.w0btu.com
DMOD
AC0OB - A Place where Thermionic Emitters Rule!
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1768


« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2011, 05:23:08 PM »

What kind of SWR do you have between the Icom-7XX and the SSB-220?

Before I put a low power (<300 Watt) matching unit between my Icom and the Henry, it used to cut back due to SWR.


On my Icom 706, I turn the mike gain down just enough to modulate about 90% on the scope, with no processing and the tranceiver ouput power on steady state carrier is 20 Watts or below.

Phil - AC0OB

 
Logged

Charlie Eppes: Dad would be so happy if we married a doctor.
Don Eppes: Yeah, well, Dad would be happy if I married someone with a pulse.NUMB3RS   Smiley
KM1H
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3519



« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2011, 06:02:16 PM »

I doubt anything in the amp is causing this, unless the plate blocking cap is heating up.

Heat problems in the xcvr driver or final section are more likely culprits. I often use my TS-950SD on AM and the LK-500ZC only requires 20W for 350W+ carrier.

Carl

                           
Logged
kb3ouk
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1640

The Voice of Fulton County


« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2011, 06:47:57 PM »

i say that it almost has to be that the amp is running out of headroom, which is why i never run anymore than 150 watts with my amp (a hunter 2000b-quad 572B's), combined with the fact that the micas in the output can't take the heat of any transmission longer than 3 minutes. it will do 180-200 watts easily, but the micas in the output can't take it, so i drop the power back to 100-120 watts.
shelby
Logged

Clarke's Second Law: The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is by venturing a little past them into the impossible
KX5JT
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1954


John-O-Phonic


« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2011, 09:11:13 PM »

Put 10 to 15 watts carrier into the SB-200 (which was tuned for max in CW mode).  That should make about 100 to 125 watts of carrier with enough headroom for peaks.  That's what I do with my TS-570 --> SB-200.... scope always helps!

Logged

AMI#1684
W0BTU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 230



WWW
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2011, 03:27:19 PM »

Thanks for all the help. :-)

The SWR between the rig and amp was very low.
I'll run less power next time.
I'm trying to find my old oscilloscope tuner so I can monitor the signal next time I try this.
Logged

73 Mike 
www.w0btu.com
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3659



« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2011, 01:51:22 AM »

The solution to your problem is found here:

http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?topic=25323.0


Build the simple little box and plug it into the ICom.
Turn the Icom RF power FULL open.
Use the box to set the carrier level.
Turn the audio up to 100% while watching the scope.
You will sound as good as the bandwidth limitation of the icom and or the microphone you use.

This mod is very very popular, Its posted all over the net.  Mine, has a switch on it so it can be disabled for SSB use.  However, I only use the icom on AM if my Other rigs are down or its 120F outside and I cant stand the thought of firing up 4-400s and 304TLS to FURTHER heat the room.

My buddys old Icom,ALC box, with the audio fed Into the back ACC connector (balanced modulator input), A cheap Behringer mixer and a decent sterling audio mic, is damn nice.  Really..

C
Logged
W0BTU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 230



WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2011, 08:18:21 AM »


The solution to your problem is found here:

http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?topic=25323.0 ...

Thanks! This looks great. As soon as I get the scope hooked up, I will build this. :-)
Logged

73 Mike 
www.w0btu.com
ke7trp
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3659



« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2011, 02:53:59 PM »

Let me know if you need any help. I can take a video of mine or a photo or two.

C
Logged
W0BTU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 230



WWW
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2011, 04:49:09 PM »

Let me know if you need any help. ...

Thanks.

I guess I'm going to have to build a new scope tuner. I haven't seen the old one in years, and I've looked everywhere I can think of.

The old one used a simple link-coupled, parallel-tuned circuit, with the each end of the inductor going to the vertical deflection plates of an old 10 MHz Heath IO-18 scope. I have a 100 MHz Tektronics 465B, but I'd rather not tie that one up.

I found a suitable variable cap, I just need to find (or wind) a coil now.

The DC input to the ALC will follow after that.

This afternoon, I'm working on an antenna design in EZNEC. A modified ZS6BKW multiband dipole that ought to let me get on 10 meter AM, among other places. 10 meters is full of AM QSOs right now!
Logged

73 Mike 
www.w0btu.com
K4RT
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 520



« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2011, 06:54:49 PM »

Mike,

I kind of feel the same way. I'm a newbie and have made two AM contacts on 75m using my ricebox, but have been keeping my eyes open for just the right vintage plate modulated transmitter.

Glad to see your post just now as I rounded up the parts today to make that circuit for controlling ALC output, which I found on another web site a while back. I'm planning to build mine inside a round electrical junction box since that's what I have on hand. Hope to find a few minutes in the next day or two to put it together and test it.

I have enjoyed reading through the various threads on amfone.net, including the humor. There's so much to learn. The information I've found here combined with reading a 1951 ARRL Handbook and lots of help from a local AMer as well as listening to some of the AM QSOs have helped tremendously.

73,
Brad
Logged
KA2DZT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2192


« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2011, 08:00:20 PM »

Brad,

Welcome to the AM Forum.  Your mug shot looks a little familiar, can't place it yet but I'll figure it out.

You can learn a lot here, and after a few hundred posts you'll be as confused as everyone else.

Fred
Logged
Pete, WA2CWA
Moderator
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 8154


CQ CQ CONTEST


WWW
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2011, 08:40:33 PM »

Looking back over my "log notes" (scraps of paper) over the last several weeks, out of 47 AM contacts, only 3 were using vintage boatanchor equipment. The rest were using solid-state transceivers, class E rigs, Elecraft, and Flex rigs.
Logged

Pete, WA2CWA - "A Cluttered Desk is a Sign of Genius"
KX5JT
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1954


John-O-Phonic


« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2011, 08:52:06 PM »

Looking back over my "log notes" (scraps of paper) over the last several weeks, out of 47 AM contacts, only 3 were using vintage boatanchor equipment. The rest were using solid-state transceivers, class E rigs, Elecraft, and Flex rigs.

I noticed a lot more "modern solid state transceivers" on 10 meter AM than the other bands.  I really feel GREAT making my contacts with the Viking II on 10 meters.  It's so much funner to me than the Kenwood.  Oh and I seem to get a lot more QSO's with it whether vintage or modern on the other end.

Logged

AMI#1684
ab3al
Guest
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2011, 09:08:47 PM »

you will find that a lot of others have had the same problem with similar icom rigs.. the problem is an over agressive alc.  google alc mods for your rig.  i believe the tric on yours is to slow it down with an added resistor
Logged
K4RT
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 520



« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2011, 09:22:00 PM »

Fred,

Thank you.

It's actor Pierce Brosnan as Professor Kessler in the movie "Mars Attacks!" - that movie's good for some laughs. In that getup he kinda resembles Fred MacMurray in "My Three Sons".

73,
Brad
Logged
KX5JT
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1954


John-O-Phonic


« Reply #23 on: October 30, 2011, 09:43:21 PM »

Fred,

Thank you.

It's actor Pierce Brosnan as Professor Kessler in the movie "Mars Attacks!" - that movie's good for some laughs. In that getup he kinda resembles Fred MacMurray in "My Three Sons".

73,
Brad


And also Bob! 

Logged

AMI#1684
KX5JT
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1954


John-O-Phonic


« Reply #24 on: October 31, 2011, 11:12:44 AM »

Worked WB1EAD, Dave on 29.010 just now.  It was marginal condx but sounding great for a couple rounds when free and clear of the noise floor.  It's quite a different thing getting to know people on forums and then finally working them on the air.  I think it's a new experience somewhat.  The norm used to be working hams on the air and then meeting them at hamfests to put the voice to a face.  Occasionally I had met people at hamfests and them worked them on the air.  But the future is here and now we can meet "dx" personalities online first.  Then the random experience of working them on the air is pretty neat!  I posted this here because he mentioned just reading my earlier post in this thread before working me.  Grin
Logged

AMI#1684
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 19 queries.