The AM Forum
June 23, 2025, 09:06:20 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: FCC Electromagnetic Exposure web page with new Amateur Radio MPE requirements  (Read 4162 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2632



« on: September 07, 2011, 12:12:53 PM »

Ran across this during my job.  Part of my antenna measuring activities require documentation of a safe RF environment.  FCC has a document that pertains specifically to the radio amateur.

General page

http://transition.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/

Specific document regarding safe RF environment from Amateur Radio transmisions:

http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet65/oet65b.pdf

Generally speaking, mobile installations with the antenna on a metal roof is considered exempt from compliance requirements (see page 4).

As responsibile operators of radio transmitters we should be aware of Maximum Permissable Exposure limits (MPE) that have been established by the electrical engineering community and that are regulated by the FCC and the states.

Al
Logged
K5UJ
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2814



WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2011, 01:26:00 PM »

The only valid physiological effect produced by RF exposure is tissue heating which is caused by a field strength and energy level (i.e. frequency) all but a handful of hams won't encounter.  IOW, you just about have to try to produce any causal effect from RF.

Logged

"Not taking crap or giving it is a pretty good lifestyle."--Frank
KA3ZLR
Guest
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2011, 01:29:21 PM »

Well when we had that Class M Exposure yesterday what kind of hazard was that..?
I understand what it is and where it came from but what did we Humans absorb..?

 
73
Jack
KA3ZLR
Logged
DMOD
AC0OB - A Place where Thermionic Emitters Rule!
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1837


« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2011, 02:32:12 PM »

Did I miss it or were ther no SAR calculations done?

PhilL
Logged

Charlie Eppes: Dad would be so happy if we married a doctor.
Don Eppes: Yeah, well, Dad would be happy if I married someone with a pulse.NUMB3RS   Smiley
Jim, W5JO
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2513


« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2011, 05:12:46 PM »

Somehow I feel this is kind of like PEP power measurments.  Doubt if the engineers will be running around with a tape measure unless someone really peaves them.
Logged
flintstone mop
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5048


« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2011, 06:54:13 AM »

The guys running EME high power stations on those microwave freqs should think about this.
HF below 10M, you can hug the antenna at QRO.
Logged

Fred KC4MOP
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2011, 01:18:49 PM »

anything less then 200V/M is candy A$$
Logged
W0BTU
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 228



WWW
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2011, 02:18:14 PM »

What about those low, 6' (+/-) diameter transmitting loops? They can be made very efficient, and the RF field around them is really high.

I'm thinking of building one, and have a page started about them at http://www.w0btu.com/magnetic_loops.html.
Logged

73 Mike 
www.w0btu.com
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11151



« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2011, 10:00:11 PM »

I bet a resonated loop would make quite the field. I would not use it in the house with any QRO power
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.113 seconds with 19 queries.