The AM Forum
April 18, 2024, 04:41:45 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Kenwood R-820 receiver  (Read 6654 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WQ9E
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3284



« on: March 29, 2011, 10:23:11 PM »

Per Steve's request on the "need some input on amps" thread, I will share some thoughts about the Kenwood R-820 receiver.

It is the receiver that was designed to pair with the TS-820S transceiver.  I really liked the way the TS-820S looked when they came out years ago since it has a "magical mechanical" dial like the National HRO receivers.  Several years ago I picked up a nice one and starting looking for a R-820 to match and I came across a one with all of the optional filters at a reasonable BIN price on ebay, I think it was around $400 with the SP-820 speaker.

The R-820 is triple conversion (adds a third low IF with notch filter to the TS-820 style receiving circuitry) and has both IF shift and variable bandwidth tuning.   Unlike the TS-820 it does have an AM position along with a 6 Khz. filter.  It also covers 4 international SW bands (49, 31, 25, and 16 meters) in addition to 160 through 10 plus WWV.    It was produced prior to WARC so those bands are not covered.  It also has slots for two CW bandwidths.  On AM, the audio through the 6 Khz. filter is to my liking, it isn't as broad as some of the vintage receivers but it is far from space shuttle audio and sounds smooth.  The VBT is functional on AM and allows reducing the bandwidth to around 4 Khz., IF shift does not function on AM. 

It makes a great companion to the TS-820 and sounds better on all modes compared to the built in receiver.  I really like the tuning display on these radios.  My only major complaint is even though this is sold as the companion receiver and it will operate in transceive mode with the TS-820S it requires fairly extensive modification to operate in this manner.  I made the modifications to mine but one would expect it to be closer to plug and play as sold. 

The bottom line is I really like the R-820 receiver, it is wonderful in both looks and function.  I have thought about writing an ER article looking at "cousins" instead of twins comparing my Drake TR-7A/R-7 and the Kenwood TS-820S/R-820 setup.  The Drake line definitely outperforms the Kenwood setup but the 820 gear is no slouch.  A few years ago I picked up a second non-working R-820 very inexpensively and it required replacement of one transistor to make the PLL system functional again.  It is now paired with a TS-520 (no transceive possible with this pairing).

Below are photos of the Kenwood area, obviously I need to use the R-820 more since radio room cat Siam Sam has added fur to the finish.  The final photo is of an unusual early Trio CW/SSB pair; the JR-310 and TX-310 which is like the Drake T-4 reciter in that it uses the receiver VFO for operation.  The Trio does include a clarifier offset  for use with either crystal or receiver control.


* Kenwood.JPG (645.21 KB, 1620x1080 - viewed 560 times.)

* R820.JPG (593.83 KB, 1620x1080 - viewed 500 times.)

* Trio twins.JPG (554.89 KB, 1600x1067 - viewed 488 times.)
Logged

Rodger WQ9E
Steve - K4HX
Guest
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2011, 10:30:04 PM »

Thanks Rodger.

I've always liked the looks of the most of the 70's and early 80's Kenwood stuff. Had a set of the gold-faced Twins for while and was always intrigued by the R-820. The Twins are pretty FB performers on AM right out of the box. I never did get around to doing  any mods to them.
Logged
WQ9E
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3284



« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2011, 11:03:52 PM »

You are welcome Steve.

I got my novice in early 1975 and upgraded to general in time for Field Day.  My new general rig was a SB-102 and I was used to it.  The 10 meter CW station at the FD setup was a set of Kenwood 599A twins and when I first tried the R-599A the band sounded so quiet I thought it was deaf until a loud CW signal popped out of the speaker.  It is a very quiet receiver with excellent sensitivity. 

I have also operated mine on AM and the transmitter sounds better and is less touchy to setup than the Yaesu FR-101/FL-101 line.  The only downside to the 599 line is the transmitter doesn't cover 160. 
Logged

Rodger WQ9E
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 18 queries.