The AM Forum
April 25, 2024, 03:34:45 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Links Staff List Gallery Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Air Variable Capacitor voltage Ratings  (Read 35363 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
w5omr
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 306



« on: January 25, 2011, 01:18:01 PM »

Howdy, guys and gals.

Who knows the amount of voltage an Air Variable capacitor is rated at, given the distance between the plates?

Is there a formula?

Reason is, I've got a dual-section split-stator air variable capacitor that's got 5/16" spacing between the plates.  3 plates on the rotor and 2 on the stator.

E. F. Johnson model number 5BD8  (ser 365)

Google doesn't spit anything out.

73 = Best Regards,
-Geoff/W5OMR
Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2011, 01:26:02 PM »

There is a lookup table in the ARRL handbooks.  I built an Excel spreadsheet based on that data but can't get to it right now.

If no comes forward with the info, I'll post the spreadsheet when I get a chance

GL es 73, Al
Logged
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2011, 01:32:20 PM »

I recall from memory that 3/16" gives a nominal 7000 volt spacing.  1/2" gives 9 kv.  The the chart should be in any handbook (assuming they haven't discontinued it as they have done with a lot of other useful information in recent editions).

It is not exactly a linear function.  Doubling the spacing gives slightly less than double the voltage breakdown rating.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2652


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2011, 01:49:45 PM »

You'll have to do the math, but here ya go...

Spacing   Voltage (PEAK)

.015          1000
.020          1200
.030          1500
.050          2000
.070          3000
.080          3500
.125          4500
.150          6000
.175          7000
.250          9000
.350          11000
.500          13000

You're at .3125, so I'd say at least 9Kv


--Shane
Logged
w5omr
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 306



« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2011, 02:10:32 PM »

and now, boys and girls, the idiot savant ham radio operator will attempt to CORRECTLY read a tape measure.
(...geeze...)



* IMAG0154.jpg (979.62 KB, 3264x1952 - viewed 1522 times.)
Logged
w5omr
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 306



« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2011, 02:13:07 PM »

As measured on my Digital Volt meter, the cap is ~40uf (or 0.040nf, if you prefer) per section, with voltage spacing at/near 9/16" of an inch (better'n 10kV).

anyone interested in it, before it goes on e-pay?


Logged
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2652


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2011, 02:34:40 PM »

and now, boys and girls, the idiot savant ham radio operator will attempt to CORRECTLY read a tape measure.
(...geeze...)



AS I'm in the same boat as you, I found an EASY way.

Run down to Harbor Freight.  Pick up a cheap digi micrometer.  One that does BOTH english and metric.

Problem solved.  You'll still have to solve for the decimal eq. of the fraction, but otherwise, you're good to go. Smiley

I wouldn't trust the HF mic's to be accurate enough to do ANY real precision work (machining parts for an engine, etc), but for cap ratings, they should be more than adequate.

--Shane
Logged
KF1Z
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1796


Are FETs supposed to glow like that?


« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2011, 03:13:50 PM »

As measured on my Digital Volt meter, the cap is ~40uf (or 0.040nf, if you prefer) per section, with voltage spacing at/near 9/16" of an inch (better'n 10kV).

anyone interested in it, before it goes on e-pay?




I think you likely mean 40pF

or   0.04nF

 Grin
Logged

k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2011, 03:52:20 PM »

You'll have to do the math, but here ya go...

Spacing   Voltage (PEAK)

.015          1000
.020          1200
.030          1500
.050          2000
.070          3000
.080          3500
.125          4500
.150          6000
.175          7000
.250          9000
.350          11000
.500          13000 

Interesting that doubling the spacing from .015 to .030 only gives a 50% increase in voltage rating (1 kv to 1.5 kv), but doubling it from .125 to .250 doubles the rating from 4500 to 9000.  But doubling it from .250 to .500 gives only a 44.4% increase from 9kv to 13kv. If that chart is true, not only is it a non-linear function, it does not vary consistently according to the percentage increase in spacing.

Here is the formula for breakdown voltage with a gas dielectric, as a function of the pressure of the surrounding gas. The non-linearity has to come from the log functions, plus the "Secondary Electron Emission Coefficient", however that would be calculated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakdown_voltage#Breakdown_in_vacuum



Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2011, 04:49:45 PM »

40 pf is pretty useless but 400 pf would make a fine tuner cap.
Logged
w5omr
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 306



« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2011, 05:40:29 PM »

I think my DVM only goes up to maybe 40, or 400 - not much more...

so... 0.040nf according to the meter...
and there's two sections.  Might be "just enough" to get you over that hump to get a tank circuit like say... a B&W CX-77 butterfly plate tuning cap on 75m.
;-)
Check the 'for-sale' area, lest I get my wrists smacked by the moderators...
Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2011, 06:13:53 PM »

Here's what I have. The data was lifted out of the ARRL handbook.  There was a little atypical bump in the data so I smoothed it out and did a paranormal trend on it.

I'm thinking someone some time did a "high school science project" and actually used a lab to gather the data.  There are formulas out there but this is more or less what I use

Shane - that's the same data I got out of the handbook.  I've included the curve from that.  Note the atypical sag around .125"  That's why I did the normalization.  I've included that chart too FYI

Al


* AIR VARIABLE CAP SPACING VS BREAKDOWN E.jpg (66.86 KB, 772x528 - viewed 6555 times.)

* AIR VARIABLE CAP SPACING VS BREAKDOWN E (unnormalized).jpg (61.94 KB, 772x527 - viewed 2249 times.)
Logged
N4LTA
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1075


« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2011, 07:44:39 PM »

Old engineers rule of thumb - Dry air is 30KV/inch breakdown voltage - Thats not what you design to - that's the breakdown voltage.
Logged
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2652


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #13 on: January 26, 2011, 11:13:15 AM »

I'll dig my Orr's Radio Handbook out later, I seem to remember the spacings in it where a bit different than the ones in the ARRL manual.  I always took the most conservative ratings.

--Shane
Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2011, 01:04:23 PM »

I'll dig my Orr's Radio Handbook out later, I seem to remember the spacings in it where a bit different than the ones in the ARRL manual.  I always took the most conservative ratings.

--Shane


Sounds good to me.  Lemme know what your results are.  I'm all for the conservative approach.  I'm dealing with the same issues while building a transmitter - also (maybe) a balanced tuner. If I can get some data, I can draw that curve in Excel for the in between points.

Al
Logged
WA1GFZ
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11152



« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2011, 01:20:46 PM »

Johnson KW match box uses 7000 volt caps. My Fugly tuner uses 1/4 inch plate spacing
Logged
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2652


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2011, 02:06:22 PM »

Here's the reference chart from Orr:

.030          1000
.050          2000
.070          3000
.100          4000
.125          4500
.150          5200
.170          6000
.200          7500
.250          9000
.350          11,000
.500          15,000
.700          20,000

Incidentally, he has a SEPERATE chart for use when NO dc blocking cap is present.  The ARRL says you need DOUBLE the Vrating of the DC component, Orr is a bit more pessimistic.  And, he points out they are ratings for CW/SSB..  No data for AM...

Spacing    DC Volts
.030          400
.050          600
.050          750
.070          1000
.070          1250
.078          1500
.100          2000
.175          2500
.200          3000
.250          3500

Orr does state to use double the spacing necessary for plate modulation, but then he states that you need 1.5 times the voltage when plate voltage is present on the cap...  Of course, his chart shows different.  I'd go with at least double.



--Shane
KD6VXI
Logged
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10057



« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2011, 02:26:30 PM »

My first high power AM rig used a single 304-TL, running 2500 volts on the plate @ 400 mills.  The plate cap had 0.175" spacing, and would occasionally flash over on voice peaks even when everything appeared to be properly tuned up and fully loaded.

My present HF-300 rig runs only 2 kv on the plate at maximum, and also uses a 0.175" spaced cap in the plate circuit.  In never flashes over unless I forget to properly tune something and fully load the final, even with positive modulation peaks well in excess of 100%.

Both rigs use(d) a series fed tank circuit so that the DC did/does not appear across the plate cap, but eliminating the need for a plate blocking cap/ rf choke.

OTOH, the first time I tried to load the 80m dipole as a 1/8 WL dipole on 160, using a parallel tuned circuit with the OWL tapped down on the coil, it not only was very inefficient, but the tuning capacitor would flash over on voice peaks with more than about 100 watts carrier, even when adjusted for a perfect 1:1 SWR on the coax link from the transmitter to the tuner.  The tuning cap was split stator, a BC-610 plate cap 150/150 pf (also with 0.175 spacing). The problem was that I was trying to feed the OWL at its most reactive spot, exactly midway between a voltage loop and a current loop.  I added an additional 60' of OWL to the feed line so that it came out to a voltage loop, and it tuned up perfectly using parallel feed; I have never seen the tuner arc over on voice peaks at any power level.
Logged

Don, K4KYV                                       AMI#5
Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM...    Never got off AM in the first place.

- - -
This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout.
http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
KM1H
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3519



« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2011, 05:44:43 PM »

Maybe Al can graph this also.

Johnson/Cardwell contribution to arcing:

Peak withstanding voltage for the 153 and 154 series.

Spacing      Volts

.030            1000
.045            2000
.075            3000
.080            3500
.125            4500
.175            7000
.250            9000

It might also be a good subject for the tech section

Carl
Logged
w1vtp
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2638



« Reply #19 on: January 26, 2011, 08:30:07 PM »

Maybe Al can graph this also.

<snip>

It might also be a good subject for the tech section

Carl

The actual data looks a little "squiggley"  I did a trendline to make it into a "predictable" curve

Al


* KM1H'S BREAKDOWN E CHART.jpg (219.71 KB, 913x663 - viewed 1410 times.)
Logged
aa5wg
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 435


« Reply #20 on: January 27, 2011, 10:30:36 AM »

Hi Guys:
Shane - KD6VXI.
Which edition of Bill Orr, W6SAI, handbook did you use?
73,
Chuck - AA5WG
Logged
WD8BIL
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4410


« Reply #21 on: January 27, 2011, 10:50:36 AM »

Now, how does Frequency effect those numbers?
Logged
W9GT
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1242


Nipper - Manager of K9 Affairs


WWW
« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2011, 11:10:42 AM »

Seems like altitude AMSL and humidity also have an effect.

73,  Jack, W9GT
Logged

Tubes and Black Wrinkle Rule!!
73, Jack, W9GT
KM1H
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3519



« Reply #23 on: January 27, 2011, 11:35:10 AM »

Quote
The actual data looks a little "squiggley"  I did a trendline to make it into a "predictable" curve

Al

You noticed  Shocked  Im sure Johnson rounded off the values a bit to the nearest 500V Grin

Next overlay all the graphs and see which are conservative vs optimistic. Take the mean average and it probably realistic.

There is a mention of RF vs 60Hz voltage and also humidity, maybe buried somewhere on W8JI's site or a discussion on one of the amp forums.

Carl
Logged
KD6VXI
Contributing
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2652


Making AM GREAT Again!


« Reply #24 on: January 27, 2011, 12:55:23 PM »

23rd edition, 1987 edition, 1993 printing date, if that makes a difference.


--Shane
KD6VXI
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

AMfone - Dedicated to Amplitude Modulation on the Amateur Radio Bands
 AMfone © 2001-2015
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.084 seconds with 18 queries.