KL7OF
Member
Offline
Posts: 2323
|
|
« on: December 06, 2010, 07:38:10 PM » |
|
I have 2 wattmeters that were obtained a hamfests....A SWAN WM 1500 and a MATTCO PX 1000...Both do not work. The meter movements seem OK and no visibly scorched components inside..I found a schematic for the Swan and was unable to find anything on the Mattco...Looking for advice on how to test these circuits for repair.. I am also wondering if there is a simple way to boost the power handling capability of either of these units....I would like to have a wattmeter that would read at 3KW or4 KW...Any ideas?...Thanks Steve
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11151
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2010, 08:20:25 PM » |
|
Sounds like blown diodes. Use 1N5711 or 1N4148. If the pickup is a line going through a toroid then just add turns of wire on the core. Multiply the turns by 1.4 to double the power. I would go to a bigger core if it is smaller than .68 inches for 4KW. It is a current transformer so more turns means less current to the secendary or less output power to the rectifier. I built a copy of the Collins watt meter that goes to 1KW. I just increased the series resistance to the meter to shift it to 2KW. Lightning has taken out my reflected power diode when I forgot to remove the antenna during a storm.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KL7OF
Member
Offline
Posts: 2323
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2010, 09:00:07 PM » |
|
In the Swan WM 1500the toroid is about .375 diameter so it looks like it will be too small for 4 KW....I have some toroids that are almost .750 that I bought for beverage antenna transformers....I could try one of those......Does the density of the toroid make any difference in this case?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member
Offline
Posts: 10037
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2010, 09:07:49 PM » |
|
Toss those worthless pieces of crap and order a Bird APM-16, or if in the likely event you won't want to spend that much money, search the net for a good thermocouple rf ammeter.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Don, K4KYV AMI#5 Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM... Never got off AM in the first place.- - - This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout. http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
|
|
|
W7SOE
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 804
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2010, 11:18:29 PM » |
|
Toss those worthless pieces of crap and order a Bird APM-16, or if in the likely event you won't want to spend that much money, search the net for a good thermocouple rf ammeter.
Maybe someone can clue me into what is so great about Bird watmeters. I have a Swan meter and it seems to do the job. It is probably accurate to within 20 watts, who needs more? I can understand that the Bird meters are rugged and accurate but they seem on the wacky side of expensive. And then you need to buy the plug-in element? For over $100? What is that, a shunt? Solid gold? Rich
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
W3SLK
Member
Offline
Posts: 2695
Just another member member.
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2010, 11:23:14 PM » |
|
Rich said: Maybe someone can clue me into what is so great about Bird watmeters. I have a Swan meter and it seems to do the job. It is probably accurate to within 20 watts, who needs more? Then you will be able to announce over the air your power out in "Bird Watts!!!"
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mike(y)/W3SLK Invisible airwaves crackle with life, bright antenna bristle with the energy. Emotional feedback, on timeless wavelength, bearing a gift beyond lights, almost free.... Spirit of Radio/Rush
|
|
|
KA2DZT
Member
Offline
Posts: 2190
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2010, 12:52:36 AM » |
|
I only use Bird meters for measuring RF power. They are expensive. They were a lot cheaper 25 years ago. The thing about them is that 25 years later my Bird meters still work perfect.
Steve, you should be able to buy a used Bird 43 off ebay for about 150. The elements have jump in price over the past few years. I paid 40-50 for mine back 25 years. The HF elements were always more than the VHF elements.
Most likely the diodes are toast in the ones you have, like WA1GFZ mentioned.
Don mentioned using a RF thermocouple amp meter which another way to measure power, if you know exactly what your load resistance is.
If you're looking for a peak reading meter, well that's another issue if you're using any of the above mentioned methods.
Fred
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KX5JT
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 1948
John-O-Phonic
|
|
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2010, 01:14:43 AM » |
|
Rich said: Maybe someone can clue me into what is so great about Bird watmeters. I have a Swan meter and it seems to do the job. It is probably accurate to within 20 watts, who needs more? Then you will be able to announce over the air your power out in "Bird Watts!!!" OR you could just say "A little Bird told me I'm running a 374.9 Watts of Carrier" -- they'd probably think you mean a Bird Wattmeter...
|
|
|
Logged
|
AMI#1684
|
|
|
KL7OF
Member
Offline
Posts: 2323
|
|
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2010, 01:26:00 AM » |
|
I have RF amp meters on several of my transmitters and I find the scale of such size that there is not much meter swing...harder seeing small changes...They also seem slower to react than most wattmeters...I have never had bird watts before..the meter seems smallish....I like a big meter with a lot of swing...Bird does however, seem to be the most available high power unit around...I saw a military 5 KW unit that was the size of a shoebox but it had a big meter..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WA1GFZ
Member
Offline
Posts: 11151
|
|
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2010, 08:01:10 AM » |
|
3/8 is way too small for 4 KW, it will saturate. I used -2 iron (red) .68 inch. I have a mil coupler with 1 inch yellow (-6) The best detector I've seen is to copy the Collins watt meter. There is a good article in the old red ARRL SSB handbook. I built mine in a small minibox with a pair of type N connectors on each side. A short section of RG393 with the shield terminated on only 1 side. I calibrated it with the bird. I think you can duplicate the performance if careful with layout.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
n2bc
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 289
|
|
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2010, 08:29:34 AM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Slab Bacon
Member
Offline
Posts: 3929
|
|
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2010, 09:00:09 AM » |
|
If you dig around at hamfests, the best bang for the buck is still the old military AN/URM 120. These can still be found in the $100 range with all 4 "slugs". Good from HF all the way to UHF. They are easily calibrated and quite accurate. Each slug has 4 power level positions and is easily calibrated for an exact operating frequency if needed. I have a Bird 43, but am too cheap to buy all of the slugs I normally need, so I still find myself using the 120 most of the time. I bought a pair of them some years back for $40 with all of the slugs to boot. (sometimes we get lucky) and still use them constantly to this day.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"No is not an answer and failure is not an option!"
|
|
|
KB2WIG
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4468
|
|
« Reply #12 on: December 07, 2010, 10:12:40 AM » |
|
" Maybe someone can clue me into what is so great about Bird watmeters. "
The Bird is the word.
klc
|
|
|
Logged
|
What? Me worry?
|
|
|
Opcom
Patrick J. / KD5OEI
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 8301
|
|
« Reply #13 on: December 07, 2010, 07:13:22 PM » |
|
Toss those worthless pieces of crap and order a Bird APM-16, or if in the likely event you won't want to spend that much money, search the net for a good thermocouple rf ammeter.
Yes they are inaccurate, and have been known to have radioactive meters and leak PCBs. Please mail all apparently working and unwanted wattmeters to me postpaid for proper disposal. I am good on QRZ.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Radio Candelstein
|
|
|
KM1H
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 3514
|
|
« Reply #14 on: December 08, 2010, 08:59:37 AM » |
|
Any POS can become accurate if you calibrate against a Bird . Create a cheat sheet for the frequencies and power you want. BTW, I need a 100W 2-30 Bird 43 slug, mine took a walk Carl
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KL7OF
Member
Offline
Posts: 2323
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2010, 09:54:39 AM » |
|
Carl, I saw a site that tells how to take apart a bird slug and repair it..I'll post the link if I run across it again... Steve
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred k2dx
Moderator
Member
Offline
Posts: 247
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 08, 2010, 10:16:59 AM » |
|
Watch for Sola/Dielectric meters at hamfests. The elements interchange directly with Bird and Coaxial Dynamics. The 3 1/2" meter is larger than the Bird 43's and makes it much easier to view small changes. The shape makes it much more stable for use in the shack, especially with RG8U type cables. The Bird 43 series is better suited for field use. I have one of each... my Sola Model 1000 has served me well for a long time. It was purchased from a trusted seller at a hamfest years ago and was old then. The newer 1000a model has a different style meter but should be as good. Here's a link to one source: http://www.nm3e.com/prod01clones.htm
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KB2WIG
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4468
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 08, 2010, 10:43:06 AM » |
|
F,
Thbbft! Sola/Dielectric watts are not as good as Bird watts. What whatts do you think Bill is pining for?
klc
|
|
|
Logged
|
What? Me worry?
|
|
|
W7SOE
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 804
|
|
« Reply #18 on: December 08, 2010, 12:38:17 PM » |
|
If you have one watt meter you know your power level; if you have two you know nothing.
Rich
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WD8BIL
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4413
|
|
« Reply #19 on: December 08, 2010, 12:41:33 PM » |
|
FGI:The Sola/Dielectric meterline was purchased by Coaxial Dynamics > 20 years ago.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KL7OF
Member
Offline
Posts: 2323
|
|
« Reply #20 on: December 08, 2010, 01:53:36 PM » |
|
Google..."A photo tour of a bird wattmeter element"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WD8BIL
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4413
|
|
« Reply #21 on: December 08, 2010, 02:27:15 PM » |
|
One word of caution to anyone who intends to repair their elements.
The positioning of the pickup loop and any other "tabs" in the sampling area of the elements must be handled with care. Their positioning is critical to the directivity and frequency response of the element. These are pointed out in the attached photos.
photos by WA1MIK and VE3YX
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KM1H
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 3514
|
|
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2010, 09:17:03 AM » |
|
Carl, I saw a site that tells how to take apart a bird slug and repair it..I'll post the link if I run across it again... Steve
By walked I mean literally, I cant find it! Id appreciate that link if you find it. I also want to try to adapt a 50 to 75 Ohms. Carl
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WD8BIL
Contributing
Member
Offline
Posts: 4413
|
|
« Reply #23 on: December 10, 2010, 09:33:46 AM » |
|
http://www.repeater-builder.com/projects/bird-element-tour/bird-element-tour.htmlIn the article, Carl, he explains getting the teflon cover off. There's 2 ways it is held on. Some have screws holding it from the topside under the cap. The snap on ones come off easier ifn you freeze the teflon first. I put crushed ice in a shallow bowl and place the element's teflon cover in the ice for 5 minutes.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
k4kyv
Contributing Member
Don
Member
Offline
Posts: 10037
|
|
« Reply #24 on: December 10, 2010, 12:33:33 PM » |
|
If you have one watt meter you know your power level; if you have two you know nothing.
Rich
Touché!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Don, K4KYV AMI#5 Licensed since 1959 and not happy to be back on AM... Never got off AM in the first place.- - - This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout. http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak
|
|
|
|